The Nazi Statements

Such hysterics. Your comments with regard to my interview of Mr. Ritter are incredibly interesting to me. I have been called many things, but given the fact that I am a Jew, a Jew who fled from the Ukraine; a Jew who lost family in the Holocaust, this latest assessment is highly creative but entirely offensive. The interview, I think speaks quite clearly and without quoting from any source (like Hitler, as you say) on neither my part or on the part of Mr. Ritter.

Clearly, minus brain cells, the new vanguard is to attack with hot button words in order to disrupt or better yet, to silence. Now, let me quickly put your mind to ease, or whatever is clearly lacking in your ability to process basic information:

NeoCons = Parasites, is not about Jews, it is not about Christians, in fact the analogy is about a body wholly absent of any "material" and applies to that "body's" motivation to simply control, and in this case, acquire power. I think Ritter makes quite clear that the NeoCons have no ideology, no religion, no allegiance to anything other than their own immediate power, thereby they latch on to anything that is currently providing that power. The Heritage Foundation is in fact the body that deployed their protégé to Iraq to help "rebuild" the country, in the process, losing 9 billion dollars. Sorry, but just because someone put "Compassionate Conservative" on their stationary, it does not make them a Christian.

I do not think Ritter or anyone sane person would ever call Rove an "innocent." What the host metaphor is about is that it provides the delivery mechanism. He is speaking of how the NeoCons function.

Now, only someone with their head stuck so far up Falwell's arse would infer that Jews, Christians, and Hitler were somehow part of this dialogue. What is part of this dialogue, in reference to the second interview, is the threat posed by NeoCons, as Ritter suggests, by using the term brown shirts. Hint this is not used to defend them; it is used to convey the danger of such extremism.

Mods please don't lock this thread. I wanted to respond to this ridiculous and crass assessment of my work, but you had already locked that thread.

THOSE OF YOU IN THE THREAD LISTED BELOW, I find your suggestion that I both interviewed a Nazi and am somehow spreading and supporting Nazi propaganda incredibly offensive. If you cannot read truth, then go back to watching Fox news where there is plenty of "The Jews are out to get Christmas" to help you in your quest to find hidden Nazi rhetoric and symbolism. And frankly, given with the subject of my piece and having at least done my research, I think I am comfortable in saying that I do not believe Mr. Ritter to be remotely a Nazi.

Good god, this is sick, but what this really is, by way of feigned concern, is just a disinfo campaign and I would suggest that you take a good look at anyone who posts simply to get a thread locked.

The rest of you sane and kind DUrs thank you kindly for recommending me for an award of any sort. I would just be happy to have some sanity back in this reality. LA

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=3356485&mesg_id=3356485

You can't call people out...

Statements in my work or intentions of a Nazi agenda in my work. I did not even get to respond there because they got it locked. So if this is locked, fine.

You can't start a thread to call someone out. You've got time left to edit out references to specific DUers if you'd like, though.

The title is better, no? Same point though, same people and I am pretty angry about that.

But you still name names in the post. Unless you remove those, this thread will be deleted.

Just curious

They are now "THOSE OF YOU IN THE THREAD LISTED BELOW"

I'm not a mod :)

Just trying to help you keep this one from getting shitcanned too.

This is still calling out.