Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is your position regarding immoral laws?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
pabloseb Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 04:25 PM
Original message
What is your position regarding immoral laws?

In the debate about illegal immigration the phrase "they're breaking the law, why is there even a discussion" comes up all the time.

I think that's a very poor argument for progressive people.

Does that mean we shouldn't fight the death penalty (those of us who are against it) because "it's the law, so why are we even discussing it?" ?

Does that mean people should refrain from smoking marijuana until it's allowed legally because "it's the law, so why are we even discussing it" ?

Does that mean that we should just accept the new bankruptcy law because, now, "it's the law, so why are we even discussing it" ?

"Why is there even a discussion about prostitution in the states where it's illegal?"

As you can see, the list of examples can go on and on and on. And with many current topics, no need to refer to the "blacks are 3/5 people issue".

Now, you can certainly argue that the current law regarding illegal immigration is morally and politically correct and therefore should be supported and enforced.

A debate at that level would be worth of progressives.

But just saying "it's the law" is by its very definition a most conservative position.

Although some DUers support the death penalty and others don't, when the issue is debated noone just says "it's the law, killers should just accept it period". Everybody believes it makes sense to at least debate a more benign law for killers. Why should we hold illegal immigrants to a higher standard?

On the other hand, I realize that debating (and being willing to break) each and every law would make social life quite difficult.

So what is your possition? When should we question a law? When (if ever) should we support breaking a law? Are there any instances when "it's the law" can be the final answer to an argument?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have found the argument,
"they are breaking the law" only seems to apply to Hispanic illegals not European ones. I have always considered those who say this racist.
Just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Great point
I remember reading that only about half of illegal immigrants are coming up from Latin America crossing the border. The rest (from the remainder of the planet) came in legally but stayed after their visas expired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pabloseb Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. White immigrants also face less risk of deportation

Because of racial profiling, Mexicans are more likely to be randomly stopped by police, trigging a deportation procedure.

And I'm sure whites would have more chances to apply for legal residence or benefit from an amnesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtbymark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. IMO- all laws should be based on Mill's 'Harm Policy'
period.

That is an act that creates harm to another, physically, mentally or financially. And any act that infringes on another's right to be at liberty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pabloseb Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I agree with the principle, but

there are many cases where it may conflict with itself. Jailing a criminal would go against the principle, but so would leting him/her free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC