Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Meth vs. Crack

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 01:13 PM
Original message
Meth vs. Crack
It shouldn't but it amazes me at how quickly the methamphetamine epidemic has been addressed and the resources put towards ending it. I think that is great but compared to how the beginning of the crack epidemic it is a real eye opener.

This ABC link is to a story about how pseudophedrine is not only now being kept behind pharmacy counters (some requiring ID and signing a form-not mentioned in this article but on the ABC WNT report). Also the drug manufacturors are re-designing their drugs to no longer contain the ingredients needed to make meth.

More Retailers Limit Cold Medicine Access
http://www.abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory?id=709739
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
quispquake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gee I expected to see a poll...
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Meth is made in people's basements
Crack was imported by the CIA.

There's the explanation. As in all things, the first thing to ask is 'Who profits?'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Not necessarily
Edited on Fri Apr-29-05 02:30 PM by MountainLaurel
Meth is made in basements, and apartments, and trailers in the desert, but the bulk of U.S. supply comes from huge labs in Mexico.

But it actually got its start in this country as an unofficially sanctioned stimulant given to truck drivers and the military (the drug was created by the Nazis to create a better soldier). Even today, under-the-table use in the meat-packing industry, where most of the workers are illegal immigrants who fear they will get deported if they say no to management, is a huge problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. That's interesting
Do you by chance have something I could find to document that? Not that I doubt it, but I'm a journalist and it would make an interesting story. You can PM me if you something. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do we need to look at who the users are to see why?
Aren't meth labs springing up all over the (white) heartland and isn't crack use portrayed as a problem in AA communities?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Meth labs ARE all over the heartland
My county is full of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Heck, they just busted one in an apartment in the building next door
In downtown Chicago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeeBGBz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Yeah, the neighborhood down the road from me
Is known as "Tweak Mountain".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. While it's new to the national conciousness
The meth problem is nothing new. I know it's been a problem here in Sacramento since the 80's.

Nothing got done until it became an issue in the square states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. "They called her Amphetamine Annie--always shoveling snow"
It was around long before the 80's. But the heartland is being polluted with the "new" fad.

Crack was considered an "urban" problem--understood to be African-American. Not true, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Posts #3 and 4 sum it up to me
See the last post too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Meth is created domestically, cocaine is imported.
Any hick with a room and some over the counter drug store supplies can make meth. Crack is poor man's free base, and requires cocaine, which is big international business. Too many people make money on crack for it to ever be eliminated. Meth won't actually be eliminated, but they can bust enough individual suppliers to make it look like they are getting something accomplished. And the prison industrial complex gets paid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm not so sure.....
I would say both are very similar in that it wasn't until the problem was at epidemic levels that it was even addressed.

Crystal meth has been a huge problem in alot of parts of the country for at least a decade(2 or more in some places) now.

San Diego County used to be qualified as a "source nation" for crystal by the DEA.

Watched it grab and destroy a friend recently whose only now trying to put the pieces together.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Interestingly, the drug companies lobbied heavily against laws to require
pseudoephedrine products to be kept out of easy access.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's also why the herb, Ephedra, was really banned a few years ago
It's much easier and cheaper to extract ephedrine from ephedra and synthesize methyl amphetamine from that than to go the allergy remedy route.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. think prohibition
Edited on Fri Apr-29-05 01:36 PM by slaveplanet
think about the criminals , who profitted
think about how they eliminated competitors
think about consolidated control

think about the war on drugs
anytime these scum declare a war on something , you will see nothing but more of what they claim to declare war on....

It is by design....they own the blackmarket, they own the prisons
cash is made in distribution, it is made on the crackdown end , it is made from the taxpayers, it is made from the slave labor that drives down wages. It is all the same evildoers. Both coming and going.

Meth is out of their control. They don't like that fact. That will change....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LdyGuique Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. What I find more telling is the sheer number of people
who self-medicate to an addiction level in order to avoid psychic and emotional pain. If the gov is ever successful at getting all of these various addictions under control, it may be very surprised at the rage that will surface all across the country. There are a lot of disillusioned and angry people who are in major denial about the propaganda we've been fed for a lifetime versus the reality of our various worlds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Dig deeper and you always find the roots...
The self-medication angle is NEVER talked about. If any reasons why the stuff is popular are ever mentioned, it's always some bullshit about people "Thrill-Seeking" or some such.
Never crosses the page that perhaps they're trying to make the pain of trying to survive on $6 an hour in Dumbya's Murka go away for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uncle ray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. wow, you're usually so "right"!
what happened this time?

quick response? i think you forgot the bleeding sarcasm smilie. i'm only 30, and a full third of my life i've been aware of the meth epidemic, i've been around long enough to have had friends that have been hooked for years, and managed to move on past their meth addictions. and it's been going on much longer than my ignorant self has been aware.

the approach is completely wrong, removing some cold medicines from store shelves isn't going to stop the problem. it will do more to ensure the meth that IS cooked contains more WORSE industrial chemicals than the pseudoefidrene or whatever, McGuyver's got nothing on meth cooks. meth is like other hard drugs, it's not the "good" stuff that kills people, its the shitty stuff made from shitty chemicals in a shitty lab.

a much more far out, but likely effective solution, end marijuana prohibibition, most pot smokers are VERY much aganst meth use, as well as other damaging drugs, but as long as the police are enforcing pot laws, they will get ZERO support from the pot culture in the drug war. come clean, make it clear to the pot smokers etc. that you recognize which drugs are actually dangerous and which aren't and you might get a little cooperation, but as long as we continue to lump all drug users in the same category, it's hopeless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. -
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. You're not the only one noticing
Several years ago I spent time working with a federal task force focused on methamphetamine. In one of the public hearings, one of the members from the public health sector asked a representative of NIDA why, if the same indicator and warning systems were in place 15 years before, the crack epidemic did not raise any government attention. Dude literally stuttered an answer (basically, "I have no clue").

During the three years I worked on the project, I referred to it as the "White Kids in the Midwest are doing hard drugs . . . we must do something!" report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. I don't agree with you here, underpants
Though I usually do.

Tweekers have been around a very long time.

The locking-up of pseudoephedrine is at least 20 years too late. I had friends who were totally fucked up on this drug in 1983, young parents who destroyed their own lives as well as the lives of their babies.

I hear racial overtones in threads like these (not you) where meth is a "white" drug and crack is a "bad" drug. In the real world, they are both "poor" drugs. Damn all the purveyors of this shit. I despise them.

That's my two bits. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frictionlessO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
23. I used to have a serious meth problem. I hope none hold it against me.
Edited on Fri Apr-29-05 04:01 PM by frictionlessO
The main reason I used it and all of the other tweakers I knew that used it was really quite simple and uhmmm well stupid.

We did it to get more shit done. Why? Because we were poor and the more hours you could work the more money you had. It was stupid because the more you worked the more meth you bought. Vicious cycles only serve the tweakers cause to more cycles.

Adding insult to injury is that most meth users who start off snorting or shooting clean and pure crystal eventually lose contacts (arrest, death and running away) to the "good" stuff and have to buy more and more "cut" shit which is what crank really is. Crank is nasty nasty nasty stuff that goes from horrid to soul scaring real fast. Crank is the crap most people usually just smoke cause it is so nasty and bad that you cant snort it or shoot it. Crank whether its unrefined or just cut is what will really put the damage on.

Pure crystal will hurt you as well but as a poster said above its the shitty shit thats made in shitty labs with shitty ingredients that is the ugly side of not just this drug but any alterant.

Again though, the drug is not so much the problem as the circumstances that bring it about, abject poverty and abusive communities are every bit as much to blame as any user.

Finally let me just add that I haven't touch the stuff since about ten years ago when several bikers let me know that this drug and its associations are a killer... That killer had noticed me. I got out got back into life spanked my addictive behavior and now just partake of the green every now and then.

End rant.. thank you and I'm sorry...

on edit:clarity

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Thank you for your story, and you have nothing to be sorry for as
far as I'm concerned. You may owe yourself an apology, but not a general one to everyone. Thankfully you were/are strong enough to change.

Here's to your success!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
24. Those who are making the profit
from the consumption of these drugs and others like them simply look for ways to produce and package it in a manner that sells the most volume and encourages people to buy and use more. "Crack" simply made cocaine easier to retail in poorer neighborhoods than the old white powder.

Meth is, as noted in several posts, rather easy to produce domestically, compared to cocaine. Those who are at the top of the chain include many of the same over-lapping interests. They are merchants of death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
26. what do you mean "addressed" & "resources"?
i see it getting worse, and spreading from the west to other areas of the country. i see the MSM mentioning it, but bush doesn't say shit, the drug czar is all over stopping dope smokers, and meth usage is probably going up as it moves into new population groups, i.e. sub-urban teenagers.

crack was fairly isolated as an urban drug.

of course, if we had the balls to address drugs honesetly, we'd free the weed, and the meth problem would go "poof".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-05 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
27. Meth is cutting into the cocaine market.
And you *know* who profits from the coke market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC