Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RW Bigotry caused 9/11 (Don't ask, don't tell)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:38 AM
Original message
RW Bigotry caused 9/11 (Don't ask, don't tell)
Hundreds of highly skilled troops, including many translators, have left the armed forces because of the Pentagon’s rules on gays, at a cost of nearly $200 million, the first congressional study on the impact of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy says.

Many who were discharged had intelligence-related jobs. Also, 322 spoke foreign languages, including Arabic, Farsi, Korean, and Mandarin, which the Pentagon has called critical skills amid threats from terrorists.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7025815/

Maybe 9/11 would not have happened if GLBT people were allowed to serve in the Military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Last Lemming Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Are you kidding
you've always got to reverse things with this administration--make black--white. We (America) know what we want and we don't need any translators to tell us what it is. After all "we create our own reality." Translators would only get in the way and they might learn things that are best not to appear in the daylight. No, being gay was the excuse. These guys were experts and what do you do with experts when you run this kind of government? You purge them.

Don't even think that this administration doesn't know what it's doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. 100+ pages into the 9/11 Report I have to say that the RW is pointed to
Edited on Wed Mar-16-05 08:57 AM by underpants
on several occasions. A complete recap would be difficult to do even at this stage but in several instances the 9/11 Commission directly points out both RW obstruction and hypocrisy, as nicely as possible.

The report is much sharper than MSM let anyone think when the immediately poo poo-ed it.

Make no mistake the Clinton administration takes it lumps (especially on not bombing OBL in Kandahar) but the excruciating detail on the step by step processes illustrates that they were working on it day and night. Clinton directly established counter terrorism as a priority-to a greater extent after the Embassy bombings but I haven't gotten to the Bush administrations part of the story yet.

Anyway back to the RW's role. The report specifically states that the atmosphere of investigation and scandal of the 90's (read Clinton administration) clearly impeded counter terrorism efforts. Though Orin Hatch's "phony threats" comment is not directly mentioned it is alluded to as the Republican controlled Hill openly discounted every effort by the Clinton administration mostly due to political posturing. The Commission also points out that the media (cough cough) bears some blame as the threat of terrorism was almost completely unreported even after the first World Trade Center bombing. They clearly point out that Newt Gingrich at first supported the missile strikes on Tankar farm but later called them "pinpricks"- a message later used in the Bush campaigns.

Again I am only a little over a 100 pages through the report and many of the points above are only contained in a few summary sentences at the end of paragraphs but the "in between the lines" are hard to miss.

Sadly I know how the story ends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC