Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone else hear? 2 F18's missing over S. Iraq.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 05:46 PM
Original message
Anyone else hear? 2 F18's missing over S. Iraq.
I guess they fly off of a US aircraft carrier. Anyways, I think it was on CBS News and just coming in. But I was wondering, how would we lose two at the same time. They'd either have to fly into one another or get shot down, right? What would they shoot them down with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. saddam did have anti-aircraft facilities...
...and there's a lot of surface-to-air missles available on the black market worldwide (remember when somebody tried to shoot down an Israeli passenger jet?)

but I don't think those missles, probably shoulder-fired, could bring down something as fast as an F18.
not an expert by any means...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Remember those 200 tons or so of munitions that disappeared
those included some anti-aircraft rockets if I'm not mistaken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MnFats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. oh, yeah, I have wondered about THAT often...
...it seems like NOBODY wanted to get to the bottom of that one.
....the implications for our military and the * administration were too damning, I think. Fuggin' incompetents left tons an tons of high explosvies -- the stuff was described as what you'd MOST want if you were planning a series of car/roadside etc. bombx.


but i also wonder if some of the Baathists, or a few renegade Republican Guards, dismantled some antiaircraft batters and secreted them away out in the desert for a time they felt appropriate...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renegade000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. just saw on CNN.com
funny...i don't see it in LBN yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. I wasn't sure if I'd heard correctly.
Besides, LBN frightens me with all the dire warnings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fabio Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Usually two planes missing means
a collision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe they were actually over Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Shades of Vietnam
'We are not in Cambodia'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. if flying low, which they probably were if on a ground support mission
they are with'n range of todays shoulder fired missiles.

this is the first i've heard though.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. midair collisions

tend to be a statistical fact of life in staggered pair formation flight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. not much to know, yet--here's some of what AP reported
Edited on Mon May-02-05 05:54 PM by librechik
BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) -- The U.S. military said Tuesday it had lost
contact with two jets flying in support of operations in Iraq.
The status of the two U.S. Marine F/A-18 Hornet aircraft and
their crew was not immediately known, the military said in a
statement.
Contact was lost at 10:10 p.m. Monday, the statement said. There
were no initial indications of hostile fire in the area at the
time.
Search efforts were underway, the military said. No further
information was released.

(this is all of it except for AP identifiers)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. Uh-oh!
Separate mechanical failures, or fuel crises seems low probability events.

Two fast movers shot down by shoulder launched missiles or small arms also seems unlikely.

A collision seems more likely. One mistake could maybe take out 2 planes...But we'll have more information soon.

With all the airborne radar, fixed place land radar and naval radar you've got to wonder how anything could really be missing. More likely than not, the military has a good idea of what happened but wants to confirm the status of the personnel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. Here's the LBN Link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. Very likely a midair collision
The odds of two separate missiles striking two separate aircraft without either pilot getting a radio signal out is remote. The odds of two shoulder fired rockets hitting these planes are equally remote...there are few shoulder fired antiaircraft weapons that can be fired in tandem. The only other option would be radar guided missiles, and anyone activating an illicit radar site would be picked up in seconds by our AWACS.

In all odds these two jets were flying in close formation when, for whatever reason, they collided. It could have been mechanical failure on the lead jet, it could have been heavy turbulence, or it could have been pilot error, but the good money says that the two planes struck each other for some reason. It happens about once a year here in the US while training, so it was bound to happen over Iraq sooner or later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Thanks for the info.
I figured that one was tough to hit so two would be extremely difficult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gizmo1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. They wouldn't waste their shoulder
fired missles on a very hard target to hit like an F-18.If they had an abundance of these you would see helicopters and c-130's shot down daily.Must be something else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. they are not hard targets when flying low
and they would be an ideal target if such an opportunity presented itself.

though two disappearing at once i would suspect a collision.

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gizmo1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. They're going like 1000 miles an hour
how is that easy,compared to a chopper doing 150?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ultraist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. "Bloodiest four days in Iraq in two months" and now this...
How sad.


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/02/international/middleeast/02cnd-iraq.html?hp&ex=1115092800&en=cd688afd2894f39d&ei=5094&partner=homepage

More Deadly Bombings as Iraqis Debate Last Cabinet Posts
By SABRINA TAVERNISE
Published: May 2, 2005

BAGHDAD, IRAQ, May 2 - A string of deadly car bombs killed at least 12 people in neighborhoods in and around Baghdad today, the latest attacks in a four-day surge of bloodshed that began with the announcement of Iraq's new cabinet last week. The violence came as Iraq's new Shiite-majority government continued to debate choices for key Sunni cabinet positions late into the night.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC