Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When will the US-Iran war commence?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 11:49 PM
Original message
Poll question: When will the US-Iran war commence?
I have my thoughts as to how it will all play out, but I'd like to hear from DU first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. June
Because I believe everything I read at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-14-05 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bush has already killed off our kids & limited the supply
Unless Bush manufactures a hit on American soil, there is no way he can find the troop power to stage another war. The republicans aren't going to come forward to serve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yellow_Dog Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He will make a two part announcement
#1 - I am happy to announce that our troops are at this moment crossing in to Iran.

#2 - The first draft notices are going out in the mail as I speak.

Let me assure you ladies and gentlemen that both of these decisions were necessary to keep our way of life safe from the bad people, and that this should be a short war, and the draft will end with the fall of North Korea (oops, that was part of my next speech)

I will be monitoring our progress closely from my ranch in Texas, as God told me I will be happier there during this time of stress, after all this is hard work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. And I've asked Rove & Cheney to interrupt my bicycling
if these events happen. I don't know if they will listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Never, I hope
Edited on Sun May-15-05 12:30 AM by kansasblue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valerie5555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. hopefully never as well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't see how they would get away with it. We don't have enough...
troops...yada, yada, yada. Same ol' song and dance, including, "Yes, but they ARE that stupid."

I guess we'll all find out, won't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Iran
The problem, though is that Iraq (which is majority Shi'ite) is particularly vulnerable to attack from Iran. Ironically, Saddam Hussein was useful as a counter to Shi'ite power in this region. That balance has now shifted; one of Iraq's 3 new governing ministers is Chalabi, a Shi'ite who has spent much time in Iran and (after earlier being tersely rebuked by the * administration) is not likely to be pro-US. A likely scenario is that a vastly larger share of the world's petroleum reserves will be controlled by unfriendly Iran.

The administration will be tempted to engage in conflict with Iran, because not to do so will prove once and for all that *'s war for oil is a complete and utter disaster. Furthermore, there is a very large Iranian community in the US who (having left after the Mullahs took control) are anxious to see the return of a secular Iranian Government. Teheran's million person street revolt last year was apparently lead by a disc jockey in LA. I see the possibility of a Bay of Pigs-style fiasco combined with Nixonian expansion, a la early 70's Indochina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valerie5555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. How about a disaster that made Carter's Operation Eagle's Claw
look like a near military triumph by comparison??????????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Carter
I think Carter's effort could possibly have worked; at least the goal was so well-defined and noble that failure was preferable to doing nothing. If I'm not mistaken, Carter did negotiate the hostages' return in time for Reagan's first day in office. In the current situation, however we have entire countries (Brazil, China, Russia and India) aligning against us in anticipation of our entrance into Iran. This is scary stuff. I certainly hope that * has the restraint and guidance to be able to avoid conflict in Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valerie5555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Too bad Carter's effort didn't succeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. No, that rebuke was 'cosmetic distancing'...
We will have an indefinite military presence in Iraq, and I'd wager a stronger presence than Saddam's Iraq represented.

Either way - I must agree that we need to invade Iran. And I believe we need an 'event' to secure national support for a draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Valerie5555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Probably somewhere like BETHESDA MD for it is a BEDROOM COMMUNITY of
Washington DC :scared: :tinfoilhat: :scared: :tinfoilhat:.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Nah, too valuable...
I was thinking more like Buffalo, NY. due to it's border status, blue state residence, demographic makeup, relative economic insignificance, and vast lack of success by their sports teams.

Kind of a microcosm for the Democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhite5 Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. We NEED to invade?? You can't be serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Well, perhaps not 'invade' per se... but we MUST
get control in the area.

We're playing a two-pronged game with bin Laden and Al-qaeda right now.

We are goading each-other quite on purpose so that both we and they need to become entrenched.

Either way, we must stay there to play pricing games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. No money, no troops, no trust
No way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theduckno2 Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. I hope never, but voted for second half of 2005.
I still believe that that an attack would come before the Iranian reactor is operational. I understand that fuel loading would take place later this year and I doubt they would be willing to attack an operational reactor. If anyone has current info on the timeline for reactor operation, I am all ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindoctor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. The US-Iran war is going on 20 years
Even this Administration is not arrogant enough to think they can hold Iran (under the current circumstances) if they escalate the cold war status quo.

Iranians hate us not just for our freedom but have some real bones to pick with young mr. Roosevelt and the rest of the US. You think Iraq is bad? You ain't seen nothing yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Iran
Iran is an odd case. The mullahs' continued support comes mostly from rural Iranians, who are conservative and super-religious. My Iranian friends tell me that Teheran is very western (and has a rising middle class), and its more cosmopolitan citizens hate the theocrats. I'm just afraid that wealthy Iranian ex-pats here in the US will gain the chimp's allegiance. One cannot dispute that the overall feeling in Iran is anti-US, and they will fight tooth and nail against us.
I hope that * is mindful of the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) alliance which has been formed to counter US expansion. Brazil, though developing is hugely influential in South America, and has the ear of Venezuela, with its oil production. Russia's Putin has recently been flexing his muscles, and recently had to endure a boring and obnoxious visit by the Chimp. I think they still have a few nukes, too. India, curiously just announced its intention to buy a huge number of Boeing aircraft, which will no doubt be rescinded if we attack Iran. Furthermore, they just announced that they will build an oil pipeline from Iran to India, via Pakistan. China, for its part holds a lot of US debt, and can materially affect our ability to wage war if it so decides. I hope * will look at the Iranian situation in terms of global realities (realpolitik), but I have my doubts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
17. And the nation will only stand for it if its in self-defense
Edited on Sun May-15-05 01:23 AM by Skip Intro
so I also expect another 9*11-ish pretext.

(I expected that just before the "elections" too, but if you got the machines, why play your other ace?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lala_rawraw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
20. We already know...
Ritter said June/July... so watch for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
21. So how is Bush going to get recruits willing to fight Iran?
He can't keep up with meeting the demands in Iraq and Afghanistan now.
For all of you saying, we'll attack there, come up with how he'll get the recruits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. The military can scrape enough troops to get started from whats left of
National Guard units, reserves, and IRR.

Then they can gut the military forces from Germany, Korea, Japan and other military bases, even take none combat troops and put them though a quick combat training course.

The problem comes when we need replacements for the killed and injured, where do they come from?

The draft, that's when the fun starts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
22. June ... but there are rumblings along the Syrian border.
Either its a measure too keep people from coming in to Iraq or it's a prelude to a Syrian invasion... or somebody's been eating imported Polish sausages.

There's a lot more oil in the other direction, though. Maybe they'll nuke Iran with some RNEPs (except the oil fields) and beat the shit outta Syria... I don't know. What I do know is, the lizards want that oil no matter what. They may not wait to roll out the new war product in September. They know Americans are catching on to their bull shit and need to create a major distraction... if I were 18, I'd join up with the Mennonites, Buddhists, et al, real quick and claim CO status. :scared:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC