http://www.tompaine.com/articles/no_blood_on_our_hands.php<snip>
In the spirit of Easter, might we at least hope for a resurrection of truth from President George W. Bush and those who work for him? Instead, what we hear is something like: “Renditions occur, it is true, and indeed to countries that torture. But we make sure to ask them if they intend to torture this particular person and they say, ‘No, of course not.’ And we, of course, believe them." We are asked to accept this type of statement as truth. Donald Rumsfeld certifies procedures which are plain and simple torture (not abuse), yet he meant them to be used only in Guantánamo— not in Iraq, for heaven’s sake. He is not responsible for what happened there. It’s those bad apples. All agree they must be punished, and they are. No blood on Rumsfeld’s hands.
Apparently, while he was White House counsel, Alberto Gonzales decided nothing, influenced nothing. He just passed on memos from the Justice Department to the president. No blood on his hands. And the president himself? He states to the world that the U.S. position on torture is never : to anyone, anywhere, any time for any reason. Yet he had signed the rendition order long before he made that statement on June 26, 2003. No blood on his hands.
If the Bush administration won’t stop torturing—and apparently they won’t—will they not, at least, stand up and tell the truth? The de facto policy of the Bush administration is to torture. Own up to it. Tell the truth. That indeed would be an Easter miracle.