Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RNC finds Bush-Reid tit-for-tat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MsUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 01:20 PM
Original message
RNC finds Bush-Reid tit-for-tat
The Republican National Committee (RNC) has resurrected a bill Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) sponsored when he was in the House more than 20 years ago that would have kept members of Congress out of the Social Security program.

RNC researchers contend that the 1983 bill belies Reid’s repeated claim that Social Security is the “most successful program in the history of the world.”

The Republican salvo is in response to Democrats’ frequent use of a statement President Bush made in 1978 during his unsuccessful campaign for Congress that Social Security will “go bust in 10 years unless there are some changes.”

As the battle over Social Security reaches a fever pitch — complete with tens of millions of dollars spent by the opposing sides on television ads and the mobilization of thousands of volunteers to conduct grassroots campaigns — Bush and Reid have emerged as the principal adversaries, resembling candidates locked in a tight race.

http://www.thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/042605/rnc.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tight Race?
Bush is losing this race big time. What is "The Hill" smoking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-05 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. the sure threw a lot of anti-reid crap in that article
lots of stupid rnc lies, like the very last paragraph.
they just toss in that republicans accuse reid of "contradictions", then they supply one such "contradiction" without questioning it.

namely, reid has stated both that saving social security is important and also that there is no social security crisis. supposedly, this is a contradiction. and presented as such, without comment or explanation, it sure seems like it.

in truth, there only appears to be a contradiction when you take these two points and put them up next to each other without explanation. how about, social security needs saving FROM REPUBLICANS? or how about explaining that saving social security requires routine tweaks and this is not a crisis situation?

sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC