Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ANOTHER GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL BANS CONTACT WITH PRESS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 10:32 PM
Original message
ANOTHER GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL BANS CONTACT WITH PRESS
ANOTHER GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL BANS CONTACT WITH PRESS

In wake of Maryland Gov. Robert Ehrlich's ban on state employees speaking to two Baltimore Sun staffers and an Ohio mayor's prohibition on city employees speaking to the local Business Journal, a smalltown Oregon mayor has announced that all media contact with town officials or employees must be made through her office.

(AP)
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000825822

Another Official Bans Contact with Press

Published: March 02, 2005

PHOENIX, Ore. (AP) The mayor of a small town in Southern Oregon has barred all elected officials and employees from discussing the city's business with reporters. Phoenix Mayor Vicki Bear said all media questions must be funneled through her office. Bear said that the goal was to have a single contact person for the media, and that as mayor, she seemed the most likely candidate.

But one councilor told The Ashland Daily Tidings that the decision was not put up for a vote or discussed in a public meeting. A reporter for the Daily Tidings who tried to keep a pre-scheduled meeting with a Phoenix city planner received an e-mail from Bear, reading, "When I said that there is a contact person for media that is exactly what I mean. That doesn't mean that you turn around and contact the city's planning dept."

Jim Naureckas, an editor with Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, a national media watchdog group, said in his opinion, the mayor's idea was not in the best interest of the residents of Phoenix. "It creates the illusion that there is only one point of view," Naureckas said. "The public has a right to get a variety of viewpoints from their government. If there are a variety of people discussing the issues, it is more likely the public will get a better idea of what is going on." Naureckas said such a directive might make it difficult for a whistleblower to step forward and alert the public to any government corruption, and the order might infringe on the free speech rights of city employees.

In Baltimore, Maryland Gov. Robert Ehrlich last fall last fall barred state employees from talking to two journalists at The (Baltimore) Sun, saying the two were not objectively covering his administration. The newspaper sued in December, saying the order violated the journalists' First Amendment rights. But a federal judge in February ruled that Ehrlich could freeze out the two reporters, saying the paper wrongly asserted a greater right to access to government officials than private citizens have. And in Youngstown, Ohio, last week, the twice-monthly Business Journal sued to overturn Mayor George McKelvey's month-old ban on city employees talking to the paper.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. How the bloody hell can they get away with this?
Governments are supposed to work for the people. How can they order public employees NOT TO TALK to the press on local, clearly non-"national security" issues?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yep
I guess they forgot about: government of the people, by the people and for the people. I guess now it's all for corporations. Everything is so secretive now. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Democracy 2.0 - ceo style
the chosen few will M$MW will applaud the logic of this move.

http://images.globalfreepress.com

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. What part of "serve the people" do they not understand?
It boggles the mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Phoenix is a little town that is better than this. What a total cow to
do this. I love Phoenix. Caught between a liberal bastion like Ashland and a commerce center like Medford. God, I am sooooo homesick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. actually, this is not a new thing. Lots of small cities have this sort of
a policy. Bigger cities have a media relations person or department that still clears things through a mayor. I can tell you that the one thing an elected official hates more than almost anything is to have an employee out shooting their mouths off to the public about policy and then the mayor or other elected officials catching hell for it. It's not all about cloak and daggers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-04-05 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. Where does the law say that a mayor or governor
has the power to tell everyone in the city/state whom they can talk to?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC