LOL - Freepers dispondent over Fed Judge in Schaivo case

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1367185/posts?q=1&&page=1

So much for the rapid fire "right to life" march.

Does anyone have information on any rulings this guy has made?

that's all they need to hear.

They were absolutely certain this was going to happen.

Add that he is a Clinton appointee and watch heads explode. Their little unconstitutional jihad has failed and they know it.

It's so blatantly unconstitutional it makes me want to scream.

....that what was done is legal under Article III of the US Constitution. Take a look and let me know what you think...

because it is not a constitutional issue and not a law of the US meaning a federal law. there is no federal law here.

this case asks the court to decide what Terry would want. The court heard the evidence and made a decision which has been upheld.

"An ex post facto law is a law passed after the occurrence of an event or action which retrospectively changes the legal consequences of the event or action."

http://www.lectlaw.com/def/e086.htm

That would be much more helpful.

Somehow I get a feeling there's some judge they'll find who will hear this case and order some kinda stay...just to help their political bosses save face here. I don't think the wingnuts in DeLay, Inc. would go this far if they didn't think they could cook the books at least on the District Court level.

Or, maybe, just like the Clinton case, now the case will be appealed (yet again) and some panel (packed with Repugnicans) will make some ruling that will send this thing to the Supreme Court. Fortunately there I expect this sham to finally end, but in the meantime it will create more manufactured news for the corporate media, red meat for the Repugnicans with their fundie base and continued agony for Michael Schiavo and millions who face a similar plight.

that the judge isn't some corrupt Federalist, would have shot this down also. In fact the judge, in Florida, who most recently ruled on this case, is a Republican judge.

Christians can be that way sometimes.

Again.

he will shoot it down... he wants to stay a judge I wager...

and security for federal judges has been increased of late.

there is a Mafia.

...is that if the judge pinpointed a time--he's all ready made his decision and that decision will be that the feeding tube remains--game over.

Scheduling a time leaves him little room for investigation, etc. I think he made a swift decision that this entire debacle was unconstitutional.

Again, maybe I'm wrong, but that's just my sense.

he would have immediately ordered the tube feeding resumed if he thought the case had any merit. I'm thinking the tube remains out but WTH do I know..

film at 11 :eyes:

they didn't get what they wanted in Californias gay marriage laws. The judge was a repub. roman catholic appointed by a republican, but he didn't side with their ideology so he is an activist judge. What morons.

Freeper Fairopinion hasn't a clue about fareness, its his way or the highway. Civil rights only matter if they are talking about taking his.

"He is a Clinton appointee and used to be a public defender, he only has compassion for criminals, not for innocent disabled women, who are being murdered, while he fiddles.

17 posted on 03/21/2005 7:50:36 AM PST by FairOpinion (http://www.helpterri.com)"

LOL!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x3314037

law enforcement officers at the scene. She has had run-ins with them already!

Here's one of them I'm sure..

salute in earlier pics of these folks. Do you know what it is?

When they don't get their way, they cry and pout until the next hot topic. It's pathetic.

n/t

bush & right wing hatred is helping create this atmosphere and here we are again.