Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Open Warfare Amongst Bush Team

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WEagle Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 07:01 AM
Original message
Open Warfare Amongst Bush Team
http://commondreams.org/headlines03/0712-02.htm


Published on Saturday, July 12, 2003 by the Times/UK
Bush Team Split as CIA Becomes the Fall Guy
by Tim Reid in Washington

ONE BY ONE, all the President’s men rounded on George Tenet yesterday, forcing the CIA Director to issue a resounding mea culpa that is likely to bring his career to an abrupt end.

The first salvo in what degenerated into open warfare within the Bush Administration was fired by the President himself, blaming the CIA for the inclusion of a false claim about Iraq’s nuclear weapons program in his State of the Union address last January.

The extraordinary public blame Mr Bush heaped upon the agency was underscored by Condoleezza Rice, his National Security Adviser, who summoned reporters covering Mr Bush’s Africa tour to tell them that the CIA had “cleared the speech in its entirety”.

Their finger-pointing exposed the bitter blame game raging within the Administration as the issue of Saddam Hussein’s alleged weapons of mass destruction finally caught fire in Washington.

It capped one of the worst weeks Mr Bush has endured since the September 11 attacks and put the normally sure-footed White House on the defensive as it struggled to protect the President from allegations that he he may have knowingly lied to the American public.The Oval Office’s attack on the CIA caused a sensation on Capitol Hill, and brought calls from Democrats for a congressional investigation. The internal warfare was triggered by last week’s White House admission that Mr Bush was wrong to have claimed in his State of the Union speech that Iraq had tried to buy uranium from Africa. That claim was based on intelligence reports that Saddam sought nuclear material from Niger.

-more-

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
baffie Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. We need to counteract their continued lies
As often as Rice et al say that the SOTU has been cleared, we have to say twice as often that it has NOT been cleared, and that Tenet's speech says he merely did not prevent them from telling a lie they were determined to tell.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WEagle Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. don't forget
the verifiable "untruth" about the aluminum tubes in the Scam of the union address.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Rice said the CIA didn't TELL them to remove the line.
Silly woman. She thinks we're stupid enought to think the CIA GIVES the orders, instead of advising the gang on what they know and then standing around to TAKE orders.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9215 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-13-03 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. That is exactly what I
was saying after hearing her statement. It sure sounds like she is expecting the CIA to give the orders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC