this was an odd, non sequitur endorsement from Hemmer that even left Jack Cafferty scratching his head.
I'm SO GLAD that Harry Reid, later the same day, on the same network, brought some sanity to the discussion of Alan Greenspan.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0503/03/ltm.06.html
<snip>
CAFFERTY: …
What's the answer to the country's financial problems? A more mundane fellow named Alan Greenspan voiced some very strong concerns about economic stagnation if the clowns in Washington don't get their act together, which I ain't holding my breath.
Carol writes, "Our whole system needs to change, but people who are willing to do that can't get elected. We apparently have the kind of government we deserve until the people start to lead. And in the meantime, I'm not optimistic."
Cheryl in South Carolina writes, "Gee, Jack, you're asking me. I do OK, but I haven't balanced a checkbook in years. I rely on my husband and bankers for serious financial advice. And I did vote for John Kerry in the hope of seeing some progress and change."
And Mike in Flemington, New Jersey, "Two things can be done to reduce the deficit, and it only requires politicians with guts to do them: one, raise taxes, two end corporate welfare by slashing the defense budget. We can already kill everyone on the planet 20 times over. It will be OK if we can only kill them 10 times.
HEMMER: No. 3, keep Alan Greenspan in charge. He's doing OK still.
SERWER: That's not going to last forever, of course.
O'BRIEN: No, it can't.
HEMMER: Thank you, Jack.
More…