Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Red facts" and "blue facts"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-26-05 10:43 PM
Original message
"Red facts" and "blue facts"
The Schiavo case demonstrates the problem of partisan epistemology. We now have "red facts" and "blue facts." Newspapers -- hoping not to upset either faction of their potential circulation -- have no intention in taking sides in such disputes. Thus two competing sets of claims, two very different sets of facts, two opposing narratives, are treated as equally valid. News reporters, unlike sports reporters, feel no responsibility to check the scoreboard, or even to acknowledge that there is a scoreboard. They tend to deny the possibility that a scoreboard might even exist.

In the case of Terry Schiavo there is such a scoreboard, and what it tells us is nowhere near as murky and ambiguous as the AP's Q&Q or CNN's vapid, incurious coverage would suggest. The facts of the matter have been hashed out, again and again and again, in court.

Congress and President Bush, like the absurd hypothetical Gonzaga fans above, would prefer that the facts were other than they are. They have, therefore, declared by legislative fiat that the scoreboard be reset to zero and that the game be replayed. Here, however, the sporting analogy breaks down. If the Red Raiders and Bulldogs were to replay their game, the result might be different. But the facts of the Schiavo case will not change, no matter how many times these facts are replayed and reviewed.

http://slacktivist.typepad.com/slacktivist/2005/03/whats_the_score.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
illflem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-26-05 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Some red/blue facts
According to the July 2004 census:
the 44 Democratic Senators now in Congress represent 148,026,027 Americans, while the current 55 Republican Senators only represent 144,765,157 (you can split the 310,000 Americans represented by independent Senator Jeffords, but that is being charitable to the reds).

If not for the illegal redistricting of the house of representatives by the soon to be felon, Tom DeLay, the republicans wouldn't even control the house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-26-05 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This should be its own thread
Really, how many people, even on DU, know that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illflem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-26-05 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It was, but with little response
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Repost it!
Word the body just like you did in this thread, but come up with a catchier title. Maybe something like Dems represent more people in Congress than repukes do!!! Or something. Just an idea; your original post was great, but sometimes people won't click on if they can't figure out what it's about immediately. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-27-05 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC