Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSM stupidity: runaway bride

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
flyingfysh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 02:10 PM
Original message
MSM stupidity: runaway bride
MSNBC actually has the nerve to put up a poll as to whether the guy should still marry her. I would have thought that this was an intensely private decision which should concern nobody else.

This, along with other distractions such as the Michael Jackson case or who was the latest person booted from "Survivor" continue to occupy many minutes of news time. Meanwhile, massive ongoing atrocities in Iraq still go unreported. For example, we still have not seen any photographs of what Falluja looks like now.

MSM: avoiding reporting on the real news whenever possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Some real news...
Bush Administration Allied With Sudan Despite Role in Darfur Genocide






Story on Democracy NOW! today:

In the days after the Sept. 11 attacks, President Bush issued an ultimatum to the world: "Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." Three and half years later, it has been revealed that the Bush administration has allied itself with a government listed as a state sponsor of terrorism and one that the administration has accused of committing genocide against its own people - Sudan.

A major expose in the Los Angeles Times on Friday revealed that the U.S. has quietly forged a close intelligence partnership with Sudan despite the government's role in the mass killings in Darfur. The Sudanese government has since publicly confirmed it is working with the Bush administration and the CIA.

Eight months ago, former Secretary of State Colin Powell accused the Sudanese of carrying out a genocide in Darfur. Already 180,000 have died in the region from fighting or hunger. But relations appear to have since changed -- for the better. One senior Sudanese official the LA Times that the country had achieved "complete normalization" of relations with the CIA.

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/03/1357228


LA Times Story:


Official Pariah Sudan Valuable to America's War on Terrorism

Despite once harboring Bin Laden, Khartoum regime has supplied key intelligence, officials say.

April 29, 2005

By Ken Silverstein, Times Staff Writer


KHARTOUM, Sudan — The Bush administration has forged a close intelligence partnership with the Islamic regime that once welcomed Osama bin Laden here, even though Sudan continues to come under harsh U.S. and international criticism for human rights violations.

The Sudanese government, an unlikely ally in the U.S. fight against terror, remains on the most recent U.S. list of state sponsors of terrorism. At the same time, however, it has been providing access to terrorism suspects and sharing intelligence data with the United States.

Last week, the CIA sent an executive jet here to ferry the chief of Sudan's intelligence agency to Washington for secret meetings sealing Khartoum's sensitive and previously veiled partnership with the administration, U.S. government officials confirmed.

A decade ago Bin Laden and his fledgling Al Qaeda network were based in Khartoum. After they left for Afghanistan, the regime of Sudanese strongman Lt. Gen. Omar Hassan Ahmed Bashir retained ties with other groups the U.S. accuses of terrorism.
<more>

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/la-fg-sudan29apr29,1,2464174.story


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x123141
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. I heard one of the "news" people say something about
the runaway bride thing, and how it was time wasted that could have been used reporting on the M.J. case. It was last night sometime but I'm not sure what show it was. It made me crazy 'cause that comment really showed just how they turn the public's attention away from the issues that would make them think, for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. MSM: Just like Entertainment Tonight only without the nice clothes
Are they oblivious to the fact that we're either laughing at them or ignoring them at this point? I have to go to CNN for entertainment news and Comedy Central for political commentary. :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Faux has the same poll.
I sent Greta van Susteren the following:
Greta,
With respect to your poll question "Should John Mason marry Jennifer Wilbanks?" I was forced to select "other". I hated to do it, but since "It's none of your fucking business" wasn't an option, I had no choice.
Sincerely,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. LOL
:thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-03-05 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Does SHE still want to marry him?
I haven't heard anyone ask that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC