Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OMG. If Jeb succeeds in taking custody here is what happens next

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:14 PM
Original message
OMG. If Jeb succeeds in taking custody here is what happens next
Edited on Wed Mar-23-05 07:15 PM by Proud2BAmurkin
They would stick the tube down Terri Schiavo's throat and within 24 hours they would be ordered to take it out again

The department shall, within 24 hours after providing or arranging for emergency removal of the vulnerable adult, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, petition the court for an order authorizing emergency protective services.

(c) Emergency medical treatment. --If, upon admission to a medical facility, it is the opinion of the medical staff that immediate medical treatment is necessary to prevent serious physical injury or death, and that such treatment does not violate a known health care advance directive prepared by the vulnerable adult,

HERE'S THE ENTIRE LAW

Fla. Stat. § 415.1051 (2004)

§ 415.1051. Protective services interventions when capacity to consent is lacking; nonemergencies; emergencies; orders; limitations

(1) NONEMERGENCY PROTECTIVE SERVICES INTERVENTIONS. --If the department has reasonable cause to believe that a vulnerable adult is being abused, neglected, or exploited and is in need of protective services but lacks the capacity to consent to protective services, the department shall petition the court for an order authorizing the provision of protective services.

(a) Nonemergency protective services petition. --The petition must state the name, age, and address of the vulnerable adult, allege specific facts sufficient to show that the vulnerable adult is in need of protective services and lacks the capacity to consent to them, and indicate the services needed.

(b) Notice. --Notice of the filing of the petition and a copy of the petition must be given to the vulnerable adult, to that person's spouse, guardian, and legal counsel, and, when known, to the adult children or next of kin of the vulnerable adult. Such notice must be given at least 5 days before the hearing.

(c) Hearing.

1. The court shall set the case for hearing within 14 days after the filing of the petition. The vulnerable adult and any person given notice of the filing of the petition have the right to be present at the hearing. The department must make reasonable efforts to ensure the presence of the vulnerable adult at the hearing.

2. The vulnerable adult has the right to be represented by legal counsel at the hearing. The court shall appoint legal counsel to represent a vulnerable adult who is without legal representation.

3. The court shall determine whether:

a. Protective services, including in-home services, are necessary.

b. The vulnerable adult lacks the capacity to consent to the provision of such services.

(d) Hearing findings. --If at the hearing the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the vulnerable adult is in need of protective services and lacks the capacity to consent, the court may issue an order authorizing the provision of protective services. If an order for protective services is issued, it must include a statement of the services to be provided and designate an individual or agency to be responsible for performing or obtaining the essential services on behalf of the vulnerable adult or otherwise consenting to protective services on behalf of the vulnerable adult.

(e) Continued protective services.

1. No more than 60 days after the date of the order authorizing the provision of protective services, the department shall petition the court to determine whether:

a. Protective services will be continued with the consent of the vulnerable adult pursuant to subsection (1);

b. Protective services will be continued for the vulnerable adult who lacks capacity;

c. Protective services will be discontinued; or

d. A petition for guardianship should be filed pursuant to chapter 744.

2. If the court determines that a petition for guardianship should be filed pursuant to chapter 744, the court, for good cause shown, may order continued protective services until it makes a determination regarding capacity.

(f) Costs. --The costs of services ordered under this section must be paid by the perpetrator if the perpetrator is financially able to do so; or by third-party reimbursement, if available. If the vulnerable adult is unable to pay for guardianship, application may be made to the public guardian for public guardianship services, if available.

(2) EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE SERVICES INTERVENTION. --If the department has reasonable cause to believe that a vulnerable adult is suffering from abuse or neglect that presents a risk of death or serious physical injury to the vulnerable adult and that the vulnerable adult lacks the capacity to consent to emergency protective services, the department may take action under this subsection. If the vulnerable adult has the capacity to consent and refuses consent to emergency protective services, emergency protective services may not be provided.

(a) Emergency entry of premises. --If, upon arrival at the scene of the incident, consent is not obtained for access to the alleged victim for purposes of conducting a protective investigation under this subsection and the department has reason to believe that the situation presents a risk of death or serious physical injury, a representative of the department and a law enforcement officer may forcibly enter the premises. If, after obtaining access to the alleged victim, it is determined through a personal assessment of the situation that no emergency exists and there is no basis for emergency protective services intervention under this subsection, the department shall terminate the emergency entry.

(b) Emergency removal from premises. --If it appears that the vulnerable adult lacks the capacity to consent to emergency protective services and that the vulnerable adult, from the personal observations of the representative of the department and specified medical personnel or law enforcement officers, is likely to incur a risk of death or serious physical injury if such person is not immediately removed from the premises, then the representative of the department shall transport or arrange for the transportation of the vulnerable adult to an appropriate medical or protective services facility in order to provide emergency protective services. Law enforcement personnel have a duty to transport when medical transportation is not available or needed and the vulnerable adult presents a threat of injury to self or others. If the vulnerable adult's caregiver or guardian is present, the protective investigator must seek the caregiver's or guardian's consent pursuant to subsection (4) before the vulnerable adult may be removed from the premises, unless the protective investigator suspects that the vulnerable adult's caregiver or guardian has caused the abuse, neglect, or exploitation. The department shall, within 24 hours after providing or arranging for emergency removal of the vulnerable adult, excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, petition the court for an order authorizing emergency protective services.

(c) Emergency medical treatment. --If, upon admission to a medical facility, it is the opinion of the medical staff that immediate medical treatment is necessary to prevent serious physical injury or death, and that such treatment does not violate a known health care advance directive prepared by the vulnerable adult, the medical facility may proceed with treatment to the vulnerable adult. If a person with legal authority to give consent for the provision of medical treatment to a vulnerable adult has not given or has refused to give such consent, examination and treatment must be limited to reasonable examination of the patient to determine the medical condition of the patient and treatment reasonably necessary to alleviate the emergency medical condition or to stabilize the patient pending court determination of the department's petition authorizing emergency protective services. Any person may seek an expedited judicial intervention under rule 5.900 of the Florida Probate Rules concerning medical treatment procedures.

(d) Emergency protective services petition. --A petition filed under this subsection must state the name, age, and address of the vulnerable adult and allege the facts constituting the emergency protective services intervention and subsequent removal of the vulnerable adult or provision of in-home services, the facts relating to the capacity of the vulnerable adult to consent to services, the efforts of the department to obtain consent, and the services needed or delivered.

(e) Notice. --Notice of the filing of the emergency protective services petition and a copy of the petition must be given to the vulnerable adult, to that person's spouse, to that person's guardian, if any, to legal counsel representing the vulnerable adult, and, when known, to adult children or next of kin of the vulnerable adult. Such notice must be given at least 24 hours before any hearing on the petition for emergency protective services.

(f) Hearing. --When emergency removal has occurred under this subsection, a hearing must be held within 4 days after the filing of the emergency protective services petition, excluding Saturday, Sunday, and legal holidays, to establish reasonable cause for grounds to continue emergency protective services.

1. The court shall determine, by clear and convincing evidence, whether an emergency existed which justified the emergency protective services intervention, whether the vulnerable adult is in need of emergency protective services, whether the vulnerable adult lacks the capacity to consent to emergency protective services, and whether:

a. Emergency protective services will continue with the consent of the vulnerable adult;

b. Emergency protective services will continue without the consent of the vulnerable adult; or

c. Emergency protective services will be discontinued.

2. The vulnerable adult has the right to be represented by legal counsel at the hearing. The court shall appoint legal counsel to represent a vulnerable adult who is without legal representation.

3. The department must make reasonable efforts to ensure the presence of the vulnerable adult at the hearing.

4. If an order to continue emergency protective services is issued, it must state the services to be provided and designate an individual or agency to be responsible for performing or obtaining the essential services, or otherwise consenting to protective services on behalf of the vulnerable adult.

(g) Continued emergency protective services.

1. Not more than 60 days after the date of the order authorizing the provision of emergency protective services, the department shall petition the court to determine whether:

a. Emergency protective services will be continued with the consent of the vulnerable adult;

b. Emergency protective services will be continued for the vulnerable adult who lacks capacity;

c. Emergency protective services will be discontinued; or

d. A petition should be filed under chapter 744.

2. If it is decided to file a petition under chapter 744, for good cause shown, the court may order continued emergency protective services until a determination is made by the court.

(h) Costs. --The costs of services ordered under this section must be paid by the perpetrator if the perpetrator is financially able to do so, or by third-party reimbursement, if available.

(3) PROTECTIVE SERVICES ORDER. --In ordering any protective services under this section, the court shall adhere to the following limitations:

(a) Only such protective services as are necessary to ameliorate the conditions creating the abuse, neglect, or exploitation may be ordered, and the court shall specifically designate the approved services in the order of the court.

(b) Protective services ordered may not include a change of residence, unless the court specifically finds such action is necessary to ameliorate the conditions creating the abuse, neglect, or exploitation and the court gives specific approval for such action in the order. Placement may be made to such facilities as adult family-care homes, assisted living facilities, or nursing homes, or to other appropriate facilities. Placement may not be made to facilities for the acutely mentally ill, except as provided in chapter 394.

(c) If an order to continue emergency protective services is issued, it must include the designation of an individual or agency to be responsible for performing or obtaining the essential services on behalf of the vulnerable adult or otherwise consenting to protective services on behalf of the vulnerable adult.

(4) PROTECTIVE SERVICES INTERVENTIONS WITH CAREGIVER OR GUARDIAN PRESENT.

(a) When a vulnerable adult who lacks the capacity to consent has been identified as the victim, the protective investigator must first request consent from the caregiver or guardian, if present, before providing protective services or protective supervision, unless the protective investigator suspects that the caregiver or guardian has caused the abuse, neglect, or exploitation.

(b) If the caregiver or guardian agrees to engage or provide services designed to prevent further abuse, neglect, or exploitation, the department may provide protective supervision.

(c) If the caregiver or guardian refuses to give consent or later withdraws consent to agreed-upon services, or otherwise fails to provide needed care and supervision, the department may provide emergency protective services as provided in subsection (2). If emergency protective services are so provided, the department must then petition the court for an order to provide emergency protective services under subsection (3).

(5) INTERFERENCE WITH COURT-ORDERED PROTECTIVE SERVICES. --When a court order exists authorizing protective services for a vulnerable adult who lacks capacity to consent and any person interferes with the provision of such court-ordered protective services, the appropriate law enforcement agency shall enforce the order of the court.

(6) LIMITATIONS. --This section does not limit in any way the authority of the court or a criminal justice officer, or any other duly appointed official, to intervene in emergency circumstances under existing statutes. This section does not limit the authority of any person to file a petition for guardianship under chapter 744.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tubbacheez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. This can't be good for Terri's throat tissue. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I hear it was direct thru the abdomen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I believe she has a gastrostomy tube
but you can, in an emergency, pass a naso-gastric tube.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. I believe the tube is still there,
just not in use. The tube remains in the woman, but is capped off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. yeah--surgery is needed for reinsertion
they bypass her throat, which doesn't work anymore (swallow reflex gone)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drdon326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. No.......Done endocopically....Swallowing act not important
Edited on Wed Mar-23-05 07:28 PM by drdon326


scope thru mouth into stomach

needle thru stomach

wire thru needle

grab wire by scope

pull out scope and wire


put feeding tube over wire thats exiting out of mouth

pull wire out of stomach with feeding tube attached

remove wire




easy...5 minute procedure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Any kid with a razor and TimeLife Do it Yourself book could do this.
That's how Tom Delay performed the lobotomy on himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. That explains it then
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. yes--he was actually trying for a hemorroidectomy
oops--they were in the same location
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Not in her nose, its in thru her belly button......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Her feeding tube
was installed via an incision in her stomach area. I do not think a through the nose and down the throat into the stomach could be tolerated for years without extensive damage.

180


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Tube goes in through an incision. I think all they would be able
to do is rehydrate her with IV's if they could find a doctor willing to be in contempt of court.

Jeb Bush is nuts. We need to make religious nutcase and Republican synonymous. The Repugs are pandering to a vocal minority and it is going to blow up in their faces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maveric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Its abdominal. They never put it down throats. Sometines via nose
which makes it an "NG" tube. Abdominally it a "G"tube.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tubbacheez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Thanks to all for the straight dope on this. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPoet64 Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. How can they justify "abuse?"
I'm just curious? What new evidence has cropped up to indicate abuse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Evidence? Why do you hate freedom? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Republicans don't have to obey law. Ask Tom DeLay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. I've been saying that for days. Just another distraction from the issue.
If there was a credible case for abuse - why bring it up now and not when it happened?

Also, I don't think you hate freedom, but I'm pretty sure you hate America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. The "abuse" is the "risk of death".
That's what they are using as justification. However, despite not needing a court order before taking custody, Judge Greer posted law enforcement at the hospice so that Jeb & Co. could not take custody. I don't see how DCF could take custody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPoet64 Donating Member (897 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Thanks for clarifying . . .
"Risk of death" obviously means risk of death in the case of someone who is not dying. This woman is in the process of dying so (legally speaking) there is no risk of death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. They are grasping at straws.
And death would be the outcome of not having the tube reinserted. So, there is a "risk of death".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. Terri did not have a written advance directive
If she becomes a ward of the state, they cannot pull the plug, due to conflict of interest. This is why they made that law in Texas and didn't terminate the parental rights of Sun's mother. Had they terminated her rights, and Sun become a ward of the State, they could not have pulled the plug.

Without direct consent from the individual or written directives, the state cannot pull the plug on anyone in their custody. It will appear as if they are killing off people to save the State money.

IF, they grant custody to the parents, it would be up to the parents of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. It says "without an advance directive." Doesn't have to be written.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Where does it say that?
and that such treatment does not violate a known health care advance directive prepared by the vulnerable adult,

It simply states that treatment will not be given IF it violates a known health care advance directive prepared by the vulnerable adult. There is no known health care directive.

She did not prepare a health care advance directive. The court determined that her wishes would not to be on life support but I do not think that qualifies as "preparing a health care directive."

There is a conflict of interest here for the State to pull the plug without a "prepared health care advance directive."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheModernTerrorist Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
16. cruel & unusual punishment anyone?
seriously... why are they putting this poor girl through this? It's times like this that I bet her husband wishes she had made a living will... cuz I sure as hell do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
22. All it will do is temporarily feed her and draw out the process.
These people are monsters. Even if they are right, its over, they lost, and now, on the off chance she can feel pain, they are going to make her relive the last 5 days again before letting her go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-05 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. 15 years ago, living wills were not that common
and not many people knew they existed. I know I didn't, so it's not surprising to me that there was none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
28. If he takes custody - I want to see Babs there right away to help out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC