Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who the fuck is Terri Schiavo?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:07 PM
Original message
Who the fuck is Terri Schiavo?
And why should I care?

There are scores of people dying in Iraq daily...and all this board cares about is some brain dead lady.

This case is simply a distraction from the war crimes we are still committing in Iraq. Why is DU taking the bait?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old Deuteronomy Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, we can CARE....
without having to make it a government issue -- and you are right... it is simply a decoy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. It may be a decoy at some level, but the case has...
much broader impact than Jacko's or Scotty's day in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good question
Some people take the sensational trial bait as well, and there seems to be a new big one every couple of months now.
Don't look at the man behind the curtain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because the repercussions are broader than one single
individual's case. Additionally, I'm seeing some Republicans extremely pissed off at one another over it and frankly, enjoying that aspect of it. The potential precedents set in this case are chilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. there's aLways room for
ter - ri - schi - a - vo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. In about a week or two she's be a right wing martyr
The republicans have no shame. This is not a political issue. It is between her doctors and her medical power of attorney (her husband.) This whole thing is sick and republicans should be ashamed for using this poor women to score political points and rally thier supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
6. You shouldn't care...except that
Edited on Mon Mar-21-05 01:20 PM by deadparrot
this is setting an extremely frightening precident.

If Congress doesn't like your or you next-of-kin's medical decisions concerning you, they can intervene against your own wishes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. The right to privacy issues are major.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thurgood Marshall Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. deadparrot
Dead on, parrot. Everyone needs to care, because this comes down to government intrusion in every decision a person should be able to make on their own.

Not to long ago, I would have supported Michael Schaivo giving up custody so Terri's parents could water their houseplant whenever they wanted to, but now doing so would let the cabal in Washington believe they won and they will try to extend their control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prattleon Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. I agree with you.
This is definitely small compared to what is still going on in Iraq. It's a tragedy that more people don't see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southsideirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. This year's Elian Gonzalez, is all. Another case for the nut balls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candle_bright Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. I can chew gum and walk at the same time
Why should anyone care about any individual, then, unless he or she dies in Iraq?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
33. Exactly.
I'm perfectly freakin' able to care about more than one thing at a time.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. You should care because at some point in the future
You may have a loved one who is long gone but kept alive artificially sucking every penny out of our pocket for years and years and years; been there, done that. Or you may be the one who is gone but laying in a vegetative state with a feeding tube stuck in you, bleeding your family dry of every penny because some religious zealots think you should "live." And if republicans get away with this for the sole purpose of placating their base what is next? I think we liberals are capable of multi-tasking - the war, schiavo, gannon, you name it. rove keeps throwing out the plates, we keep juggling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Only if you care about Democracy and how Wingnuts Are overthrowing it
Edited on Mon Mar-21-05 01:23 PM by UTUSN
Whoever said that ONE issue is ALL that matters? Guess what, Dems are MULTI-issue and we can do more than ONE at the same time. It's not about Terri SHIAVO. It's about Constitutional rights and how they are being subverted.

Also, throwing the F word in there ain't purty. And why aren't the board nannies attacking you for starting another SCHIAVO thread, and why DID you start a thread about something you don't care about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. I don't and ignore it
I hate it when the media starts a feeding frenzy and makes a mountain over a molehill story.

It happens far too much especially with the cable channels trying to fill airtime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
d_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. Awesome
Who the fuck is Terri Schiavo? - Johnny cougar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldcoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. Congress and the U.S. Constitution
The Schiavo case is not a distraction like the Blake or Jackson cases. Unfortunately, this case is far more significant.

When the Founding Fathers drafted the U.S. Constitution and created our form of government, they created a system of checks and balances to prevent any branch of the federal government from becoming too powerful. They also sought to preserve some of the individual powers of the state. Despite claiming to be the "states rights" party, the Republican majority in the U.S. Congress voted, along with their Democratic accomplices, to overturn the Florida judge's decision in Schiavo's case. Tragically, very few members spoke out against this abuse of power.

The arrogance of both the legislative and executive branches of our government is horrifying. As long as we have a congress and a president who believes the rules do not apply to them, we are in very big trouble. It is getting to a point where we can no longer rely on the U.S. Constitution to protect us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
18. she's someone who could be anyone of us
and that's why this is so damn important. The GOP Tallibannery wants to decide how we worship (forced pledges), who we marry (one man, one woman), what religion the government supports (the Ten Commandments on every lawn), and now how we die (when we say so). Do you honestly think that if the war ended tomorrow you'd be living in a free democratic utopia? I'm as worried about what this country is becoming -- and the loss of basic protection and liberties -- as I am about the war.
Don't minimize the Schivo issue. Its very serious business.

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I just don't understand how this could be an issue at all...
Maybe it was the Republicans that made an issue out of it. I really don't understand why they think people would care. It's a tragic situation, but things like that happen every day, every hour. It doesn't make sense that this is an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Why care? Just the idea that we have a right to self determination that
has now been violated by Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Why care? Just the idea that we have a right to self determination that
has now been violated by Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. I'll tell you why I care.
This was and should have remained a private family matter. Michael Schiavo, as Terri Schiavo's next of kin, had the legal right to make decisions on Terri's behalf. When there was a dispute between Michael Schiavo and Terri Schiavo's parents, it was correctly brought to the Florida court system and decided there.

Now the federal government has decided that the decisions of the FL court and the wishes of Mrs. Schiavo as described by her husband are of no account and they have taken it upon themselves to insert themselves where they don't belong. Dismantling of checks and balances, anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. It has "evolved" now
I'm beginning to get the feeling that the fundie extremists threatening Congress on a 1st Amendment 'right to life' issue is the real goal here.

It's not about a husband vs. wife or family decision. It's not about state's rights. It's not about an individual's right to privacy.

Bottom line? ..."Right-To-Life". Translation: Abortion constitutionally violates the right to life as demonstrated in the Schiavo case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. I don't get it either.
Other than the "precedent" thing, it really IS just another Rove-instructed distraction, just like celebrity trials, missing children, etc. We care more about this case than the war on the middle class and foreign peoples and that's kind of sorry if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I agree. Do people really believe that DeLay/Hassert/Frist care
Edited on Mon Mar-21-05 03:16 PM by katinmn
what happens to Terry Schiavo?

I mean - do they really care?

Nah! They wanted to stir up something that would take what teeny bit of awareness was growing on the war, the economy, oil, social security, banking "reform," outsourcing jobs and other issues and get them up all worked up over this sexy story.

It worked beautifully.

The Rethugs, including Bush, have no commitment to Terry Schiavo. They are using her like a pawn.

They'll drop her like a hot potato as soon as it becomes politically expedient, or another issue emerges that they can exploit.

It's all about controlling the minds of the people. They're one step ahead of most everyone.

edit: spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
22. This is not about one woman. This is about the destruction of civil
rights for Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American Tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
26. There are far broader implications than you realize.
I would normally share your viewpoint, if not for the recent involvement of the federal government. This could befall anyone here. Will they respect our wishes, and those of our designated next-of-kin?

It proves the disturbing power of the religious right.

I worked in clinical neuropsychology for years, up until fairly recently, and I was horrified when I saw this woman's CAT scan - never seen anything remotely like it in a 'living' human. Her cerebral cortex has disintegrated, and no significant recovery of function is possible at this point. I think I can safely estimate her IQ to be exactly 0.

Regardless of their political affiliation or even their voiced opinion on Schiavo, I don't know anybody who would want to be kept alive in this woman's mental condition, so I don't think it's unreasonable for her husband to conclude that Terri wouldn't want to exist like this. I wouldn't want someone I love to be trapped in a mindless shell like that either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. The federal govenment wouldn't have gotten involved
had this non-story been pushed by the media. It's like a downward spiral. The fascist media pushes a bullshit distraction story, people get all worked up, the Republicans see a chance to politically capitalize, and thus a political issue is made out of it, and the government then starts making diciions it has no business making.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. that's true, but
they did, and Congress did, and now we're getting fucked, big time. So if the question is should Terri Schiavo's situation become a big time story leading to grotesque Congressional intervention: answer is no. But if the question is whether Congress' grotesque intervention in this matter is a big time story -- the answer is no, because it means that nothing is sacred or safe from the GOP Taliban anymore.

onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. But they DID get involved. Just as Jeb Bush GOT involved.
This is a real issue that profoundly affects us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American Tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. The point is that we no longer have the luxury of ignoring it!
Are we to loftily refuse to dignify it with any response, as you seem to suggest? That tactic has certainly worked for the Democrats. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud_dem Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
43. self-deleted
Edited on Mon Mar-21-05 11:32 PM by proud_dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
27. It's 1955: Who the fuck is Rosa Parks and why should I care?
Edited on Mon Mar-21-05 03:56 PM by mondo joe
All this board cares about is some lady who didn't get the seat she wanted on the bus!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. I agree.
Can't people see the broader implications?

Of course there is bad shit happening in Iraq, but that doesn't nullify everything else that happens either.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drdon326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
35. A Human being with 2 Loving Parents
hope no one ever says "Who the fuck is JohnnyCougar?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. If I ever get like that...
please someone, pull the plug. Don't put me and my whole family through some circuis-like ordeal all while wasting money on medical bills.

And please, If you don't know me or my family, ask "Who the fuck is JohnnyCougar?" That's what you should be asking, since it is none of your business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. Yeah, loving like Bush loves America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
37. You shouldn't care. And neither should Congress.
But the fact that Congress cares means you should care, because they are going to rape the Constitution to prove their worth to their base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #39
62. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Your post is full of inaccurate information
Terri does not make eye contact or express emotion.

And you clearly know nothing about hospice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Not expensive?
What are you smoking?

A. Her parents are not taking care of her. They haven't taken care of her in years. As I understand it, she's on Medicaid.

B. People in her condition need a tremendous amount of care. They must be turned in bed, their lungs "treated" at least once a year.

C. It's estimated that death may occur within two weeks.

D. If she can swallow, why has she been on a feeding tube all these years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #38
45. If you're Johnny's mother, then why doesn't he know who TS is?
And did you see post #36?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. From what I observed, she had little respect for anyone else
And I have little sympathy for anyone who posts something like this:

"Punishments of death through various means of torture are not new/common acceptable ways of law enforcement for those people."

And thinks the man who engineered the massacre of 4,000 POWs might be good at "uniting the country."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=1275366#1275471



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Most of those posts have been deleted
And the age insults are so fucking lame. I am probably twice your age, as much as it pains me to admit it.

And she was indeed rationalizing torture, as anyone reading that sentence can understand. "Those people," indeed.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. I am not mischaracterizing anything--the words are right there
and can be fully comprehended by anyone with rudimentary reading skills.

For example, I'm really blown away by the courtesy and maturity and professional knowledge exhibited in this post, for example:

Do you never believe the person who is too lazy to walk or excercise, and stop themselves from stuffing their mouths with fast food or whatever they want has any share of responsibility for being obese?
What is gluttony? What is laziness? What is being fixated with oral gratification? What about these people who are "frequent flyers" in the hospitals who never comply with expert medical advise?
Are you blaming the pharmaceutical companies for those who have been prescribed important medication for their hearts and blood pressures yet do not take the medicine but go off their diets for fries and double whoppers?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=1318952&mesg_id=1323340

But maybe that was actually brother Jeff again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #59
60. Yes, it sounds very much like a compassionate nurse to me
Such empathy.

Well, at least the term "those people" was mercifully absent.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Radio_Lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
42. self delete
Edited on Mon Mar-21-05 11:13 PM by Radio_Lady
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
47. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
49. your point is very well taken
Edited on Tue Mar-22-05 03:37 PM by goodhue
IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
50. She's the political pawn that is being used to prompt the "nucular option"
pure and simple.

What's interseting is that it very well may backfire, even my republican aquantances think the radicals are dead wrong on this one.

The majority of the nation think the courts got it right. This should be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. This may be the one thing that makes me want to tolerate this.
Bush is clearly fumbling on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donailin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. "Bush is clearly fumbling on this issue."
as well as others. The social security plan is DOA. No one is buying it. The appointment of Wolfowitz is also worrying his base (not the religious base, the other base, the greedy base). The price of oil, the fall of the dollar, the budget deficit, the trade deficit, the medicare cuts, et al. Folks are talking, the folks that voted for him, that is.

Let us pray.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
65. Scaife & co is funding this nonsense
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x3324144


And it has gotten to where it could adversely affect the whole country - eroding the power of the judiciary and all.

It seems likely that Scaife and Co. have been funding this for more than just he distraction value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogindia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
70. distraction from peak oil, oil wars, and global warming and just
surviving on the planet.

But COMPASSION is very important. That may be way all the attention is about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
72. locking
Please consider refraining from letting personal attacks overwhelm a thread.

Thanks,

DU Mod
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC