Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It would be hard to top the amazing success of 9-11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 06:57 AM
Original message
It would be hard to top the amazing success of 9-11
It was all just so monumentally fortunate and profitable for bush and the planners of the deed, whoever they were.

And I can't imagine how they could possibly top the astoundingly successful tragedy.

One day of horror, broadcast on live t.v., and bada boom, we're all fucked.

It's just flat out amazing, there's really no need to go through another one, that one did the trick in spades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. "there's really no need to go through another one, that one did the trick
Hope your right. Still, we're stuck with a war that many have stated will "last the rest of our liftimes". However long or short that might be.

I just hope we make it past June.


:bounce: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :dunce: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :nuke: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. One more will be required.
if the Bush Junta wishes to institute the draft in order to change the regimes of Syria and Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. could be
wouldn't put it past them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. You think Social Security hurt Bush?
Edited on Tue Apr-26-05 07:57 AM by DoYouEverWonder
Just wait until he tries to reinstate the draft. All those gunho freeper college kids are going to have a shit fits, not to mention their parents.

That's why I harass them every chance I get. I want to know why they are still here and not in Iraq fighting for their president's war? Then I watch them get all uppity. It's so much fun.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. But, if there is a MAJOR event
say, 500,000 dead (which is what I anticipate the next event will entail) AND there is 24/7/365 coverage of the horror and heroism and it is presented as an act of terrorist war--another "attack on Amu'ka"--NO ONE will be allowed to oppose a draft. It will be presented as absolutely necessary, vital to the national security, UNPATRIOTIC to oppose, etc.

Things won't be the way they are now--which is bade enough--they will be much much worse. They will, if need be, institute martial law. They've already made this quite clear.

These fascist fucks are not going to stop until they have everything they want--and that is to put an end to this Republic. They're already well on their way to succeeding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Syria's already folded. Iran will be a far tougher nut to crack.
Assad Jr. isn't made of the same stern stuff as his late father. He's 26, and really should hand power over to more experienced hands.

I wish that the bright guys in Rummy's brain trust understood that getting rid of the Baathists isn't necessarily such a good idea -- you're left with rule by religious parties.

All of the remaining contenders for power in the region are now theocratically dominated regimes. They are contenders for God's grace who view the world through a Koran vs. Torah vs. Bible lense. Exactly the same for the Likud military-theological strategists. Include the American Neocons and fundamentalists with that bunch. Having removed the buffer of a secular force in the Middle East (particularly a viable Labour Party in Israel), we're likely to end up in the middle of a religious war fought with nuclear and chemical/biological weapons.

Anyone who thinks that Iran is going to be bluffed or bullied into giving up is out of their mind. Anyone who really believes that such a war can be "won" is, by definition, unfit for a responsible position of command.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Correction - Bashar Assad was 34 when his father died in June 2000
Bashar doesn't seem old enough to be President, as technically he still isn't. After he inherited power, the Syrian constitution was amended. It had set the minimum age for President at 40.

After limited, short-lived steps at reform, Syria retreated into the state of emergency rule that has been ongoing since 1963.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. I like the creative thinking involved in explaining how it all happened.
It is now a given that 19 Arab terrorists armed with nothing but boxcutters hijacked four different planes, with no one intercepting them and flying through one of the most heavily defended aircorridors in the world with no training in flying and slamming those planes precisely where they wanted.

That all the "facts" of these 19 men were created by Ashcroft, one of the original sinners of the PNAC, seems to have escaped notice.There is no other evidence for this than Ashcroft's word. Of course, Barbara Olsen, another rabid Republican Right Wing Doll happened to be flying on one of these planes and happened to make a clear cell phone call to her husband, Teddy, who coincidentally was also one of the PNAC men.I don't care what any one says.Try making a clear understandable cell phone call from a flying aircraft.

Can any of us come up with a better piece of fiction than this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. gimmee that old time delusion, gimmee that old time delusion
gimmee that old time delusion,
it's good enough for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theres-a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yee-ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PKG Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. Seems to me you've got plenty of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. it's good enough for me, why ain't it good enough for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Don't base your argument on the cell phone angle.
My wife called me during final approach to Reagan National a couple months ago. Her call came through while we were still in the air. It's a matter of altitude, and with the plane's transponder turned off, I can see how Olson's cell phone conversation and other calls reported were entirely possible.:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. At the time 9/11 happened I understand that such calls from high altitudes
Edited on Tue Apr-26-05 09:22 AM by KlatooBNikto
especially the one Barbara Olsen was flying in at 30K feet were not possible.It was only sometime during the past year that the FAA and the FCC authorized the protocols for such calls.

On Edit: Because this was disclosed,the administration was trying to backtrack on its claim about Barbara Olsen's cellphone call and claimed it must have been a call placed from her phone in the seatback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. My understanding is that Olson's call was late in the flight, which
was at low altitude, <5000 feet over DC and then a rapid, spiralling descent in Flt. 77's diving approach to the southwest side of the Pentagon. Do you have a link for your information?

Further, I don't think anything has technically changed yet regarding cell phone protocols. There's sill resistance by some of the airlines, as they'd lose revenue from the present in-flight call service.

I've tried to avoid technical arguments such as this, because I am not an expert in these matters. Just wanted to let you know it is possible to get a cell phone call in flight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yes it is.But not from the situation that Olsen was in. That was the main
reason that they backtracked on their claim. I will try and find that link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. What do you mean, "whoever they are.." Follow the money straight up
the steps of the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. Nominated & Kicked!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC