Please help! RE: Vote fraud.

Hi all,

Like many of you, I am thoroughly convinced that these past two Presidential elections, perhaps even some interim elections were stolen. Being somewhat pessimistic, I have spent these past 6 months under the impression that we are up against an unstoppable cabal and there's almost nothing that can be done about it. My father, a brilliant PhD, MPH Epidemiologist is a good deal more optimistic than I am and has been working with the Ohio Project and Voters Unite in order to use the information available to him to prove that the anomalies which occured during the most recent election could not have occured by chance.

Most recently, he has done a thorough report on reports of vote switching by machine type, state, and county and which candidate benefitted. As you might imagine, his analysis once again points to fraud on behalf of said unstoppable cabal. My dad would like to post this analysis on the DU, however, because it has tables and appendices, neither of us are certain how to post it with the proper HTML formatting. I am somewhat familiar with HTML, but I don't know how I would post this without a great amount of modification.

So my question is, does anybody know how this analysis can be posted while keeping the tables and appendices intact. Or, does someone know where I could post the full Word document so that it could be linked from the body of the post? Any information you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thanks as always.

I'd be happy to upload the word doc if you want to PM me.

PM has been sent :)

When should we expect it?

Sorry I can't give you any advice on how to post it, but it looks as though you're getting the help you need.

Pauldp was kind enough to offer space to post the Word document, so I should have it posted sans tables with a link to them shortly.

And if anyone would like to see the Word file prior to my dad or me posting it on the DU, just PM me with your email and I'll send you a copy. Just let me know.

http://uscountvotes.org/

they have an email listserv also: uscv_stats@uscountvotes.org

He's actually working with quite a few voter fraud organizations.

I discussed it with my father as soon as I saw it and apparently it's not entirely accurate. The biggest fallacy was that all 10 swing states resided outside of the margin of error. In actuality, there were 11 swing states, all which ended up going for Bush. However, it was 5 of the 11 states which were outside of the margin of error. The odds of this happening are astronomically low and certainly statistically impossible, but it was an error none-the-less. It's great that this info is getting out regardless.