Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is this why Daschle was so passive?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:14 PM
Original message
Is this why Daschle was so passive?
I guess I'm a little slow on the uptake, or in denial. But I just never really allowed to myself to consider the possibility that Daschle was SCARED.

I knew all about the anthrax attack, which was actually decently covered by CNN, which I was addicted to at the time. I can still see that block printed envelope in my mind with his name on it.

He would not be paranoid to see it as a warning; he would be stupid not to. I just never wanted to think of it in those terms. I wanted to believe that he wouldn't let himself be intimidated, even as I raged against his inaction.

Bur, really, isn't that the simplest explanation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think Daschle simply wanted out of national politics...
...I can't blame him much for that, we are going to loose a lot of good people who just don't care to be smeared and dragged through the mud and possibly be in danger for their lives and the lives of the ones they love. It really is a toxic business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. He wanted out?
I never heard that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. Getting out, by choice or otherwise, will prove to be a blessing.
A tremendous shit-storm is coming ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Some say
That is the reason Kerry conceded so quickly.

They have proved they will stop at nothing to get their way. They will lie, cheat and allow thousands to die so that their PNAC plans move forward.

Since there has never been a resolution, arrest or even further attention paid to the anthrax attacks, any reasonable person could surmise there are sinister forces at work, and they are working on the opposition to the PNAC planners.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Quite possibly true in which case a sane person would conclude
...."who needs this kind of danger" and walk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Since I only fairly recently began paying alot
of attention to politics, could you tell me something about what Daschle was like before the anthrax business.

In any event, I think that if you can't do your job due to fear for your life, you have an obligation to either get out of the way for someone who is less afraid, or else scream bloody murder about it until there's an appropriate investigation.

I can't say that I'm really unhappy about Daschle's defeat. I think Reid is displaying much more backbone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2diagnosis Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes, threats are a way of life for many in the spotlight. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Good points, cunchyfrog!
I like what you said about Daschle's obligation to get out of the way or to scream bloody murder. I also like Reid. As far as how Daschle behaved before the anthrax, I'm afraid my memory is faulty. Somehow I don't think he was ever that aggressive toward *, but perhaps others remember more clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Daschle always "held back" because of S Dakota politics
Thta's why our "leader" should always be someone who can "afford" to be bold.

During the window of oppportunity when Jeffords jumped, and Daschle did NOTHING, I was furious.

That was the perfect opportunity for the Dems to play a little hardball, and at least initiate some official investigations into some of the scummier dealings of this admin. Once started, and publicized, they would have been hard to stop...but he played footsie with the repubes..and poor ole Jeffords ended up jumping for nothing really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dachle's mistake is that
he didn't see this whole post 9/11 thing as a new departure such that "as we must think anew, so we mustr act anew" and speak anew. He didn't have in him to break out of his "Washington insider" ethos and begin to fight and resist the gambits of Bush in new ways. He didn't have the courage of his convictions ort at least didn't speak from the heart as to what those might be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Daschle was exactly the same before the anthrax as after.
A congenial, pleasant, soft-spoken guy. Not bad as a local politician, but decidedly NOT suited to be Senate Minority Leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Daschle was the wrong man for the Senate Leadership job.
As a Democrat in a very Republican state, he was very hesitant to step far away from Bush.

In fact, he semi-endorsed Bush's war on terror.

He was a good man in a no-win situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. The repukes were after Daschle for a long time.
The "Get Daschle at all Costs Campaign". Whiney repukes talked about him on cspan...His name was dissembled on the internets (Dasshole) by repukes. I guess it was the way for the little people that have no power to tear him down. But they got their talking points from folks like Rush, Hannity and countless other hate radio jocks. The final push was Gannon working hard to drag Daschle's name in the gutter with lies. It worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. I don't think it is just fear
Edited on Sat Mar-05-05 09:53 PM by teryang
There is a reward side of equation as well.

Your typical politician never rocks the boat too much nor does he stake all on one fight.

I read an article which suggested that his spouse made a lot of money on the airline bailout after 911. After all it was free money for all after 911, a virtual looting of the treasury.

Why rock the boat and take very real personal risks when you are becoming extremely wealthy? Go along and get along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quakerfriend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. Daschle was great before and after the anthrax
These creeps can not be fought by one man alone.

They sabotaged him, most definitely.

I believe that he really won this last go around, but because of election fraud was denied the spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cascadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. He should have been braver than he was...
and he should have backed up his speeches in Congress with actions. For example, he went on a very long speech against the proposed invasion of Iraq and then he went and voted for it. Is the kind of leader the Democrats want? No. He brought it all on himself and no amount of anthrax would have helped Daschle. He said one thing and did another.


John
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. I say that he always tried to be a diplomat and present a face of
democratic diplomacy in the early years and could not change his mo. He was like all the rest of the Dem politicians....he was way too late in changing behavior. Did he ever don Rove armor?

He and many others including Kerry had to/have to know about the theft, treachery, and lies and the attempts to throw out the constitution and run a secret government....but few of them put their foot down. What did Daschle and Kerry do for the vote thefts of 2000 and 2002? To be precise - voting machines. Exactly what? Answer that and you might have the answers to some bigger questions.

Where was his line in the sand?

They failed/fail to see the right wing push to reverse all the progress of the last 100 years - or they see it, but can't talk about it?

Our voices were/are Byrd, Wellstone, Kennedy, Conyers, Sanders, Boxer, Kucinich, Dayton, and a few other good souls, while Daschle (and Kerry) spoke/speak to the Repubs in diplomatiqese.

I may be totally unfair. I think his seat was probably stolen. He probably lost an unbelievable amount of sleep during the time he served. Living under the scare of anthrax or your plane being taken down while commuting must be a harrowing way to live.

I probably sound like an ungrateful pita because the assault by Rovians is serious and massive and we don't need to pile on, but the DNC, DLC types have to figure out how to put their foot down - how to save us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. Certainly is much coertion with this WH gang. I feel so sad for those
patsies that participate in the coertion & personal attacks and baiting and all.

Sorry for you guys. My people in Canada can still put a long stick between them and the WH.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. I don't think it makes sense, no.
I mean- if he was too scared to do the job he'd been elected to do, he could always resign.

I think Daschle's problem is that he's a career politician from a DLC era. A moderate Republican, in other words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
19. Certainly knowing that someone tried to kill him, and that
the DOJ wasn't going to do anything about it, probably was pretty discouraging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. On top of that,
Edited on Sun Mar-06-05 05:23 AM by Art_from_Ark
both bu$h and cheney personally contacted Daschle and "asked" him to "limit" the 9-11 investigation. What, exactly, did they say to him?

http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/29/inv.terror.probe/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. It's not hard to imagine what they said
but I wonder why he listened, unless he was afraid?:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-05-05 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. Does anyone remember the scolding we got from Kennedy on Buzzflash?
It was right after he elected not to filibuster the medicare bill, and Kennedy wrote that screed about not "forming a circular firing squad" and how Dashcle had "steel in his spine" or something.

I was like "huh"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. That's weird
Of course I was none too pleased with Kennedy when he played footsie with * on NCLB. He's been better since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
24. I had always figured that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC