Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Alabama wants to ban vibrators except to law enforcement, legis., jud.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 12:58 PM
Original message
Alabama wants to ban vibrators except to law enforcement, legis., jud.

http://www.pamspaulding.com/weblog/2005/02/alabama-again-supreme-court-rejects.html


Guess if you're in Alabama and need a vibe, you better do it mail order or over the internets. :) I'm still trying to figure out how the exemptions are defined. Is a strap-on ever used for law enforcement purposes? No, I don't want to know. Paging Roy Moore...

(AP):
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected on Tuesday a constitutional challenge to an Alabama law that makes it a crime to sell sex toys. The high court refused to hear an appeal by a group of individuals who regularly use sexual devices and by two vendors who argued the case raised important issues about the scope of the constitutional right to sexual privacy.

The law prohibited the distribution of 'any device designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs.' First-time violators can face a fine of up to $10,000 and as much as one year in jail.

The law, adopted in 1998, allowed the sale of ordinary vibrators and body massagers that are not designed or marketed primarily as sexual aids. It exempted sales of sexual devices 'for a bona fide medical, scientific, educational, legislative, judicial or law enforcement purpose.'

Georgia and Texas are the only other states that restrict the distribution of sexual devices, according to the court record in the case.
-snip-
--------------------------------


Alabama needs to be saved from itself


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Where are the "less government" Republicans now?
Oh, that's right; it was all a lie...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. only allowable for interrogation purposes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. So I guess
they're going to orgasm people to talk? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Apparently there are too many dildos in the judiciary already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plausible Donating Member (386 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Red State Scary but the US Supreme Count? yikes

I can't stop laughing thinking about this line:
The high court refused to hear an appeal by a group of individuals who regularly use sexual devices

This country is scaring me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. I'm pretty sure that Clarence Thomas dissented.
"aw, c'mon - it'll be fun! Here, have a Coke...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. You mean, they'll have to use their siblings once again?! - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. We know what Bill O'Reilly will be talking about tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. In that case, they should ban farm animals in 'Bama too.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. lord . . .
help us. Too easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atommom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. Mind-boggling. So, does a person with a "medical" reason for
purchasing one need a note from the doctor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GiovanniC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well, Your Honor, I NEED That
It's a neck massager.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. well, this 'law' explains eveything!
I remember when this was proposed but jeebus, I didn't know it was passed!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. What if you're "educating" a sexual partner
Would it be allowed then? Maybe they expect the parents to take care of that in Alabama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. No, no. The only education is abstinence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Oh yeah, I forgot.
That's no fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plausible Donating Member (386 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Would it be an act if kindness to
Edited on Wed Feb-23-05 03:11 PM by Cloud Walker
send free samples to the residents of Alabama, Georgia and Texas along with the US Supreme Court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. It gives a whole new meaning to "no child left behind." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. I guess O'reilly wont be going to Alabama.
unless he can get a prescription for one.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Not even for the falafel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
20. As a lifelong resident of Alabama...
...I can say that I fear there is no "saving" this place. It's too far gone.

First, legislation banning miscegenation is barely recalled (repealed by a 60/40 popular vote) a couple of years ago.

Then, a measure to repeal language endorsing segregation within the state constitution is defeated this past fall.

The gay marriage amendment is sailing through the state government and will pass public approval.

Now, this vibrator legislation is upheld.

And it looks like Roy "Ten Commandments" Moore is about to become our next governor.

Hate to say this, but maybe it's time for Alabama's few progressives to migrate to states where conservatives hold a slim margin of control, somewhere they can actually make a difference. Maybe.

After a while, certain types of nobility become little more than pointless masochism wrapped in a martyr complex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I agree, misanthrope!
We are trying to get the hell out of here. I'm tired of banging my head against the wall. I keep thinking/hoping things will change, but they don't. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
22. In Texas they're called a "anatomically correct condom education model"
I'm not kidding. It's like the a water pipe is not a bong loophole. It's insane.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jswordy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-23-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
24. Impetus for the AL law came from then-AG Bill Pryor...
...Now a Bush recess-installed federal judge. Pryor will come up for review again. And this time, Congress will approve him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC