Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How does * get such control over the corporate media ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 06:38 AM
Original message
How does * get such control over the corporate media ?
Does anyone know of any open or veiled threats to them ? Someone who works in the media ? Or is it that the Bushco agenda dovetails with their own ? Thanks in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not complicated. They LIKE him.
He's good for business. They're in business. Ergo....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Even less complicated. They ARE him.
Edited on Thu Jun-23-05 07:07 AM by RUMMYisFROSTED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Exactly. He and all his cabinet are CEO types. They are the club.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HawkerHurricane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Backwards.
The question should be, "How did the corporate media get such control over Bush?"

The Corporations are pulling the strings here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. $$$$$$$$$$$
and more $$$$$$$$$. If you want the answer...follow the $$$$$$.

That is all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think it is all about access.
Piss off the WH, no interviews, no info...nothing. Then all we are stuck with is Jennifer Willbanks, that Utah Boy Scout and the Aruba Chick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. A lot of it is through denial of access if you are perceived "unfriendly"
as well as outright intimidation ("watch what you say, watch what you do"). Most of this work was done early in shrub's first term and you see the effect now.

Of course, the news outlets COULD actually have courage and say, you know what? We don't need this, we're going to ask real questions, and if the WH wants to boot us out and fill the press corps with Talon News and expose themselves that way, fine.

But of course they don't have the courage to do this.

There is a longer and more complicated answer to your question, which is that the Republicans have had a strategy to control and coopt the media dating back since Nixon, which has been decades long in the making. Key steps in this include the elimination of the fairness doctrine and the creation of FOX news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. I first heard of "denial of access" during the Reagan administration
Edited on Thu Jun-23-05 09:52 AM by Lydia Leftcoast
Now if the owners of media had actually had GUTS instead of a burning desire to be included in the A-List cocktail parties, they would have instructed their reporters to say, "We wanted to interview the president, but he denied us because we refuse to kiss his ass."

But I suppose that in real life, all the corporate sponsors would have withdrawn their commercials from any such media outlet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. Using taxpayer assests to bribes them just like ..
he does with the churches. They do his bidding and the FCC and justice department and congress will look away as they violate anti-trust and consolidation rules. If they expose what he is really doing, the FCC, justice department and congress will crack down on them. Simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. I agree with 3, 4, and 5
It is a system of money(bribes), access, and intimidation. Of course wealthy republicans are more than happy to create newspapers and television news that will outright lie to support the regime.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. Reagan, and later Clinton, deregulated the media. Reagan did away with
the Fairness Doctrine. Now 6 uber rich ultraconservative Republicans own all the media in the US, except for a handful of Mon and Pop outlets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. All of the above
Money, threats, bribes, deals, common viewpoint, greed ...

Of course, there are little things that reinforce the "loyalty", like
getting the son of your (1st term) Secretary of State as FCC chairman,
anthrax letters to editors who published "unwelcome" stories/photos,
advertising revenues being under the control of the major players ...

See? There's nothing unethical or immoral about lying for the government
when you consider the alternative ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. Good question
Here's an article from makethemaccountable about corporate media ownership:

http://www.makethemaccountable.com/podvin/media/040627_MaximizingShareholderValue.htm

Podvin wrote a more specific story (which I think is linked to in this piece) about how "Neutron" Jack Welch, having already turned NBC News into a corporate cheerleading squad, made a deal with Karl Rove to promote Incurious George in exchange for FCC deregulation of NBC's media properties. It's one of the most horrible stories I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. That was very informative! Long article but worth reading.
And I thought when we get fair voting/paper receits...we could win!
Looks like we'll need to make a deal with Corp Media first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. both the bushturd and the corpomedia answer to the same bosses
Edited on Thu Jun-23-05 09:46 AM by leftofthedial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
15. Read the Forward in RFK Jr.'s new book....
he along with David Brock explain quite well how the USA media is controled by a RW propaganda machine with direction from the WH. It is fascinating and very disturbing with Grover Norquist at the helm!

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC