Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did the secret vote on the Patriot Act take place after Sensenbrenner

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 11:58 AM
Original message
Did the secret vote on the Patriot Act take place after Sensenbrenner
Edited on Mon Jun-13-05 11:58 AM by BR_Parkway
illegally shut down the hearing? I've seen stories on both, but nothing that puts the time line together.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1542288
Secret vote on Patriot Act angers some conservatives

http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/fl20_schultz/judgavelledoff.html
US Rep tells how Sensenbrenner violated both House rules and laws in shutting down democracy.


edit for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ScamUSA.Com Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I believe ones referring to the house
and the other the Senate.

I watched the Sensenbrenner hearing rerun on C-SPAN... his behavior was shameful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-05 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. No, it was a Senate Intelligence Committee that voted.
WASHINGTON - A closed-door vote by the Senate Intelligence Committee to expand law enforcement powers under the USA Patriot Act is prompting sharp criticism from some conservative leaders who are otherwise among the most vocal allies of President Bush and the Republican leadership.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1542288
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm pretty sure the vote was first.......
Edited on Mon Jun-13-05 12:07 PM by converted_democrat
I think I remember it like a week or two back. A couple of people walked out of it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. True fascist tactics at least they did not burn down the Capitol.

This appears to be a blatant power play close to a coup.
Amazing how History is repeated.
For a review of history:

When Hitler was appointed in January 1933, Germany was a democracy. Germany had fair elections; nobody had their right to vote abused; there were numerous political parties you could vote for etc. To pass a law, the Reichstag had to agree to it after a bill went through the normal processes of discussion, arguments etc. Within the Reichstag of January 1933, over 50% of those who held seats were against the Nazi Party. Therefore it would have been very unlikely for Hitler to have got passed into law what he wanted. Many saw Hitler as a fall-guy politician who would have to shoulder to blame if things got worse under his leadership.

Hitler had promised a general election for March 1933. This would have been, in his mind, the perfect opportunity for him to show all politicians who opposed him where the true loyalties lay in the German people. In fact, 1932 had shown Hitler that there was a possibility that support for the Nazis had peaked as their showing in the November 1932 election had shown. Anything other than a huge endorsement of Hitler and the Nazi Party would have been a disaster and a gamble which it is possible that Hitler did not want to take.

One week before the election was due to take place, the Reichstag building burned down. Hitler immediately declared that it was the signal for a communist takeover of the nation. Hitler knew that if he was to convince President Hindenburg to give him emergency powers - as stated in the Weimar Constitution - he had to play on the old president's fear of communism. What better than to convince him that the communists were about to take over the nation by force?

see link: http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/Nazi_Germany_dictatorship.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. It looks that way
Senslessbringer had the hearing early on Friday morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-13-05 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. The were holding private sessions during the Filibuster
I tried to say that the attention was being diverted at a time when we needed to be looking at the expansion of this (no-rights-for-us) patriot act. They have pretty much raped our rights when we were looking the other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC