Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nightline: Janice Karpinski says Rumsfeld knew about Abu Ghraib - (VIDEO)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 11:53 PM
Original message
Nightline: Janice Karpinski says Rumsfeld knew about Abu Ghraib - (VIDEO)
May 12, 2005

Video - Nightline: Janice Karpinski says Rumsfeld knew about Abu Ghraib



Video in Real Media format (5 minutes)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. OH..Man....I just turned it on (Mountain Time)....she just said it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. She only did what she was told by her superior!!!
Janis has seen being a good soldier gets you demoted and just wait soon to be charged!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Of course he did!
As well as the WH counsel, etc.
Will try to stay up to watch, it's on at 11:30 pm here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow.. thanks for sharing this..
It's incredible to me that Rumsfeld and Sanchez aren't even discussed anymore..

Too many Americans have such a short attention span.. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-12-05 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Why was I the only General Officer "..."I will not be silenced"!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wow..She's taking them on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evlbstrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Don't get on any small planes, Janice!
Bless you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. A sincere thank you, Dzika ... that's the gold standard for MUST SEE TV
The entire show is incredible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. She said Rumsfeld either knew or should have known.
She referred to those prisoners in Abu-Ghraib as "so-called terrorists." Oh, man, they're going to come down hard on her.

Her voice is a wee bit shaky, but she's holding her own.

Not convinced that the torture has stopped!

Quote: "We can do better than this as an army and a country."

She did very well. Very well indeed. Thanks, dzika, I don't have television, and it's great to see an interview like this.

:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. anytime...
glad to shine the light of truth on Rumsfeld
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
42. "We can do better than this as an army and a country."
I wonder who she voted for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
11. Of course he did
The neo-cons thought they could torture the location of the fictional WMD's out of these poor Iraqis they rounded up at random.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
12. Is there a transcript yet?
Can't play the video at work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dzika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #12
25. Quick transcript...
Here is a quick transcript of what is on the video clip. There was more to the entire interview.


TK: You've had months now to lie awake a night thinking about this. Why do you think the buck stops with you?

JK: Because I think it's convenient. All the way up to the top of the Pentagon, they have a different... a long standing mindset about Reservist and National Guard soldiers. And we are considered disposable. We go back to our lives as civilians once we're released from active duty. And I think it goes a long way to explaining why we were not well received by General Sanchez or his entire staff. They didn't want to acknowledge that they need a reserve brigade, especially one commanded by a female general officer to do this critical mission.


TK: Are you saying... you're clearly saying that General Sanchez knew or should have known what was going on at Abu Ghraib. Are you saying that anybody above his level knew or should have known?

JK: Well, who ever told, ordered Miller, General Miller, Major General Miller to come and "assist" knew what his successes apparently or his abilities. There was conversation... I was, I am only talking about direct conversations with people in the Military Intelligence Command. Specifically the commander and General fast who believe that he was coming with the instructions from undersecretrary Kim Bone(sp?) and the Secretary of Defense, Rumsfeld.


TK: You're saying the Secretary of Defense knew or should have known?

JK: Well, absolutely. And I would say that it is consistent with his direction for the military.


TK: Which was?

JK: Which was... we have to get on the ground level with these so-called terrorist or people that are know associates of them and we have to operate the same was they do.


TK: When firing you, the dereliction of duty was a specific charge? Did you have a chance to face your accusers?

JK: Did not and they have not released any specifics about that charge.


TK: Is this thing over?

JK: I don't believe it's over.


TK: When I say "is this thing over"... Will you sue? Can you sue?

JK: Well, I think there is definitely grounds for discrimination. Why was I the only General officer singled out to be suspended from command when the information shows that other people had knowledge and were clearly involved.


TK: What has your lawyer told you? Is there anything actionable here?

JK: They believe that there are some things that are actionable and we will pursue them. Janice Karpinski will not be silenced. You can do anything you want to do. Whatever you have in your bag to take action against me that you feel is necessary go ahead and do it. Because you are going to anyway with or without my permission. But they can't change history. I was a brigadier general. I was in command of 17 prison facilities and Abu Ghraib. I did have 3400 plus soldiers working for me. I was proud to serve with each and every one of them.


TK: We're at war. It's a difficult was. It's clearly going to be a long war. This has been a terrible incident. Terrible for you personally. Terrible for the nation. Terrible for our reputation in the world. But on one level you kind of want to say: "Let it be. Let's get on with our lives. Let's get on with the war." What do you say to those that might suggest that is the right way to go about things from here on?

JK: I would say that if you let it go, you might lose sight of the fact that some of this might still be going on. The pictures, I said, for several months after I first became aware of the pictures, I said, well at least the photographs will stop this. I'm not convinced. Maybe people that are orchestrating this have gotten smarter and have gotten better and have certainly threatened any soldier coming near any interrogation with a camera probably with any kind of military discipline they can give them. We can do better than this as an Army and a country. And I can tell you from the Military Intelligence interrogators they wanted to release, easily, 80% of the prisoners that were held at Abu Ghraib because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time but they weren't allowed to. And at one point when I was protesting that, I was told "I don't care if we are holding 15,000 innocent Iraqis, we are winning the war." And my response was "not inside the wire we're not because every person we're holding who is innocent become our enemy the minute they walk out of any prison."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimpossible Donating Member (785 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
36. What's with the squirrel?
That's a hilarious picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. nominated
thanks, She is not falling in her sword. Good for her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
14. Wow! Good for her - kick some Pentagon butt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
15. Remember Rummy wanted to quit twice...
but * wouldn't let him. Some one needs to take the fall...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
16. "We can do better than this as an Army and as a country"
"I can tell you that from the military intelligence interrogators, they wanted to release, easily 80% of the prisoners that we being held at Abu Gharib, because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time, but they weren't allowed to.

And at one point when I was protesting that, I was told, "I don't care if we're holding 15,000 innocent Iraqis, we're winning the war." and my response was, not inside the wire you're not. Because every person that we're holding who is innocent, becomes our enemy the minute they walk out of any prison."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. thanks for the elaboration
i can't play the video at work, but it sounds like a great clip. I'm looking forward to seeing it when I get home ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindoctor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
18. Wasn't that already established?
I remember a Rumsfeld document surfacing within a week of the England pictures.

Still a good thing. For a lot of people it never happened if it wasn't on TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumpy old fart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
19. Just hope she follows through on the "legal action" she mentions....
Surely Amnesty International and such would have interest in funding this....God knows Congress won't pursue anything....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
20. you go girl
stay safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
21. Neatly burried is who ordered the misleading demotion.
Bush signed it, did'nt he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
22. On a clip on another news show
Edited on Fri May-13-05 10:24 AM by Horse with no Name
She stated "Where do you think these enlisted men and women got dogchains and collars in the middle of a prison in Iraq?"

Wonderfulllllllllll question.
I don't remember those being on an approved list when I sent items over there, and could you imagine these folks writing mom and asking her to send them?
This is sooooooo deep. I hope she isn't killed before she can break this wide open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
23. She is only confirming what we all already know
The Buck stops at the top....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
24. Wow! She publicly stated that the guards wanted to let out 80%
of the prisoners because they felt they were innocent and it was forbidden. This is heavy stuff. She is brave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
26. Wow. Nominated.
Thank you once again for an important video, dzika!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
27. My very first impression of Janis Karpinski was that she reminded
me of nurse Ratchet (sp?)in "One Flew Over...", and just by looking at her, I thought she was capable of ordering those under her to do what they did. Since that first impression I have come to truly admire this woman and stand behind her 100%. To Republicans she's just another stupid woman who is easily discarded and made the scapegoat. Well, I think they picked on the wrong woman and misjudged her entirely. You go, Girl - kick their asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
28. Thank you for recording and posting. Nominated. (nt)
Edited on Fri May-13-05 11:49 AM by understandinglife
www.missionnotaccomplished.us - Be it MNA Day 3 or 8 or 15 or .... the day will come when 10s of millions of Americans and others stop their typical activities for 24 hours and urge 10 times that many to join should another MNA Day be required. On that glorious day America will have begun truly to be "America," again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
29. A kick for Janis - everybody should read this thread and stand
behind this woman all the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
30. She needs to follow through with legal action...
She's the only high ranking officer charged with any wrong doing in all this. What happend to the Intel officers from Ft. Hucahuca that were in Iraq when this was occuring? Oh yea, they were sent back to Huachuca early, and promoted. Active duty treated one way, Reserves are scape goats. As an Army Nat'l Guard soldier that was in Iraq, this really pisses me off!
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Justice in Amerika?

Rumsfailed Admitted to Violating Geneva Convention

Rumsfailed admitted in public on TV that when CIA Director Tenet requested that an Iraqi prisoner be sent to a secret Afghan/US Prison that Rumsfailed did so. After four months a DOD Attorney stated that this was an illegal act. Rumsfailed then ordered that this prisoner be sent back to Abu Graihib but the prisoner was purposefully not listed at that location, also an illegal act. Rumsfeld also admitted to signing orders for tougher interogation methods which violated the Geneva Conventions.

Rumfailed has commited at least three violations of the Geneva Convention thereby also violations of The Constitution of the USA. Recently it has been found out that even more detainees were "ghost detainees". The fact that Rumsfailed and Tenet have not been charged speaks volumes. If Congress wishes to garner any respect they should move forward with Rep. Rangle's Impeachment Declaration of Rumsfailed and also proscecute Ex. CIA Tenet.


Does the US, Govt., Congress, and the Justice Dept no longer abide by the Geneva Convention or the Constitution of the USA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
31. Thank you for the video, dzika. It was much appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
32. Well duh
We all know they are as guilty as sin all the way up to the top. And nothing happens to them. The top people are some of the scumiest ideolgoues on earth. Because their entire m.o. is the end justifies the means. How can we not root for the end to fail when they are so without morality?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
34. Good for Karpinski!
She finally has come to realize it's a crock of doodoo to "take one for the team." Of course Rummy knew and it flows downhill from there. Maybe it's higher than Rummy . . . wouldn't be a surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Helga Scow Stern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
35. Wow. Way to go Janice! Tell the truth! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
37. I hope her legal action succeeds in making cracks in the stone wall
We all know she was scapegoated and this went to the top. Now is the job of proving it. Of course they will refuse to supply documents and this will take time. But I'm glad she's fighting and this is getting some press. Suprising that she was allowed to speak on TV at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
38. Excellent clip...thanks for posting. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
39. Um, duh!
Not directed at you, directed at the Sheeple. I know most everyone here at DU is well aware that Rumhead knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
40. Wow, someone needs her to testify before Congress!
So that "Whitewash" can be applied to history one more time!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-05 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
41. ...and a CARTOON for the occasion:
(found at yesterday's issue of AllHatNoCattle.net)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
43. Thanks so much for posting.
I don't watch a lot of Nightline, I never would have been able to see this woman. Did I hear her right? Did she just basically say to BushCo "Bring it on"? She's got spunk. I like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC