|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:31 PM Original message |
REALIZE - they can bring back the Nuclear option at ANY TIME |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:33 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. I know, I know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:37 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Dobson is bitching |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbonds (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:36 PM Response to Original message |
3. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. In other words, Repugs still have the nuke option |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BattyDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:43 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. "Extreme is defined by an agreement of 40 people it is extreme." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:44 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. If I was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
11. there is NO provision whatsoever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Internut (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-24-05 12:35 AM Response to Reply #3 |
18. I don't think so - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zen Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:37 PM Response to Original message |
5. Well they agreed to NO rules changes in this Congress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:49 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. yes but, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ultraist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
7. yep, see DeWine's comments on this thread: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreedomAngel82 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-23-05 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
9. You nailed it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbonds (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-24-05 12:07 AM Response to Reply #9 |
13. So basically you are saying you can't trust the deal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spindoctor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-24-05 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
14. No they can't. That is why seven Republicans signed the treaty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-24-05 12:16 AM Response to Original message |
15. You do realize that we can shut down congress when they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-24-05 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
16. but at least now more people know what they're up to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-24-05 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
17. NO NO NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-24-05 05:46 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. they don't need me to fucking tell them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
murielkane (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-24-05 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
19. The struggle is really about having the moral high ground |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 04:54 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC