|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Mika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 09:14 PM Original message |
Question: What are "extraordinary circumstances" (Re filibuster) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yankeedem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. When the Democrats take the Senate, and Pukes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 09:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Um.. when will that be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gothmog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
2. Up to discretion of each senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
makhno (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. Why are they unacceptable? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TaleWgnDg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
3. No. Re-phrase the question. Because "extraordinary circumstances" . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 09:21 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Yep. Status Quo Ante Bellum. But the Republicans look like they lost |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 09:37 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. How is it Status Quo Ante Bellum if they get Owens and Rogers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 09:39 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. What scenario did you envision where we wouldn't get Owens and Rogers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:04 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. In this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. I don't understand--Why would they have given up one of the three? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 11:06 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Becuase a real deal would mean they didn't have the votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 11:16 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. That's kind of how I see it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 09:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. Read The Document. It's Up To Each Senator To Decide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
5. Whatever we say they are when we need to. That's why the Repubs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goldeneye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
7. I found this on the Kerry forum, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Just Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 09:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. SPOT ON TOON!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DawnneOBTS (374 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
8. I don't know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 09:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I don't think we've heard the last either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nuxvomica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
14. The three exempt nominees are the definition of EC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
15. "extraordinary circumstances" means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smartvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
17. It was left at Senators' discretion. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fleshdancer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
19. The Democratic Leaders need to quickly define it for themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Goldmund (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
21. The $64,000 question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
22. The Rapture, obviously. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 06:40 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC