And it's lsargely the media's fault. I am also interested in making the true cost of war more evident to normal Americans. please tell me what you think of my idea.
Crossposted at:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1818634I really feel that the reason the anti-war movement hasn't seen more popular support in the US is because of this sanitized version of war that most people are getting. The reason Abu Ghraib, Terri Schiavo and other recent media shitstorms have been so big is because of the power that images have on people. A picture is priceless because it gets past excuses and busllshit and into the heart of the matter, that these are human beings whose future has forever ended or changed because of Bush's war.
What is the solution? Well, I remember a few years back, an anti-abortion group came to our school. They had printed out giant billboards showing pictures of aborted fetuses, holocaust victims and other powerful imagery. They were camped out on campus square talking, often yelling, with people about how abortion is wrong, and has no place in civilized society. It got a real reaction out of almost everybody. I stayed there talking and listening for about an hour, and that exchange significantly changed how I have viewed the issue since.
I propose the same thing, except using images of the American dead and the innocent Iraqi children killed or maimed by the war. We can make large scale prints relatively cheaply at Kinko's. I also know an art-print place that will print and mount large scale images for half-price for me. We can take along literature such as the Downing street memo, the recent UK report revealing that we doubled our bombing immediately before the war started, excerpts from Paul O'Neill's book, and other documents which make the case for this being an illegal war. The key is to bring home the human cost of this war, and the photographs can do this like nothing else.