Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

another scientist for the bush body count

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 12:10 PM
Original message
another scientist for the bush body count

http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=610618


U.S. to Probe Iraq Scientist's Death


The U.S. Army says it has reopened an investigation into the suspected bludgeoning death of a key Iraqi scientist in American custody, a chemist who allegedly experimented with poisons on prisoners in the days of Saddam Hussein.

Mohammad Munim al-Izmerly, 65, is the only known weapons scientist among at least 96 detainees who have died in U.S. custody in Iraq. Questions have surrounded the death ever since his body was dropped off at a Baghdad hospital in February 2004, two weeks after he died.

-snip-

When al-Izmerly's body was delivered to Al-Kharkh Hospital, the Americans enclosed a death certificate saying he died of "brainstem compression," without saying what caused it, Britain's Guardian newspaper reported after viewing the document last year. A subsequent Iraqi autopsy determined he was killed by a blunt trauma injury, a blow to the head, Iraqi doctors told Baghdad reporters.
-snip-
-----------------------------------


murder is a good way to shut up journalists and scientists if you are the bushgang. the bushgang can break any law they want - whose to stop them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do you want an Easter miracle
http://www.tompaine.com/articles/no_blood_on_our_hands.php
<snip>
In the spirit of Easter, might we at least hope for a resurrection of truth from President George W. Bush and those who work for him? Instead, what we hear is something like: “Renditions occur, it is true, and indeed to countries that torture. But we make sure to ask them if they intend to torture this particular person and they say, ‘No, of course not.’ And we, of course, believe them." We are asked to accept this type of statement as truth. Donald Rumsfeld certifies procedures which are plain and simple torture (not abuse), yet he meant them to be used only in Guantánamo— not in Iraq, for heaven’s sake. He is not responsible for what happened there. It’s those bad apples. All agree they must be punished, and they are. No blood on Rumsfeld’s hands.

Apparently, while he was White House counsel, Alberto Gonzales decided nothing, influenced nothing. He just passed on memos from the Justice Department to the president. No blood on his hands. And the president himself? He states to the world that the U.S. position on torture is never : to anyone, anywhere, any time for any reason. Yet he had signed the rendition order long before he made that statement on June 26, 2003. No blood on his hands.

If the Bush administration won’t stop torturing—and apparently they won’t—will they not, at least, stand up and tell the truth? The de facto policy of the Bush administration is to torture. Own up to it. Tell the truth. That indeed would be an Easter miracle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phoebe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-25-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. suspect probably knew too much about which company sold what and when
to Iraq during those years when Saddam was a CIA point man...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC