Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Schaivo needs nourishment like WE all do

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 09:54 AM
Original message
Schaivo needs nourishment like WE all do
There are no machines keeping her alive. I have read that she is not "brain dead".

She is severely disabled/handicapped... THAT to me blurs the lines of what is right and what isn't

As long as all she needs is food to survive/live, then I could see the parents point. Although I must admit from what I have heard, I wouldn't want to be alive in that same condition.

Being severely disabled doesn't mean that you should die. It should be and option though and since Schaivo doesn't have a "living will", it comes down to a "he said, she said" situation.

I really feel sorry for all parties involved, but I don't understand all of the media attention on this and what actually is keeping this story alive and on the news day in and day out. While tragic, I don't consider this daily headline news. Blast me if you will, but I believe that this is a common occurrence. I believe that the more attention we pay to it makes us directly responsible for keeping the story alive.

I have seen so many posts on the DU on Shaivo, why don't we just make a separate forum listing/group for this topic since it seems to spark so much attention.

This whole situation is being used as a political football by both sides and I am sick of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. If you're sick of it, why start a whole new thread ?
"I really feel sorry for all parties involved, but I don't understand all of the media attention on this and what actually is keeping this story alive and on the news day in and day out. ...

I have seen so many posts on the DU on Shaivo, why don't we just make a separate forum listing/group for this topic since it seems to spark so much attention...

This whole situation is being used as a political football by both sides and I am sick of it."



:freak:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. If the topic is going to be so popular, then doesn't it deserve it's own
forum?

My opinion, is my opinion and obviously not the majority's opinio and in the scheme of things, doesn't really matter. So, as long as it is so popular - why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
34. a general opinion is different from a medical opinion
the whole point of contention IS the definition of her condition.

the only people privy to that are her doctors, nurses, and now of course, the courts.

since it's protected info, I don't know why anyone would voice an opinion based on what they've read.

people who make statements like this have absolutely no idea how many thousands (or hundreds of thousands) of people die like this in this country every year, by choice.

People sign living wills every day that specify they don't want artificial means of nutrition, because that quality of life for some is no life at all. I think Terri's parents are opposing this for religious reasons, because they think that is a form of suicide, and I think that fundies are against it for the same reason. I don't believe that, and I don't want wingnuts making this decision for me. (For them committing suicide means you burn in hell for eternity; I'm not worried about that, on the off chance they are right and the heaven/hell thing turns out to be the case, then I'd rather be in hell than spend eternity with those nutjobs).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gWbush is Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. you don't understand why??? -> because they want to get extremist judges
on the USSC

it's really obvious at this point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:02 AM
Original message
They want extremist judges - true - but that can easily be accomplished
w/o all of this coverage on this case can't it? Bush has done pretty well so far in the last 4 years, hasn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frankly_fedup2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
69. You're not serious? You cannot be serious? If you are serious maybe you
need an MRI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Afje Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:03 AM
Original message
Terry Shivo
I think they want to pave the way to abortion. The groups that foot the bill for the Schindler's endless court costs are Right to Life groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
23. Don't you think that this story is dominating the news to divert the
publics attention from other news stories that would affect their lives more directly and cause further deterioration of Bush's lagging support.

Don't you think that it may be possible that this story is purposely being kept in the forefront so that Bushco can regroup and refine his plan of attack on SS and other things?

Bush popularity ratings were suffering because of SS, now people are mainly paying attention to this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Afje Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #23
36. Bush's lagging support
I do not think that the Shivo case is used to divert attention away from issues that are troublesome to Bush. I don't think lack of public support on ANY issue troubles Bush. He pushes his agenda regardless of political cost to him, because he does not think he needs any. This is not a democracy anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #36
44. But don't you think that they use the media (Swiftboat Vets)
to divert the public's attention so that they can replot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Afje Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #44
49. The Plot
The plot as you call it, has been achieved - IMO. Fascism is most likely here, we just don't want to see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #49
63. SS reform is not getting support and Bushco is losing popularity
over it. So yes, they need to "plot" to get support and regain popularity. Besides if they fly beneath the radar, they can get some more of the plans implemented.

I still hold out hope for our country, although it grows dimmer as time goes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Afje Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #63
66. Getting support
Bush made it known to Dems. that they would suffer the political consequences if they don't support at least some aspect of his SS "reform". As if he could meter out consequences - or can he? Political consequences should lay in the hands of the voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gWbush is Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #23
54. To divert from other news stories??? >>> NO, you are wrong
Edited on Thu Mar-24-05 10:50 AM by gWbush is Mabus
the GOP controls all the news stories - they control the media.

they are not doing this to divert from other news stories.

if they wanted to divert from other news stories, all they have to do is not mention them in the first place.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Ah, black humor...
a tonic for cynicism.

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. New need for a new topic
This case is all over the news and blogs so it only makes sense that it also is a dominating factor here. This too shall pass.

What is keeping Terri alive is her brain stem. Her cereberal cortex no longer exists. It has been fundamentally replaced with spinal fluid.

Something else that should be noted is when they talk about feeding tubes, they aren't talking about a friendly glucose drip. Terri would be unable take nutrition orally.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Ignorance dominates me on brain function
what does the cerebral cortex do? And is there a continual deterioration of the brain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Cortex is all higher functioning.
It is memory, thinking, consciousness, and personality. The lower brain is breathing and circulation.

She's not home.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Thank you for the explanation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #9
29. Here's what she can't do:
She has no awareness, no emotions, no personality, no judgment, no concsiousness. She cannot even FORM A THOUGHT in her head, much less speak it. She most likely cannot hear, or sense touch, or smell or taste. She also cannot move voluntarily (on her own).

Everything that made her "Terri" is GONE. Permanently. You don't re-grow your brain. She is in a VERY bad situation. And it will not get better. If they re-inserted the tube, she would lie in that hospital bed until death from pneumonia or some other infection.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. She's not getting food, but a bagg of chemicals pumped into her.
And the feed tube IS life support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. Try reading the court-appointed guardian's report
Edited on Thu Mar-24-05 10:03 AM by Kelvin Mace
You can find a summary herem but read teh ENTIRE report.

http://www.thoughtcrimes.org/mt/archives/001986.html

Then come back here and post.

David Allen
www.thoughtcrimes.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. $5 says the poster won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #14
28. Excuse me, but I have already started AND I have it saved on my favorites
Edited on Thu Mar-24-05 10:18 AM by cidliz2004
for future referral.

Now who gets the $5 ?

P.S. It constantly amazes me that when someone goes against the grain and honestly questions something on a forum that is known as "The big tent party", people go on the attack so quickly and cannot seem to just "discuss/explain" positions.

Sometimes people just want things explained. I honestly had not paid a whole lot of attention to this case, I saw things on it here and there, but lately that is all that is on the news shows. So I figured it must be time to ask questions and get enlightened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. Your original post did not portray you as looking to "discuss/explain".
So don't blame me for your shortcomings in communication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #33
40. My main concerns were aroung the "feeding tube" and the
actual "classification" of her condition. Since someone "nicely" explained that feeding tubes are considered life support and that chemicals are being pumped into her, I now understand that part of it.

So, some people GOT my post and others like you didn't.

I still stick to my opinion that this story is simply a diversion from other things going on in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #40
52. There is nothing in your original post indicating you were open
for discussion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #52
64. "Blurring the lines...I wouldn't want to live....
those were the openings, besides most of the point of the post was the attention that the story seems to be getting. Not the ethical issue. I didn't say that I thought it was wrong for feeding tubes to be taken away. I didn't understand that the feeding tubes were technically thought of as "life support" and I didn't know the the feeding tubes had chemicals being pumped into her.

Some of the responses recognized my ignorance and educated me, they saw the uncertainty and responded appropriately.

By the way, I think that she be allowed to die.

I just want clarity on the terminology as far as ...disabled/vegtable/coma...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #64
71. She is in a persistent vegetative state
Edited on Thu Mar-24-05 02:08 PM by ultraist
She is not in a coma. All higher order thinking occurs in the cerebral cortex. Her cerebral cortex has disintegrated and the empty cavity is filled with spinal fluid. This means the only remaining functions of her brain are autonomic: reflexes, control of vitals (heart, lungs). Her capacities are similiar to a lower life form, a fish for instance. This is why she has a vacant look and is not responsive in any way. (ie Her eyes blink out of reflex).

Legally, she is disabled, profoundly disabled. But, this is not a disability rights issue in the way the fundies are twisting it to be. It's an end of life decision. Regardless, approx 70% of the disability activists community supports assisted suicide. Their stand is that NO ONE, including those with disabilities, should be denied their right to end medical treatment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #40
59. I think you give the Wingers too much credit
This thing has all the earmarks of a feeding frency for the Right. They have stopped thinking (even more than ususal) and are just riding this, not seeing that it is leading them over a cliff.

I really hope Jeb is stupid enough to kidnap Mrs. Schiavo. The backlash will be felt all the way to Dick Cheney's secret location.

Please let me know what you think after your read the report. Privately if you prefer.

David Allen
www.blackboxvoting.com
www.thoughtcrimes.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's not about what her parents want
or anyone else besides Terri Schaivo. The "he said/she said" is a they (2 others besides MS) said it is her wish. This is what her parents don't care about...HER wishes. Even if she had a written document, signed and legal, they would still be taking the same path.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Afje Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. Her wishes
Shivo's parents claim that her faith as a Catholic would not have allowed her to make such a wish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Can they prove it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Afje Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #22
39. Prove?
They don't need proof. They need doubt, and they got that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. Yes, PROVE. That's the way the law works. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Afje Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #43
50. The law works?
The law works in favor of those who make law. The newest example was the bankrupcy bill passed just a few weeks ago. I do not believe we are a Nation of Laws any longer. I really hope I'm wrong about everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #20
31. They couldn't prove that. And the decision has been upheld
19 times.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Afje Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #31
41. So then prove DOUBT.
Shivo's parents use the lack of a signed living will by Terry to create doubt on the courts decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #41
48. They didn't create doubt on the court's decision.
The parents 'doubted' the disagreement was heard in the court(s). Please show where there was 'doubt on the courts decision.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Afje Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #48
53. Congress!
The Right to Life groups that support the parents and the Media that feeds on this privat tragedy have created enough doubt that Congress stepped in. Court decisions they don't like are not respected. I'm not saying they have legal merits, I'm saying they want what they want and they want it now. And they have enough cloud/pull to make it so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #53
60. You said the Schindlers created doubt on the courts decision
Now you're saying the RTL groups.

I'm not disagreeing that RTL have manipulated this tragic personal family situation. They have created a powderkeg that I fear is ready to blow and Terri Schiavo's passing just may be the match that sparks it.

I also agree with you that they (the Schindlers but even moreso the religious extremist minority) don't respect court decisions that don't a) conform to their beliefs and b) force society to conform to their beliefs. They have created a Constitutional crisis and conflated every imagineable wedge issue into this. The heightened emotion is purposeful and calculated.

We seem to mostly agree on the Terri Schiavo situation. You've moved your original argument though from her parents claim it would be her wish. They would have to prove it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Afje Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #60
65. The Schindlers
I do not believe that the Schindlers have ulterior motives, they just grabbed on to the RTL groups (which I think have ulterior motives) because it lets them express a virtue central to THEIR lives, like defiance in the face of inevitable death.
I think at this point the parents would claim anything to be Terry's wish that is their wish. They almost treat Terry like their property.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
70. Mrs. Schiavo was not a particularly devoute Catholic
The court found "clear and convincing" evidence that Mrs. Schiavo would not want to exist in her current state.

This has been adjudicated over two dozen times now by about 16 diffrent judges.

Read the court transcripts or at least read the GAL's report, or at least a summary:

http://www.thoughtcrimes.org/mt/archives/001986.html

David Allen
www.blackboxvoting.com
www.thoughtcrimes.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. I don't think you can blame both sides.
It's pretty obvious which side is riding this.

Besides having no brain, her wishes were "clearly and convincingly" determined by the court.

The right wingers are riding this for right to life, judicial selection, and make democrats look like murderers, purposes.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
12. Did You See the Brain Scan?
I couldn't believe it. Right in the middle of her cortex there's an enormous cavity filled with fluid. Her brain looks like a doughnut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. A few things:
Here are facts. Not opinions, but indisputable facts:

1) The vast majority of medical institutions define the feeding tube as life support equipment.

2) By most accounts, Terri Schiavo is in a Persistent Vegitative State. There are no documented cases of recovery from this particular affliction, which is not the same as other coma conditions.

3) The issue at hand is not a he-said, she-said any longer. Perhaps the media portrays it as such, but it is not. The heart of the issue is "Did Terri Schiavo receive due process under law?" The answer is yes, as has been affirmed by nearly every court.

4) As far as "he said, she said" is concerned, the courts are the one and only arbitrator in cases where no living will is present. In this case, the courts served as a fact finding committee, and found that Terri Schiavo did in fact not want to be kept on life support. Whether or not you, or anyone else agrees, is irrelevant, because the courts are the final word on the issue.

5) Because of #4, it is no longer in Michael Schiavo's hands, and the court has ordered that it is the will of Terri Schiavo, and not Michael Schiavo or the Schindler's, to have Terri removed from the feeding tube.

6) Democrats are not politicizing the issue. They have stayed far, far away on this one. It is the Republicans and Evangelists that have gone off the deep end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Afje Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #13
30. gone off the deep end
It does not take much for Evangelicals to go off the deep end. They are going to take us all down with em. The very fact that it has gone so far already should be alarming to anybody who cares about the sep. of Church and State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. You're right, and i am very alarmed, however...
I think it's fad that is soon to see its end. Everyone was shaken up by 9/11, and when people are scared, they're driven towards religion. I think people are starting to see the problems and are getting sick of the religion overkill shoved down their throats. If there's one good thing to be said about American culture, it's that it is sometimes very convenient that we have such short attention spans for these sort of phenomenon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Afje Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #37
46. This phenomenon has been going on for 40 years
In my humble opinion this religious phenomenon got created by Civil Rights, and the poeple who don't like them. They've been at it for a long time and they have been able to gather support from unsuspecting Christians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #46
51. There has always been an element of religion in every society.
It'll never completely go away, however, I do think it will subside with some time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Afje Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #51
62. Element of religion in society
I don't want it to go away, I want it to stay in it's place - churches and homes, not Congress and Courts. I don't see anything wrong with religion as long as it does not dictate the course this country is taking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
16. I haven't seen any evidence
that she isn't in a persistive vegetative state. If you have evidence, provide a link (that isn't political in nature). If she is in a vegetative state, only brain impulses from the brain stem are in working order which means only her organs can function. This in practical purposes means that her brain condition is fatal without artificially inserting a tube to provide nutrients. It also means there is no discomfort or stress due to dehydration if the tube is removed. It also means there is no functioning or cognitively functioning person there, only organs that can function. If my information is incorrect, let me know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
17. Learn From Others
You've sucked a lot of kool-aid there about this story...not one based in the reality many, like myself, had had to face in similar situations.

Let's get this distortion cleared up. She's not suffering, can't eat, can't drink, can't chew, can't swallow...wouldn't know if she was being fed or not. Reattaching the tube just prolongs the suffering of all involved here and the end result will be the same...eventually she will die.

She's not severly disabled, like a handicapped person...she's a human pod with just a fraction of a brain that controls her breathing and vital signs...there's nothing else there, nothing that will be...she's braindead...her upper brain where the grey matter used to be is now just fluid. If you saw this poor shell of a person, you'd see a surreal image of "life".

If anything Democrats have stood by and said nothing while this farce rolls on. Few really got up in the House in that sham session and spoke loudly about how this issue is being used for partisan, divisive reasons...the epitome of cynicsm.

Now you should feel sorry for Terri...wish her 15 year limbo ends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
18. She is not DISABLED. A feeding tube is no different than a respirator.
Get educated about having no cerebrum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kinkistyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
21. She has no brain.
Hey, if you support keeping a brainless body alive by pumping food-products into her body and transporting poop away from it, I guess you live in a vastly different world than mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
24. So you just want to push aside the decision of ALL those courts,
all those judges, just blow all that judiciary action off, huh?

You know better, I suppose?

She has VERY LITTLE OF HER BRAIN LEFT. She CANNOT FEEL ANYTHING.

She WILL NEVER RECOVER.

Even YOU said you wouldn't want to be kept this way. My GOD, have a bit of compassion, a bit of mercy, we wouldn't put a feeding tube in a DOG that had very little of its brain left, that would be considered cruel.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #24
38. All that I am saying is that I think that this story is too politicized
and in the news way too much, diverting our attention from some things that are pulling Bush's popularity down.

I feel sorry for the whole family and I said that I wouldn't want to be alive in her state means that I think she should be allowed to die! I don't agree with her HAVING to be kept alive to appease the parents and the rightwing crazies.

I just didn't know if feeding her through a tube was considered "life support", I have had that since cleared up. And I did think that she was "disabled" because she doesn't have a terminal disease. Maybe the vocabulary is wrong. I am just trying to get the real information and different points of views from here instead of listening to endless talking heads and spin masters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #38
45. Well, you can thank the repukes for politicizing Terri.
They've been doing it since Jeb first stuck his nose in it a few years back, at the insistence of crazy groups like Randall Terry's Operation Rescue group, who also have no problem killing doctors.

Dems never DID poke their noses in this. Democrats believe this is a personal, private matter between families and doctors, and I agree.

And guess what? So does up to 70% of the public of ALL political affiliations.

If you are sick of the politicizing of it, start writing emails to Hannity, Scarborough, Limpballs, and all the elected repukes who have made a freaking CIRCUS of this woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #38
55. The agenda central to this case
is WHO DECIDES??? THAT is the BIG PICTURE. Do Americans have a right to privacy, free of inappropriate government intrusion? It's also about an INDEPENDENT judiciary. Terri's fate has been litigated to the point of absurdity. When does a judge's ruling stand? How about 19?

WHO is footing the bill for the Schindler's made-for-TV circus and WHY? What is THEIR AGENDA??? As you answer those questions for yourself you'll realize the underlying issues in this case do warrant serious attention.

Welcome to DU!!! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Afje Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #55
67. RTL agenda
I think the ultimate goal is a Christian theocracy for all those RTL groups, but I do not believe that their goal is shared by the global corporate elites. Corps want their own oligarchy, not Fundy land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
25. Yes, and the poor man taken off the ventilator needs air, just like we all
do. Let's just hook everyone up, that way no one ever has to really and truly die. I'm sorry but I disagree, and always will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #25
57. exactly. medically administer oxygen or H20/nutrients. no difference
Edited on Thu Mar-24-05 10:58 AM by ultraist
People who are saying it's different have yet to logically explain how medically administering one is ok, but medically administering the other is not.

People need oxygen just as much as they need h20/nutrients.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
26. You said: "I wouldn't want to be alive in that same condition."
Edited on Thu Mar-24-05 10:16 AM by Jersey Devil
That is the entire point. The court has found, after hearing all the evidence, that she wouldn't want to be alive in her condition.

The issue is not what her parents want or what her husband wants or what Tom Delay, Congress, Pres Bush, Gov Bush, the Christian right or anyone else wants. The only issue is what Terri Schiavo wants.

There is no requirement under Fla law that there be a living will and their law provides that if there is none that a court should determine the person's intent after hearing all the evidence. That is what has in fact happened. It has been appealed, appealed, appealed and appealed again and every time the appellate courts have said the trial court made the right decision.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drdon326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
27. FWIW...I agree with you.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
32. Terri needs the right to her choice like WE all do
I suggest you stop arguing against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
35. Her doctors, who did more than "read", disagree with you
They say she is in a persistive vegetative state. No hope for recovery. Her brain is mostly fluid now, and the parts of her brain that are responsible for thought and feeling do not exist anymore.

As well, her husband, who she actually knew personally before she chose him as her life partner, disagrees with you.

This is a personal family matter. What we "think" doesn't matter. Her doctors, her husband and ultimately the courts are all that matters. And the courts have repeatedly sided with Mr. Schiavo and her physicians over the past 7 yrs. This has been litigated to death.

The circus surrounding this is tragic and we should never be privy to the personal private issues this family is dealing with, yet we are. But the reason why this IS significant is because Congress passed an unconstitutional bill because the Republicans decided that they didn't like the rulings that the judges have given. THAT is a big problem and it becomes our problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #35
42. Thanks, I see how this translates into a higher question
The laws are being virtally ignored by the rightwing crazies.

What else is new? Pathetic isn't it? I am sad to say but if someone tells me that they are Republican, I just want to choke them.
I am becoming so angry about what they are doing that I cannot excuse ANY Republican for staying with that party anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
47. I get the sense that you've somehow missed several important clues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
56. OMG!
Edited on Thu Mar-24-05 10:59 AM by ultraist
She IS being kept alive by a machine. A feeding machine. She also had invasive surgery to have the tube inserted.

There is no difference between using technology to medically administer oxygen and using technology to medically administer H20/nutrients.

Those fundie nuts are now comparing her to an African American being denied to eat lunch at a counter due to his color. What a fucking SHAM! She is NOT being discriminated against.

So for, those freaks have tried to cry: feminism (she is an abused woman), disability rights, and now they are crying discrimination/segregation.

For fucks sake, now the fundie nuts are comparing her to Jesus who was ordered to death. FREAKS!

I'm glad they are getting so much coverage. It's giving people a chance to see how whacked out they are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #56
61. Next The Fuckers Will Be Trying To Get Her On A Stamp
What worthless shit stains these assfucks are. Meanwhile millions of children go hungry and starve to death eventually every god damn mother fucking day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
58. she needs a cerebral cortex first
it atrophied and was replaced by spinal fluid. There is no terri anymore, just a shell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelvin Mace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
68. I just posted a detailed debunking
of many myths being proferred by the Right.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x3341688

David Allen
www.blackboxvoting.com
www.thoughtcrimes.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC