Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reproductive Privacy Under Attack

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 06:27 PM
Original message
Reproductive Privacy Under Attack
On February 22, attorneys for two abortion clinics in Kansas filed a brief (pdf) with the Kansas Supreme Court in their continuing effort to protect the privacy of their patients. The State Attorney General, Phill Kline, claims he is conducting an investigation into sexual assaults on children and that one or both clinics are not reporting sexual assaults to the authorities. He has subpoenaed the medical records of 90 women which District Judge Richard Anderson upheld in a decision on Oct 21, which are to include “any and all files, reports, histories, charts, graphs, papers, documents, images whether electronic or otherwise, and/or computer files containing medical or patient care information…” No allowance was made for the redaction of names, sexual, legal or other history that might be contained in the medical records.

The investigation launched in October is secret, meaning no one except Kline and presumably Judge Anderson even know what evidence is available that launched the investigation in the first place. Women’s abortion records could be given to the State Attorney General, with little or no privacy protection, and the women in question would not even know that it has happened. The brief also states that all 90 cases involve abortions at or beyond 22 weeks, which are restricted by Kansas State Law. The Attorney General has apparently received these records, which are identified by a Kansas Dept of Health and Environment numbering system, which are supposed to be kept in “the strictest confidence absent a showing of reasonable cause.”

In watching Kline on an MSNBC interview, I did not hear him state that anyone came forward to allege that a sexual assault on a child had been committed. Rather, he appears to be basing his investigation on statutory rape laws that state a minor cannot give sexual consent. He refers to ten year olds, but because the investigation is secret, we do not know if there are actually any ten year olds involved. The records of the 90 women include adults, which is further indication that his investigation is not about crimes committed against children.

In 2003, there were 11,697 abortions in Kansas. In checking gynpages.com, there are 2 abortion clinics in Kansas, which would indicate that they are the two abortion clinics represented in the briefs. Of those 11,697 abortions(pdf), 5,534 were out of state residents, primarily from Missouri and Oklahoma. Missouri appears to have only two abortion clinics as well, in St. Louis. Of the abortions performed at or beyond 22 weeks (pdf) in 2003, 46 were reported to be Kansas residents and 445 from out of state. Not only are these figures consistent with previous research that late term abortions are extremely rare, it also appears that lack of access to abortions increases the likelihood of late term abortions.

Kansas has enacted all of the abortion laws the anti-abortion groups have advocated, including parental notification. But this is not enough. Anti-abortion appointees like Kline continue their assault on women’s right to reproductive medical privacy. Crimes are investigated after allegations have been made. We all have the expectation that Attorney Generals will conduct investigations within the confines of the Fourth Amendment and guarantee that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated...”

.pdf links:
http://www.lightupthedarkness.org/blog/default.asp?view=plink&id=426
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, well, thank heavens I have other things to worry about.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's amazing..so all these anti-abortion fundis are actually CREATING
the likelihood of LATER abortions by making access to abortion so difficult.

*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's how you know they are all about
controlling women through fear, shame, and Draconian laws.

All under the sentimentalized patina of "motherhood" and concern for fetuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. If you were looking for assaults on children
you wouldn't limit your scope to women having late-term abortions and you wouldn't need to examine any where minors were not involved. I'd be interested to learn if he checked ERs or other places where young women might report sexual assault that did not result in pregnancy.

This is a witch hunt, pure and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Looking for data about abused children? Call out the psych records of men
Seriously. Why not supeona all the clinical records of males in therapy? Afterall, males are the primary perpetrators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. I haven't mentioned today how much I hate these people.
God Almighty, I hate how they use one crime to harass women who have exercised their constitutional right to an abortion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-25-05 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. "What's the Matter With Kansas?" should be mandatory reading for all DUers
Thomas Frank's terrific book spells out the problem: Kansans have been repeatedly voting against their own economic interests for decades now, and drifting farther rightward each year, **instead** of venting their anger at the very forces that are causing their problems, and voting themout of office. Kansans seem to be okay with their lousy economy, as long as God, "morals" and "values" continue to be dangled in the forefront of their lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC