|
Edited on Thu May-19-05 11:32 PM by FreedomAngel82
I just heard this on Malloy's show and was wondering if anybody knew about this. Apparently, according to this caller, when we do trial Saddam it will be in the international courts and we won't be able to use our court system's like they did with the guy on the Pentagon papers (Ramsey Clarke who was apart of the Johnson administration). Malloy question's whether or not he still has the energy to mount the defense against the sob's. For Clarke to defend him against the charges brought against him it will cause Clarke (or is it Clark?) to draw on a strength if he still has it. Malloy says he doesn't think Saddam will never be tried by an Iraqi court and if he is tried it will either be a) a US military court or b) brought back to this country and tried. Too much will come out from deposition's and documentation's taken and discovery that Ramsey Clarke will use to defend him. Malloy is saying even if the person is guilty they still deserve a strong defense (and we all know in the case of WMD's, which is why he was taken out, he was innocent). According to Malloy in the US military court the rules are different. My opinion is he will never be tried. Why? They haven't yet obviously and he's still locked up. We and they know he didn't have any weapons of mass destruction and it was all lies. I'm wondering if we never get to trial Hussein during a Bush administration is it possible, if we win in 2008, to trial him and still prision Bush for false accusation's, all his war crimes etc?
|