Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

While * whines about cutting foreign oil programs, check this out:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 09:50 AM
Original message
While * whines about cutting foreign oil programs, check this out:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/05/31/supremecourt/main698684.shtml

(AP) The Supreme Court on Tuesday overturned the conviction of the Arthur Andersen accounting firm for destroying Enron Corp.-related documents before the energy giant's collapse.

In a unanimous opinion, justices said the former Big Five accounting firm's June 2002 conviction was improper. It said the jury instructions at trial were too vague and broad for jurors to determine correctly whether Andersen obstructed justice.

"The jury instructions here were flawed in important respects," Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote for the court.

The ruling is a setback for the Bush administration, which made prosecution of white-collar criminals a high priority following accounting scandals at major corporations. After Enron's 2001 collapse, the Justice Department went after Andersen first.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Have I misunderstood something here?
The ruling is a setback for the Bush administration, which made prosecution of white-collar criminals a high priority following accounting scandals at major corporations. After Enron's 2001 collapse, the Justice Department went after Andersen first.


:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The assumption in that statement is
that the B*sh administration WANTS to prosecute white collar crime...

pretty funny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. So does this mean that Arthur Anderson
Edited on Tue May-31-05 10:22 AM by NV Whino
can reclaim the name Arthur Anderson, undeclare bankruptcy and continue shredding?

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. You forgot that every day is "opposite Day" in the B White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. No, but the 'media agnecy' had. Possinly deliberately.
Actions speak louder than words. *co's actions make the media's assertion that *co wants to fix anything a joke, but people will buy it all the same.

We get what we deserve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's an old boy network
A bully club if you ain't in it and part of the gang..you are to be used up abused,swindled,and exploited..and the laws are not written for people like you.These bastards want to rule and be rich and never suffer and they want to be above the law,they are sociopaths and they want us as slaves work until we die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. "a setback for the Bush administration..."
yeah, right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. A setback for the administration.
Uh-huh. I can just hear Cheyney bitching about those activist judges interfering with justice.

Someone was probably going to use tie ins from the Arthur Anderson case to support charges against Enron. This neatly undermines that approach. Kenny Boy is going to walk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Kenny's actions financially cripped 5000 people. Now, flame me on this,
isn't kenny's actions far worse than the hijackers * knew about on 9/11?

Our country is about money, not people. The 3000 people (plus 1600+ US soldiers) are dead. 5000 (plus all the other lives these filthy corporate hijackers have hurt or ruined) are hurting, with no income.

No income means no life. For many. Some killed themselves because of kenny. (though one or two of them were kenny's cohorts).

kenny is despicable. As much so as Osama. Terrorism is far more than ramming planes into big badly built buildings. It's hurting people down to the core. kenny is one such person, he is a terrorist too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Just like the savings and loan scandle...
Those fuckers ruined and killed thousands with their stealing, yet because that was a "white collar" crime, you will never see the bodies.

I remember a statistic from back than that I never forgot.

They stole the equivalent to allow 100,000 people buy a house. 100,000 people! How many of those people, who deserved a loan were turned down so they could line their pockets? And what about the thousands that did have loans out to these banks? They lost their homes because these institutions defaulted on their loans.

Vile fuckers, everyone of them.

Now we have Enron, with butt buddy kenny boy, that screwed all these people out of their jobs, pensions, stocks, 401k's, etc. The collateral damage is epic! How many kids won't go to college now? How many have to go on welfare? How many go on the Medicaid rolls? How many families were ruined?
He will get a slap on the wrist, go to the rich mans prison, retire and write a book, professing his mia culpa to the nation. Typical repuke.

The bottom line to this administration is this: They don't give a shit.

Once the rest of the nation truly realizes this, it will only be then they will be brought up on charges and brought before the whole world as the crooks they are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Well, I wouldn't call him a butt buddy...
Bush licker, maybe... though "The devil's third-in-command" seems most apropos.

Pity about what's happening in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Love your handle. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-31-05 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. And how 'bout those domestic oil programs, eh?
GULFPORT, Miss. — Tucked away in the 96-page emergency military spending bill signed by President Bush this month are four paragraphs that give energy companies the right to explore for oil and gas inside a sprawling national park.

The amendment written by Sen. Thad Cochran (R-Miss.) codifies Mississippi's claim to mineral rights under federal lands and allows drilling for natural gas under the Gulf Islands National Seashore — a thin necklace of barrier islands that drapes the coastline of the Gulf of Mexico.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1511587
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC