YESS!!! KEITH going to talk about DeLays THREAT!!

GO KEITH!!

One of only a few actual news people who will report the truth

Keith is a strong reporter for truth. He rocks. BTW very pretty dog :)

by the fireplace" thread instead of posting this everywhere? If not, could you at least photoshop out the electrical cord?

The electric cord is what makes the photo for me! I don't even notice the dog!

I'm going to call the Schindlers and Randall Terry, and we're going to surround DU headquarters so that the plug isn't pulled and the cord removed.

TlalocW

:rofl:

the term "cruise missile" was coined.

Development on the Snark started in 1946, with the construction and testing of a missile designated N-25. New range and payload requirements in 1951 caused Northrop to revisit the N-25 design. The new vehicle was christened the N-69. N-25s and N-69s were launched from Cape Canaveral starting in 1952, with testing on the production model (the SM-62) starting in 1956.

The Snark did not necessarily have to impact a target to terminate the flight: it came equipped with landing skids, allowing the same vehicle to be launched several times. At Cape Canaveral, many Snarks were landed on the Skid Strip after testing. Of course, many Snarks did not skid to a landing or impact their target: the Snark program encountered its share of problems, and amassed what many consider to be a less-than-enviable flight record. The number of Snarks crashing in the ocean led to warnings about "Snark infested waters". In a memorable incident in 1956, a Snark flew too far and refused its destruct command, and disappeared over Brazil (a Miami newspaper reported "They shot a Snark into the air, it fell to the earth they know not where."). The missing missile was found by a Brazilian farmer in 1983.

The Snark was deployed in 1959, with the activation of the Air Force's first missile wing: the 702nd Strategic Missile Wing based in Presque Isle, Maine. The first Snark went on alert at Presque Isle in March on 1960, and the 702nd was fully operational by February of 1961. One month later, President Kennedy declared the Snark to be "obsolete and of marginal military value." They were phased out immediately, and the 702nd was inactivated in June of that year.



Snark specifications and performance
Length 69 ft. Wingspan 42 ft.
Thrust Sustainer: 11,500 lbs.
Booster: 2 x 130,000 lbs. Speed Mach .94
Ceiling 60,000+ ft. Range 6,300 miles
Warhead Nuclear (W-39 thermonuclear, 4 MT yield)

I took them out after there was heavy traffic at DU in order to save bandwidth.

I say leave it in. It's a beautiful dog and looks like my Beau.

N/T

Good name. :-)

Hence the "posting this everywhere" thing.

I believe it's call a sig picture

It's not a signature, because I have the display of signatures turned off in my preferences, and I still see it. I have signatures turned off so that I don't have to look at that stuff, but since it's there, I'm assuming that the code is explicitly placed.

Ick.

if you don't like the picture of my dog that's fine, but you don't have to be nasty.

Others on DU post larger and somewhat more bizzare pictures as part of their sig line as is their right. If I don't like them I simply ignore them. I suggest you do the same if mine offends you.

I have sigs turned off so as to be able to ignore them and I can still see your picture. Pretty dog btw, but do double check how you have set this up - if it's a sig, like others here use, I would not be able to see it.

Thanks.

I'll give you $20 for the pelt (with ears on of course).

I love them, the most magical, loving and wise creatures.

One can only assume he is referring to the afformentioned 'syndicate' aka the people standing between him and power.

son of a bitch. He better have a living will to keep his sorry ass hooked up in perpetuity just to keep his day of reckoning as a coal shoveller in the nether regions away.

but was a little disappointed he said Terri Schindler-Schiavo.
She never hyphenated her name and I have only heard the Rethugs do it.
:(

by Tucker Carlson

earlier post: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=3392439#


http://www.kliljedahl.net

Wha? :crazy: No more Keith?

Carlson will be following him. Scarborough is being replaced.

Scarborough is no loss... that's for sure.