Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FAA Managers Destroyed 9/11 Tape

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Nordmadr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:37 PM
Original message
FAA Managers Destroyed 9/11 Tape
FAA Managers Destroyed 9/11 Tape
Recording Contained Accounts of Communications With Hijacked Planes

By Sara Kehaulani Goo
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, May 6, 2004; 6:16 PM

Six air traffic controllers provided accounts of their communications with hijacked planes on Sept. 11, 2001, on a tape recording that was later destroyed by Federal Aviation Administration managers, according to a government investigative report issued today.

It is unclear what information was on the tape because no one ever listened to, transcribed or duplicated it, the report by the Department of Transportation inspector general said.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A6632-2004May6¬Found=true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. they cut it into pieces
and threw each piece into a different trash can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. why can't they come out and talk about what happened....?
let them come on Randi's show and have an open Q&A?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Exactly what I've been wondering...
It's not like they could have possibly forgotten what went on that day! I guess my feeling is that they have been "convinced" it's in their best interest to keep quiet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalVoice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. fucking liars
You can bet somebody listened to it before it was destroyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalVoice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fucking liars.
You can bet "somebody" listened to that tape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. worth saying twice
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalVoice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. lol
whoops...I guess the first one did go through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. Tampering with evidence
:mad: Of course they'd want to get rid of those tapes. If you go to the September 11th section of the site I made a post about the tape's from the doc "Loose Change." If you haven't seen it you should. It tells how on the audio tapes is all types of information that can me damning. The box's also tell what type of plane it was. Here's info about the black box that talks about the audio tape's and why they'd want to get rid of them.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x41527
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. Another snip from "9/11 Timeline." Maybe the destroyed tape would
have verified information about the discrepancies between Norad and FAA timelines for the morning of 9/11.

........................................

July 31, 2004

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Sen. Mark Dayton, D-Minn., charged Friday that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) have covered up "catastrophic failures" that left the nation vulnerable during the Sept. 11 hijackings.

"For almost three years now, NORAD officials and FAA officials have been able to hide their critical failures that left this country defenseless during two of the worst hours in our history," Dayton declared during a Senate Governmental Affairs Committee hearing.

(snip)

During the hearing, Dayton told leaders of the Sept. 11 commission, that, based on the commission's report, a NORAD chronology made public a week after the attacks was grossly misleading. The chronology said the FAA notified the military's emergency air command of three of the hijackings while those jetliners were still airborne. Dayton cited commission findings that the FAA failed to inform NORAD about three of the planes until after they had crashed.

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20040731213239607
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kind of an old story, isn't it?
But still, something that should have caused widespread inquiry. If nothing else, you keep that for its historical value. Somebody wanted it destroyed for a reason, and they got their wish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordmadr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. It was linked front page from Raw Story and
certainly seems relevant. Noticed it was a year old after I posted it, but no less pertinent to things now.

Olaf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, what a 'mistake'!
Will those FAA managers be hired by Arthur Andersen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Some DU'ers remember when this was reported a long time ago. Why
is this in the WaPo today? Wonder if something else is coming up.

Hard to know what action will be taken from this report, though. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. This WaPo article is A MONTH OLD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordmadr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Actually it is a year old, see explanation. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. One year and one month old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. Jeeze....shoulda checked the date. But, still good to revisit old news
from time to time. There's so much old news that's never been resolved your head could start to spin. So many lies...so many. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. At the union's request

They destroyed it at the Union's request. The Union was afraid that the controllers, while still shook up from the attack, might have worded things in such a fashion that it could hurt them. Possibly make it look like it was their fault the warning did not get out earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. link???? that it was 'union's fault'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. I don't have a link
but I live with a controller and according to her, the tapes of the de-briefing shouldn't have been made in the first place. It's not regular procedure and against NATCA regulations to tape controllers testimony regarding air incidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. seems to me that the events of that day transcended any need to adhere..
to "regular procedure."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. yes and that's why the tapes were made
in that instance apparently they wanted to get their facts down because it was such a crazy day but from what I've been told taping controllers incident de-briefings are a no no.

My partner never trusts FAA management (30,000 overpaid paper pushers who go out of their way to make controllers lives miserable) but there seems to be a misunderstanding about intent here. It looks REALLY fishy I know. I just wish some controllers from NY would speak up about this to explain what happened. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Blame The Union? That's BS....
I want to know WHAT union official....that just smells, I don't believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Do you have any source that confirms this?
You'd think an anti-union administration like the current one would LOOOOOVE to have a scapegoat like that to try and pin 9/11 blame on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
34. bs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
35. Bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Combine with DSM...
Edited on Fri Jun-03-05 02:47 PM by Triana
...drip
...drip
...drip

My. The tangled trails McLiar leaves. I wonder why this is reappearing now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordmadr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. It simply further highlights a long list of covering up
and deceiving. You know, to those things known as patterns that begin to clearly show an "intent" to mislead.


Olaf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. Strange way to destroy evidence
If I wanted to get rid of the tape, I'd take it to some secluded area, pour lighter fluid on the reel, light a match, stand downwind for a half hour, and then have the ashes scattered in a tire dump.

This is, of course, assuming that I was an FAA administrator with something really awful to hide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
17. we have known this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. I love this quote at the end
"The destruction of evidence in the Government's possession, in this case an audiotape -- particularly during times of national crisis -- has the effect of fostering an appearance that information is being withheld from the public." Well d'uh!

Why do I get the feeling that 911 is going to take the same path as the JFK assisnation. Lots and lots of us, digging around, breaking down the official story, people calling us cranks and conspiracy theorists, finally dragging it before some special government committee fifteen-twenty years after the fact, and that special committee will look at the overwhelming evidence of LIHOP/MIHOP, and meekly, quietly, against their will, be forced to conclude that yes indeed, 911 was a LIHOP/MIHOP conspiracy.

And even sadder is that like the JFK assisination, even with this official government acknowledgement of the truth, nothing further will be done, and 911 will follow JFK unwillingly into the darkness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
26. Blaming It On "A Union Official?"
Oh yeah right. WHO ORDERED THOSE TAPES DESTROYED? We need names, memos, the works. full investigation into this incident is called for!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
29. There are no coincidences.
None.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. No coincidences: "...no one ever listened to, transcribed or duplicated
(the tapes).)

Stinking to high heaven.

Glad you all brought this up again. Needs to be revisited, investigated, and then heads should roll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
33. Why am I not surprised!!! And we will never get their names!!!
But Someday we will!!! How they sleep at night has got to be hard!!!

Nobody listened to it Ya Right!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
36. From the original NY Times article
http://www.dfw.com/mld/startelegram/2004/05/07/news/nation/8612203.htm

Air traffic control supervisor destroyed 9-11 comment tape

By Matthew L. Wald

The New York Times

WASHINGTON - At least six air traffic controllers who dealt with two of the hijacked airliners on Sept. 11, 2001, made a tape recording a few hours later describing the events, but the tape was destroyed by a supervisor without anyone making a transcript or even listening to it, the Transportation Department said Thursday.

The taping began before noon on Sept. 11 at the New York Air Route Traffic Control Center, in Ronkonkoma, N.Y., where about 16 people met in a basement conference room known as the Bat Cave and passed around a microphone, each recalling his or her version of the events of a few hours earlier. The recording included statements of five or 10 minutes each by controllers who had spoken by radio to people on the planes or who had tracked the aircraft on radar, a report said.

Officials at the center never told superiors of the tape's existence, according to the report, which was made public Thursday by the Transportation Department's inspector general.

A quality-assurance manager at the center destroyed the tape several months after it was made, crushing the cassette in his hand, then cutting the tape into little pieces and dropping them in trash cans around the building, according to the report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
37. NO!!!!!!
I am actually shocked at this, and I am shocked that the MSM reported it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC