Scott Ritter..

once said that an attack on Iran will take place in June...still think that's in the works for this...especially to distract from the Downing Street Minutes?

half over but I wonder if they planned on having Bolton in place first?

see how the DSM heats up in the coming days/weeks..

A tragedy of unimaginable proportions.

Of course when has reality or need for assessment ever influenced Bush?

Here is what he said....
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/index.php?p=170

3/11/2005

"By June 2005" is a whole lot different than "in June 2005."

:thumbsup:

But his timing it closer to the '06 election--Clark says most likely June '06.

He said publicly that BushCo will most likely draw down some troups (40,000 out of the 180,000 there now) out of Iraq for photo-op PR coming home purposes at the end of this summer (to calm the natives in America and in Iraq, and attempt to raise his approval%.... shall we say).

That way an Iran crisis in 2006 would play out better.

As you may know....Republicans will use whatever they can to continue winning elections, including using whatever works in enhancing their perceived strength--National Security. The Iraq Invasion resolution was used in 2002, 9/11 was used adnauseum during the 2004 election (see GOP convention), the Bin Laden tape came out for a reason as the '04 election October suprise (tape released on Oct 29th).

So I certainly wouldn't at all put it passed them, to use some kind of Iran showdown in 2006. In BushCo. World, everything is political.

Interviewed him would know, we should ask her damn it (hehehe).

that an Iran attack would come with the same kind of propaganda preparation that accompanied the Rape of Iraq.

The Crusaders can no longer afford to subject their lies to the scrutiny of their critics for weeks at a time. 9/11 and the WMD lies have put paid to any credibility.

All they have to operate with is shock and awe.

If the strike on Iran happens, it will be half-over by the time you hear about it. Some provocation will be manufactured: a "surprise" Iranian incursion into Iraq, a "Qaeda agent" seen going into the Iranian nuclear plant, a suicide bomber's belt "discovered" on the corpse of a Persian in Podunk.

The bombs will be dropping on Iran at the same time that CNN starts feeding you the official conspiracy theory about the casus belli.

Watch for a double-play in which Israel takes the opportunity to engage in its required, once-in-a-generation destruction of the Syrian military.

with your scenario.

The tactics used to F*ck over Iran will be of a different variation.

He said that in June, the US would withdraw from the negotiations table with the EU, and force sanctions. Plans are, however, on the table for an Iran strike.

are blaming U.S. backed opposition groups, or as we like to call opposition these days, terrorists.

Even if he didn't say it precisely, he once again proves he knows what he's talking about.

I'd been noticing the same thing.

An awful lot of explosions in Iran as of late....

points to the case that Ritter was correct .... the campaigne in Iran may
be covertly under way now ....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1546282

Peace.