Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Republican Party: The Anti-Senior Party

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 01:38 PM
Original message
The Republican Party: The Anti-Senior Party

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Bankruptcy.html

March 2, 2005
Senate Rejects Senior Homestead Protection
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 1:23 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Senate on Wednesday rebuffed a Democratic attempt to provide senior homeowners special federal protection from a proposed law making it harder for people to erase their debts in bankruptcy.

Mostly along party lines, it voted 59-40 to reject a proposed amendment that would have allowed older people to get special homestead exemptions allowing them to keep their homes when they file for bankruptcy. Currently, such exemptions are determined by the states.

``Seniors are the people who need the exemption most,'' Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., said during debate before the vote.

But Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, argued that the bankruptcy overhaul bill as written already provides protections for elderly people and that, when it comes to homestead exemptions, ``The choice belongs to the states.''





GOP attacks AARP over Social Security


- - - - - - - - - - - -
By David Espo

http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2005/03/02/gop_attacks_aarp/print.html

March 2, 2005 | Washington -- Republicans attacked the AARP as well as congressional Democrats on Wednesday as they struggled to build momentum behind President Bush's call for personal investment accounts under Social Security.

The AARP, which claims 35 million members age 50 and over, is "against a solution that hasn't been written yet," said House Majority Leader Tom DeLay after a closed-door meeting with the GOP rank and file.

He called the group's opposition to personal accounts irresponsible and hypocritical, adding that it sells mutual funds to its own membership.

A spokeswoman for the organization had no immediate comment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. GOP = Get / Gouge / Gore Old People -eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. It sells mutual funds to its own membership
That has nothing to do with social security Thomas. Besides, if justice is done, you will be in jail soon. Although I am old enough to be a member of AARP, I'm not, but I do urge them on in their efforts to "fight the power."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't believe they are fighting the power.
I believe the GOP has decided to turn the AARP into a new ACLU it can scapegoat and demonize. The AARP is a big sleeping elephant, run by Republicans. It doesn't even know what's about to hit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think its good that they don't know what's about to hit it
And when the hit comes, the old folks will hit back. Maybe the gop doesn't know whats about to hit it. One by one, groups of Americans who the gop decides to make enemies will start adding up. And won't that be grand. When the red states start losing Medicaid (Mississippi is on target in two weeks) who will be to blame? The gop is in charge of everything and members of the AARP don't have the time to dilly dally and politic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I'd like to think that they're going one step too far.
After all, they seem to be picking on a demographic that actually votes. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yep. Remember, today's seniors
were the activists of the sixties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Huh??!!!
"He called the group's opposition to personal accounts irresponsible and hypocritical, adding that it sells mutual funds to its own membership."

Yeah. And? Do they deduct the cost of those mutual funds from their membership's pensions, against the will of the members?

WTF??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. In his view, they should be grateful that the Bushists are proposing
to dump a shitload of SS money on the private sector. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Meanwhile The Rich Walk With The Money Out The Backdoor
These cads are covering up the draining of whatever money remains in the Social Security Trust funds and making a debt so great there's no way the government's gonna be able to meet the payments on those entitlements and fight wars for profit at the same time. Something's gotta go.

The Repugnicans have fractured the seniors in many ways...using religion and tax cuts to divide the interests of these people and divert their attention from the ongoing fleecing of their savings. Destroying SSI means destroying yet another pillar of that deadly "New Deal" that the right wing needs to destroy just to destroy.

Meanwhile if you're wealthy and beyond the need for needing Social Security, you're able to nut away more money with greater tax breaks...all on the backs of the remnant of the middle class and the working poor. These robber barons aren't concerned about the future, they're gonna grab while the getting is good and someone else clean up the mess. No hypocrisy when you don't have to face the consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Repugs surely are the anti-senior party: moreover, the anti-constitution
party, the anti-rule of law party, the anti-fiscal responsibly party, the anti-diploymacy party preferring instead pre-emptive war, the anit-environment party, the anti-fairness party, the anti-middle class party, on and on ad nauseam, in fact, Repugs are the anti-American party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC