Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Landrieu's Statement on ANWR Vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Tweed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:03 PM
Original message
Senator Landrieu's Statement on ANWR Vote
Edited on Wed Mar-16-05 08:05 PM by Tweed
http://landrieu.senate.gov/~landrieu/releases/04/2005316C23.html

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
03/16/2005

Sen. Landrieu Statement on ANWR Vote

WASHINGTON --- The following is a statement by U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) regarding her vote today to maintain a provision in the federal budget that would open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for oil exploration.

Sen. Landrieu said:

"For Louisiana and our nation, more domestic oil and gas production is vitally important. We need to be drilling more, not less. We need to be exploring new areas where the minimal environmental impact can be closely guarded, as well as in the Gulf of Mexico, which generates billions of dollars of revenue for our federal government each year. My colleagues and I have been encouraged in recent days that a revenue-sharing measure is forthcoming that will benefit our coastal oil- and gas-producing states. Hopefully, we'll be able to get this done this year, just as we have helped Alaska today."


She can kiss any national aspirations goodbye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. what a dumbass.... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jo March Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. "revenue-sharing measure"?!? WTF?
Does she mean that she will get a portion of the 30 pieces of silver?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. so reTHUGlicans BOUGHT her vote with simple PROMISES...


my bet is that the reTHUGlicans will NEVER carry through with their promised GIANT REVENUE SHARING measure..."forthcoming?" hahahaha



reTHUGlicans DUPED senator landrieu with one of the OLDEST political TRICKS...and she bought it...hook, line, and sinker....


there's not any of that Alaskan OIL that works it's way down to Lousiana....she should have read up on the matter, and refused to be BRIBED with only faux promises....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. She is toast. Whom the Republicans recruit, they target.
She will find herself without a Democratic base with a Republican moderate to fight. Good-Bye. This is not a wish to see her defeated, but Chamberlain can tell you, appeasement does not a constituency make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jo March Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. And another thing - she didn't "help" Alaska today!
Dammit! Dammit! Will they squander all that is precious for money?! Is nothing sacred to these people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's typical.
We want money!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snotcicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Whats this we shit, all the revenues will end up in a Waltons pocket n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC