The licenses from Oxyrush's first two failed marraiges

pstokely

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat May-07-05 09:03 PM
Original message

The licenses from Oxyrush's first two failed marraiges

Edited on Sat May-07-05 09:17 PM by pstokely

http://records.co.jackson.mo.us/imgcache/marriage70076-1-2.pdf

http://records.co.jackson.mo.us/imgcache/marriage106094-1-2.pdf

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

MADem

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat May-07-05 09:15 PM
Response to Original message

1. Traded in the old mare for a ten year younger model

The scuzzbag. Gotta love those GOP family values! Hopefully, they both took him to the cleaners...the only unfortunate thing is, he's deaf from drug use, so he can't hear his own screams as he is separated from his fortune if his implant isn't working right!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

pnorman

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat May-07-05 09:17 PM
Response to Original message

2. I loathe that CREEP like most others here do.

But this sort of "investigative reporting" cheapens serious research (IMHO). Unless there's something particularly lurid and/or grossly offensive associated with them, two marriages isn't all that unusual or particularly noteworthy in this country.

pnorman

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

efhmc

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat May-07-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2

3. Don't disagree about the "investigative reporting" but this guy is

always touting family values. Honoring ones marriage vows seems a good place to start.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

pnorman

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat May-07-05 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #3

5. I think there are far less "trivial" places to start from.

For starters, there's the "doctor-shipping" bit. The irony of ACLU defending the "privacy" of his medical records is also worth commenting on. And there are so many of his OUTRIGHT LIES!

Properly researched and presented, I'm sure that there'd be much to get the Theo-Cons ready to burn him at the stake, but I don't think two marriges would do it. In 1952, I cast my first vote for Adlai Stevenson. A very effective push-poll quetion then, was "Do you want to see a DIVORCED man in the White House?" But none of the same sort seem to have a problem with the fact that the FIRST divorced man ever in the White House was Ronnie Reagan.

pnorman

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

walldude

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat May-07-05 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #2

4. It's not the amount of marriages

it's the hypocrisy of the thing...

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

gollygee

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat May-07-05 10:46 PM
Response to Original message

6. AAaaah the sanctity of marriage

how lovely

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Tue May 07th 2024, 03:10 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.