Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shouldn't Poppy be on trial WITH Saddam?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 02:04 PM
Original message
Shouldn't Poppy be on trial WITH Saddam?
Margie Burns writes that the U.S. Department of Commerce licensed 70 biological exports to Iraq between 1985 and 1989, including at least 21 batches of lethal strains of anthrax.Under President Bush, shipments continued four more years, after the Iran-Iraq war ended in 1988.

"Also between 1985 and 1989, Iraq's Atomic Energy Commission got 17 batches of 'various toxins and bacteria.' In 1985, the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) shipped at least three samples of West Nile Fever virus to Basra University. Other lethal samples included botulins and E. coli.
"In 1994, Senator Don Riegle (D-MI, 1976–94) reported a list of lethal bio-products sent to Iraq. Their presence was verified by UN inspectors in Iraq.

"Too many US corporations supplied Iraq with chemicals to list here; a class-action lawsuit filed by more than a thousand Gulf War vets in Galveston, Texas, in 1994 (Coleman et al v Alcolac et al) names several, including Alcolac, Phillips Petroleum, Unilever, Allied Signal, and Teledyne."

http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/Burns090502/burns090502.html

The Boston Globe reported in November 1993:

"Several congressional committees had found evidence that senior members of the Bush administration knowingly approved US-guaranteed loans for Iraq and technology transfers that were diverted into Saddam Hussein’s nuclear weapons program, his chemical weapons and ballistic missiles. They also discovered evidence suggesting obstruction of Congress, false statements and perjury."

The House Judiciary Committee called for a special prosecutor to investigate the evidence, but Bush Senior claimed executive privilege, and the Congress stood down. He knew how to use his experience as C.I.A. director to obstruct every investigation of his criminal behavior as Vice President (Iran-Contra) and President (Iraq arms sales).

more stuff to make you go "Hey!"
http://www.new-enlightenment.com/whybush.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Co-defendants. Rummy, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Soooo. How can we make this happen?
You are right and Poppy could be tried on other things as well in regard to his relation with Saddam and why he stopped short of taking out Saddam in the first Gulf War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Like father, like son.
Apple didn't fall far from the tree. If I was an Iraqi, I'd have to ask- what did we do to the Bush family to deserve this kind of tratment for the past 35 years?

I'd put Dick and Don up there too. Dick is especially sickening.

1980's - Congress - Selling WMD to Saddam, profits to Halliburton. Chair on Iran-Contra, defends guns-for-hostages.
1989-93 - Sec Def - DS1, profits to Halliburton
1995-00 - CEO Halliburton - Circumventing US embargo to trade with Saddam, profits to Halliburton.
2000+ - VP - Operation Iraqi Liberation (OIL) - war with Iraq, profits to Halliburton.

I see one constant in this picture....profits to Halliburton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. AFAIK, those shipments were legal at the time they were made.
If, on the other hand, this is simply a 'what would you REALLY like to do to Poppy, in an ideal world' question, then my answer would be 'yes'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The answer to your question is, YEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!
and for good measure let's throw in JUNIOR, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC