Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hannity denied the facts to defend Congressman Gibbons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 07:52 PM
Original message
Hannity denied the facts to defend Congressman Gibbons
http://mediamatters.org/items/printable/200503040005

Hannity denied the facts to defend congressman Gibbons

In an interview with Nevada State Democratic Party communications director Jon Summers, Fox News host Sean Hannity denied that Rep. Jim Gibbons (R-NV) plagiarized the text of a recent speech and that Gibbons's speech had suggested that opponents of the Bush administration's policies "ought to be used as human body armor." In fact, news articles published prior to Summers's appearance on the March 3 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes confirmed that Gibbons repeated large portions of a copyrighted 2003 speech by Alabama State Auditor Beth Chapman. And Gibbons did suggest that antiwar and pro-choice advocates should be used as "human shields" in Iraq.

On February 28, the Elko Daily Free Press reported on Gibbon's February 25 Lincoln Day speech in Elko, Nevada:

"I want to know how these very people who are against war because of loss of life can possibly be the same people who are for abortion?" Gibbons said. "They are the same people who are for animal rights, but they are not for the rights of the unborn."

He said that they are the same people who wanted to go to Iraq and become human shields for the enemy.

"I say it's just too damn bad we didn't buy them a ticket," Gibbons said.

Laughter rippled through the room, mingled with more applause.

"If they want to be human shields, I say let them serve the men and women of honest integrity that epitomize courage and embody the spirit of freedom by wearing the proud uniform of the United States military," Gibbons said.


When Summers said that "Gibbons came out, and he said that anyone who opposed this administration's policies, anyone who disagreed with his opinion ... ought to be used as human body armor," Hannity repeatedly stated, "That's not what he said," as Summers spoke. As the Daily Free Press reported, Gibbons used the term "human shields," which mirrored a portion of Chapman's 2003 speech, in which she said that if antiwar and pro-choice "movie stars say they want to go to Iraq and serve as human shields for the Iraqis, I say let them buy a one-way ticket and go."

In fact, Gibbons took most of his speech from Chapman's text. As the Daily Free Press first reported nearly five hours prior to the March 3 broadcast of Hannity & Colmes: "Chapman's speech is 21 paragraphs in length, of which Gibbons used 15 paragraphs word-for-word in his Lincoln Day address." The Daily Free Press further noted that "Gibbons did not mention that the speech had been written and previously delivered by Chapman" and that Chapman said that Gibbons "had not requested permission to use her speech." Chapman also told the Daily Free Press that Gibbons "apologized today for using large portions of her speech." Nonetheless, when Summers stated that Gibbons' speech was plagiarized, Hannity said that was just an "allegation" and accused Summers of "playing politics."

In concluding his interview with Summers, Hannity said: "All right, Mr. Summers. Thank you for joining us tonight and sharing your talking points over and over." For examples of Hannity delivering Republican talking points, see http://mediamatters.org/items/itembody/200407080011 & http://mediamatters.org/items/itembody/200411170004

— A.S.

Posted to the web on Friday March 4, 2005 at 6:03 PM EST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. How is Colmbs going to work with someone who's so clearly divorced himself
from reality?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hannity totally glossed over the plagiarism, accused Summers of TP's
... and then consistently spouted talking points himself about statements from Dean and Byrd.

Does Hannity ever listen to himself? I mean really listen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. I would expect Handjobbity to defend any Republican
no matter what they said or did. If a Republican congresspuke were conclusively proved to be a serial killer or a child molester he'd think of some reason why it was really OK for them to do that. The guy is the worst kind of scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. KO mentioned the plagerism tonight............
......but not the Hannity angle. Honor among thieves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hannity deserves yet another CONSERVATIVE IDIOT OF THE WEEK. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohinoaklawnillinois Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I, wholeheartedly, agree that Insannity should be the #1
Conservative Idiot of the Week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. Hannity looks more and more stupid as the Dems
Edited on Sat Mar-05-05 08:14 AM by adigal
get their acts together. The last few times I watched the show and listened to him on the radio (disinfectant needed) the Dems refuses to answer his absurd, baiting questions and have been staying on their talking points, and he is left saying to them, over and over, "Now, I'm going to ask you one more time, and give you one more chance to answer the question," and then the Dem refuses to answer, and gets his talking points out.
It has actually been enjoyable watching his show as his frustration grows and grows now that the Dems are on to their unintelligent tactics, and obviously organizing on the best way to respond. They have had great discipline it staying on point and actually acting like the little man with the pointing pen is not even there.
And Colmes has actually been smiling. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slater71 Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yet again.....
We have no answer to this other than here. That is why the will continue destroying us. We can`t stop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC