Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Holy smoking guns. Please someone tell me this guy isn't reliable.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bling bling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 04:13 AM
Original message
Holy smoking guns. Please someone tell me this guy isn't reliable.
His name is Skolnick. Has anyone heard of him? Is he a reliable source? I'll honestly be relieved if he isn't.

On the chance that he is reliable -- this guy has reports with smoking guns galore. Any bloggers brave enough to attempt to research and expose the Bush Administration for the criminals we think they are will have a field day on this website with tips and information provided by Skolnick.

His stuff goes back years. One thing that stuck out to me were his posts prior to 2000 discussing the Bush family's shady business dealings involving oil and the British monarchy and other international interests. I immediately thought of a thread I read here after the election by a DU'er who overheard some diplomats talking about the election-scandals being on an international level.

Another *very interesting* report a few years ago stated that in the first Gulf War the military was ordered to bulldoze over Iraqi's and many of them were buried alive. 150,000 Iraqi's were killed. Anyone remember stories about "mass graves" that were uncovered by troops in THIS war that made it sound as though Saddam Hussein was behind it?

Much much much more....

http://www.skolnicksreport.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes. I have heard of Skolnick.
He has been around Chicago for years. He is controversial, and often made the news in years past.

Sometimes his stuff is true, even if he seems over the top. Anyway, what is over the top these days? Who knew we would have two stolen elections, an illegal war, a prostitute/reporter in the White House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Skolnick once had a pretty good reputation...
... but I think since the web came along, he's been kind of a kook. He really doesn't have many "smoking guns." If you notice, he makes lots of associations, but almost never has any documentation or direct sources of his own to back it up. He may be right about some of his theories, but the hard evidence is lacking.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bling bling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He said somewhere his sources were "insiders"
and that he's been to jail something like 8 times for not revealing his sources.

If any of his associations and theories are right on, it would be great if someone with the ability and resources to do research could verify any of it.

I used to have access to my college library online databases but about 2 years after I graduated they revamped the system and only current students can use it.

It would be a whole lot easier if someone on the inside would just come out in person and blow the whistle. On the other hand, I guess Sibel Edmonds and Richard Clark DID do that and it didn't do anything to stop the BFEE.

Sometimes I wonder if anyone or anything will stop them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
republicannincompoop Donating Member (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Maybe, But On The Front Page Of His Website, For Years
he has posted the Homosexual prostitute ring in the Reagan/Bush White House article from the Wash. Times.

Made specific charges now proved true: SOMEONE in the White House issued Guckert(?)/Gannon daily press passes. Gannon IS a male prostitute, so charges made of Bush being Gay by Sherman ring true. Heck, he was a male cheerleader, so Bush is straight? Maybe he and his father feud because they are so alike? Bush1 was accused of paying for the "services" of a black male teenager by another child abducted and at the party Bush attended.

There IS a record of who issued the Press passes to a fellow with a false ID. THAT is the issue, the homosexual side of it is just the blatant hypocrisy that "flames" across this administration.

Sorry, I couldn't help it.

Who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Hi republicannincompoop!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. To your point about mass graves, yes.
There was an expose in the New Yorker, must have been in 2000, must have been September or later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-22-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
7. one thing that's food for thought
he apparently bought into the whole "Clinton is a Red Chinese agent" thing that the far right was pushing a few years ago/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC