Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Great Moments In Bi-Partisan Compromise During The Bush Years!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 08:45 PM
Original message
Great Moments In Bi-Partisan Compromise During The Bush Years!!!
Edited on Tue May-24-05 08:46 PM by DistressedAmerican
Well we have seen bipartisan compromise win the day over either the extreme left or extreme right positions.

That made me do some thinking about some of the other shining moments in Bi-partisan cooperation that we have seen since the Chimp and his daddies cronies came to power.

While this is not a comprehensive list, it is illustrative of what we get when we trust these asswipes.
=====================================================================

In the years since 9/11, a couple of big deals stand out.

First we have:


THE IRAQ WAR RESOLUTION

107th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. J. RES. 114
October 10, 2002


JOINT RESOLUTION
To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.
Whereas in 1990 in response to Iraq's war of aggression against and illegal occupation of Kuwait, the United States forged a coalition of nations to liberate Kuwait and its people in order to defend the national security of the United States and enforce United Nations Security Council resolutions relating to Iraq;

Whereas after the liberation of Kuwait in 1991, Iraq entered into a United Nations sponsored cease-fire agreement pursuant to which Iraq unequivocally agreed, among other things, to eliminate its nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons programs and the means to deliver and develop them, and to end its support for international terrorism;

Whereas the efforts of international weapons inspectors, United States intelligence agencies, and Iraqi defectors led to the discovery that Iraq had large stockpiles of chemical weapons and a large scale biological weapons program, and that Iraq had an advanced nuclear weapons development program that was much closer to producing a nuclear weapon than intelligence reporting had previously indicated;

-more here: http://www.yourcongress.com/ViewArticle.asp?article_id=2686



That compromise was lauded at the time as a great compromise. It was seen as the beginning of a solution to the Iraq "problem". As we have seen it set the stage for our unauthorized entry into Iraq. An invasion that many believe was illegal as well as catastrophic to the country of Iraq!

Way to work together guys. Thank God the democrats believed the information they were given by Republicans before that vote! I'm sure the well over 100,000 dead Iraqi civilians and Halliburton thank us equally for our willingness to work together!
================================================================

Lets look at another fine example of what our working WITH repugs gets us:

The USA PATRIOT ACT

The USA PATRIOT Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001)1 (U.S. H.R. 3162, S. 1510, Public Law 107-56) is an act of federal legislation in the United States. Enacted by an overwhelming majority of the U.S. Congress after the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks, it was primarily intended to enhance the authority of U.S. law enforcement to preempt and investigate potential terrorism. Expanding on FISA, the USA Act defines terrorism as activity that appears to be intended to (1) intimidate or coerce the government or civil population AND (2) breaks criminal laws AND (3) endangers human life. This definition is adopted in the USA PATRIOT Act. Critics claim the Act is unnecessary and enables U.S. law enforcement to infringe upon free-speech, freedom of the press, human rights, and right to privacy.

The bill passed 98–1 in the United States Senate, and 357–66 in the United States House of Representatives; Senator Russ Feingold (Democrat, Wisconsin) cast the Senate's lone dissenting vote. President George W. Bush signed the bill into law on October 26, 2001. Assistant attorney general Viet D. Dinh was the chief architect of the act. As of November 16, 2004, the USA PATRIOT Act has been used to charge 372 suspected terrorists and convict 194 of them.

-More here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_Act



This one was going to KEEP US ALL SAFE!

Well, I'll leave it to you to decide how badly that fucked the country. Time will tell. Sure does not look like a good compromise, bi-partisan at this point.
====================================================================

The moral to all of this? Talk to me in a year about whether this is a good compromise for US OR whether we just got screwed AGAIN!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Please lay out exactly what your better alternative was.
What? Have Frist invoke the nuclear option? You have no guarantee whatsoever that we had enough votes to block it and I have no faith whatsoever in either RINOs or DINOs to stand strong against party pressure. Never forget the Medicaid bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I Told You To Ask Me In A Year. I'm Not ready To Say Yeah Or Neah
Edited on Tue May-24-05 09:04 PM by DistressedAmerican
right now. I don't feel good about it however.

There is little or no guarantee they will even hold to this relatively marginal deal.

They say this deal was built on trust. I simply ask what trust?

I think that is a fair question to ask without folks trying to make me prove vote counts one freaking way or the other.

Although since you ask, the deal WAS STRUCK BECAUSE THEY DIDN"T HAVE THE FREAKING VOTES!

I'm glad that Frist looks like an ass. Just not as sure as some that it is anything other than a blip. Another occasion where we capitulated under their pressure rather than stand up to it.

We may have just given the bullies our lunch money once AGAIN!!!

Now let me ask you this, Do know of any examples where working WITH them has worked out good for us since this national hysteria began?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Oh please, you laid out your assessment through your opening diatribe.
Why else did you highlight the Iraq War and the Patriot Act? For what other purpose was that? For that matter, what's a line like "We may have just given the bullies our lunch money once AGAIN!!!" when you allegedly haven't made a decision yet? Bullshit. You've made your decision - you just don't have any better options or don't want to state them.

The deal was struck because 14 moderates took it upon themselves WITHOUT approval from either leader. Have you forgotten what happens to RINOs when they're whipped by party leadership? They change their votes, and quickly. I'm not saying they did have the votes, but not a single person on this planet can say for certain that they wouldn't have had those votes when push came to shove. NO ONE.

And being that we're both on the edges of the political spectrum here, no compromise is going to please either of us. I'm not thrilled with the decision. I also don't think it's a horrible thing either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That Simply Is Not True! I See The Possible Good In This Deal.
Edited on Tue May-24-05 09:20 PM by DistressedAmerican
Clearly Whether it was or was not a victory for us, It sure was a defeat for the repugs. They showed their asses AGAIN but, this time the country saw them and gasped. I think that is great.

Clearly the Right is miserable about it. That is great. As others have noted the perception of being winners is great. Good for morale and a hopeful sign.

Does that make you feel better?

My point, IS (whether you choose to believe it or not) that I really am not sure how it will work out in the long run. The devil is in the details. Where are our real guantees?

It looks good now. It is possible it will look worse in retrospect.

Fair?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. You won't have to wait a year
Frist is going to invoke cloture on Myers later this week. It is a direct challenge to the 14 Senators who signed the agreement and a hearty fuck you to everyone else so this is going to play out a lot sooner.

The bright spot in this is that now that the agreement has seen the light of day, the republicans who signed it will be hard pressed to go back on it. They might not have felt so conflicted if this came up in a year or two when their constituencies probably wouldn't remember anything about it but it's coming up in the same week! He didn't even wait a week!

Monumentally stupid move on Frist's part. Until I saw this one I firmly believed that Frist was involved in the compromise as a way to save face (for not having the necessary votes for the nuclear option). Now, I'm not sure at all that he was because this is definitely a "cutting off his nose despite his face" moment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Actually, it isn't a stupid move by PissyFrist, it is a DESPERATE one
Pissy was supposed to be "the anointed one." The DeLay of the Senate, the guy carrying the Rove sewage from the WH to the Senate chamber for consumption by the loyal acolytes. His reward was to be the next anointed one. He was riding high, the insider, the guy with all the cards, the overseer who stood to inherit the whole plantation, if he would only have patience and do a good job whipping the slaves into shape during the interim.

A pissed off old sonofbitch named McCain, with his longtime backer, Warner, have decided to challenge that assumption, and the Gang of 14 is part and parcel of that challenge.

Pissy sees his power draining away, rapidly, frighteningly so he must act now, or never. Will he succeed? Will others be emboldened, and shift their allegiance to the Gang? Will he find a way to bully or con his GOP slaves, with threats of withdrawal of GOP funding? Will the Gang set up their own infrastructure of PACs to overcome that? Will Pissy find a way to keep the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard open, in order to peel Snowe and Collins away from the pact? Will Warner find two others to take their places if that occurs? Such a soap opera!

This has as much to do with a GOP challenge from the center, a throwdown to the right, as it has to do with preserving Senate rules and ensuring minority voices.

We are certainly benefitting from it, and that is good for us, until we can take back the legislative branch. And when we do, we will have to be kind to the GOP 7, because that is only the fair thing to do.

You know the old saw: The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. If He Does Implode, It Is His Own Doing! What A Loser!
Let's Keep Our Fingers Crossed!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nominated nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Exactly! Tell it like it is DA!!!
Nominated!!!

:kick:

The lizards are in orbit above Earth! ... They're here for the oil!... :scared:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Let's never forget "No Child Left Behind"
The personal bankruptcy bill, too. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Uh... that bill was slightly altered...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The eyes in that are the best!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yep, cooperation and compromise have been working just swimmingly
for us so far.

I'm cautiously pessimistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-24-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'll give this another recommendation.
other bi-partisan triumphs of compromise:

The First (Economic Stimulus) Tax cut for the Rich

The Compromise on Star Wars funding

Tort Reform passed with bi-partisan support

These are not 1st degree legislative compromises, but deserve mentioning:

The 911 investigation

The hearings on Abu-Gharib
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Wouldn't Want To Over Look Those. MSM Loved Them All Too!
Doing The People's Work! Getting Back To Business!

Bullshit!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. You missed the 'best' compromise...
...when 'moderate' Democrats agreed to leave the Bush WH out of the 9-11 investigations and not make an issue of the fact that he and his family have a business relationship with the Saudi Royals...the country of origin of most of the hijackers.

And I have to say that I don't believe the information about conviction rate of 'terrorists' under the Patriot act. Many of the 'convictions' were overturned for lack of evidence, etc.

It's also a matter of opinion as to whether these were 'compromises' or collusion and complicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. True! That Was A Fine One! Still Have Yet To Think Of A Compromise
that has actually worked for US!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
17. "Compromise", for politicians, means the people lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Hey They Are Just Doing The People's Work! I'm Sure We Are Top
most on their list of concerns!!!

Well, After gourging at the big trough, cutting the throats of their enemies, ensuring additional years of trough feeding, and maybe having a quickie with Jeff Gannon...

MY GOD! So Cynical!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Can Anyone Point Out A Single Compromise The We Have Made With Bush Repugs
that has come out good for us in the end?

Just one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Is There Such An Animal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. the silence is deafening.
I think the euphoria is wearing off and reality is settling in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Hmmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I SAID. "I THINK THE SILENCE IS DEAFENING"
Everyone claiming victory seems to be a little tight lipped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. There ya go again.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
27. don't forget No Child Left Behind bill
and the Prescription drug plan and the first round of tax cuts. We get screwed every time we cooperate with those lying sacks of sh!t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. There Are Tone Of Examples Od Getting Screwed. None Have Surfaced
where it worked out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DistressedAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-05 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
29. Eveving kicker!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC