Earlier on
Live From interview with Kyra Phillips today:
Most sensible discussion of any spiritual leader to date in my opinion. He is now on live with Anderson Cooper. (Basically it was a repetition of what he said earlier)
PHILLIPS: I guess just for our viewers and to establish where you stand on this issue, first with regard to Terri Schiavo, do you believe that she should remain on a feeding tube, or do you think what is happening now is the right decision?
CHOPRA: I think what's happening now is the right decision, but let me also say that, you know, the very fact that there's so much controversy means that nobody is 100 percent sure. You know? Because, otherwise, there wouldn't be the controversy.
Freud once said the definition of neurosis is the inability to tolerate ambiguity, ambivalence and uncertainty. So we should start with saying we really in the ultimate don't know.
But having that said, life is defined by consciousness, by perception, by cognition, by emotions, by relationships, by behavior and by biology. In her case, there's only one component there that would signify that there is some life there, and that is biology. And moreover, it's autonomic nervous system that we're looking at.
You know, you can take a human heart out. You give it the right nutrition and it can beat for a long time. That doesn't mean it's living. That's not the definition of life.
I think what we're doing right now, by withdrawing this feeding tube, is actually alleviating the suffering of many, many people and, moreover, I think what the really bad about this whole thing is, that her life and her body have become a weapon of political exploitation. And that -- that's a very sad commentary on our times. PHILLIPS: That's a good point, and I want to talk more about that. But when we talk about Terri and is she suffering, because this is a word that has been used quite a bit lately. Is she suffering? And is she suffering mentally, physically or is she suffering more spiritually?
CHOPRA:
Well, she's not suffering because, you know, suffering is in consciousness, and in the absence of consciousness, there is no suffering. If anybody is suffering, it's her parents, who can't decide, you know, who are not so -- who are having anguish. Her husband and all of the people who are attached to very rigid points of view and belief systems. So her soul is already liberated. It's not localizing through her body, so there is nothing there that is suffering. There's an autonomic nervous system that is playing itself out. And that's only one component of how we define life. She is already liberated, and she is incubating non-locally so she can express herself again if you would just let her go.
CHOPRA: I think it's a great paradox, actually. You know, the suffering of Christ and the suffering of the pope are suffering examples of great dignity, which has meaning for the rest of the world.
The suffering, the so-called suffering of Terri Schiavo has no dignity there. What we're doing is keeping certain autonomic functions going in the absence of any life.
And I said earlier what has happened is that
Terri Schiavo has become a weapon, literally, for political exploitation and also exploitation by religious groups. And I think we are not actually interfering when we let nature take its course. Fifty years ago or a hundred years ago, we wouldn't have this kind of intervention, because nature would have taken its course anyway.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0503/25/lol.04.html