Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stupid Freeper "Questionnaire"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RedSox02 Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:00 AM
Original message
Stupid Freeper "Questionnaire"
Found this on the web today. Oh boy, aren't we clever, we can make a loaded questionnaire to make our argument.


'Bush's Illegal War' Questionnaire


Please answer as many of the following questions as you can, and as many with a straight face as possible. Please answer quickly as you already have all of the answers.





1. Since George W. Bush is evil, and thought by some to be far more dangerous than Saddam Hussein, could you please list the instances you are aware of where George W. Bush has ordered the murder, torture and rape of American citizens, like yourself, who oppose his presidency.



2. Could you list any sites of mass graves of American citizens ordered to be killed by the Bush administration?



3. Further, could you please list the instances you are aware of when George W. Bush has ordered the murder of members of his own family.



4. Do you feel that Saddam Hussein possessed no weapons he was specifically forbidden to have by the UN; for example, the Scud missiles he fired into Kuwait during the first two weeks of the war?



5. How do you think Saddam was able to fire weapons that he didn't have?



6. Are inspectors inspectors, or are inspectors detectives?



7. How many more months would you have given Saddam Hussein to comply with the 17 UN resolutions, passed over 12 years?



8. If you owned an apartment building, for how many months would you allow a tenant to defy you to kick him out for not paying the rent he owes?



9. If the UN, and the previous administration, were convinced Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, and used that as a basis for their actions against Iraq, how do those reasons evaporate when applied by the Bush administration?



10. If the Bush administration, led by the evil GWB, lied about weapons of mass destruction in order to go to war, why haven't we found any WMD secretly planted by the Bush administration?



11. If you feel it would be too difficult to plant WMD in Iraq, because there are too many people watching, such that no one can do anything sneaky in Iraq, then why can't we find Saddam?



12. Do you disagree with the statement..."The weapons of mass destruction used in the 9/11 attacks were box-cutters"?



13. Do you think finding an airplane fuselage in a terrorist training camp in northern Iraq means terrorists were practicing hijackings? If not, for what purpose do you think they were using the airplane?



14. Knowing what little you may know about spy satellites, what do you think Iraq was hiding using the tunnel-digging equipment they bought from the French some 5 years ago?



15. Why do you think Iraq had a 'Higher Committee for Monitoring the Inspection Teams' headed by Hussein's Vice-President, and son, Qusay?



16. The fact that Iraq trained experts to foil UN weapons inspectors is documented not just by U.S. intelligence organizations, but by those of many other countries. Why do you think Iraq needed to use these tactics, if George W. Bush is lying?



17. In 1995, Iraq admitted it had biological weapons. They declared they had, for example, 8500 liters of anthrax. Where did they all go? If Iraq destroyed them, why would there be any need for more UN resolutions after that?



18. When do you think Iraq abandoned their existing Weapons of Mass Destruction program? What do you think was their motivation for abandoning it- the 17th time the UN said 'pretty please', or the fact that it was spending too much money that could used for social programs to improve the lives of Iraqi citizens?



19. Do you think the bio-weapons lab vehicles found in Iraq were being used as lunch wagons, or as mobile auto detail trucks?



20. If a terrorist organization attacked America tomorrow by spraying anthrax over a large city, would you blame George W. Bush for not doing enough?



21. Would Hillary?



22. How many minutes after the attack do you think it would take for Hillary to appear on CNN?



23. If an illegal U.S. president declares an illegal war, wouldn't the two cancel each other out?



Bonus Question: Do you think O.J. killed Ron and Nicole, or was he the victim of a massive conspiracy to plant evidence by many separate divisions of the LAPD?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. they are obsessed with Hillary Clinton
Why? I just don't get it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks, but I already have a hammer in my toolchest.
If I really feel the need to whack my own head with one, I'll take the one which I know where it's been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Regarding Question 4 - the Scud question
I think the net effect of the Scud's (or whatever they were - I thought the Iraqi missiles were a authorized missile system - not Scuds) was zippo. But the Patriot Missille system ended up killing several pilots because of false positive identification of US/Brit planes.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kusala Donating Member (864 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. facts?
1. Loaded and irrelevant. WMD's were the reason for war.
2. same as number 1
3. same as number 1
4. AFAIR, SCUDS werent on the UN list. Regardless, these were conventional warheads, not chemical. Scuds by themselves are not WMD's. WMD's were the reason for war. Did Saddam violate UN sanctions? Yes Did the UN vote to go to war? No. So again, the Bush case for war was based on "imminent threats" and WMD's.
5. Loaded. Next
6. Let's ask the US inspectors that couldn't find WMD's either.
7. moot point now
8. Saddam was renting Iraq from the US? That's news to me!
9. It's called learning to cooperate with your neighbours, not playing cowboy(and then crawling back on your hands and knees)
10. well at least he/she got the evil GWB right
11. Ask your president. While you're at it ask him where OBL is too, and why he let OBL's family fly around and out of the country on 9/13 while the rest of us were grounded?
12. box cutters are not WMD's. If they are, then guns are WMD's too. They kill thousands also. Cancer must be a WMD too. Why aren't we spending 87 bil on cancer research instead of war?
13. what alleged terrorists organization did the camp belong to? Given our administration's current track record on making connections that don't exist, do we even know for sure it was a terrorist training camp and not an iraqi army training facility? After all, our military and police organizations practice various scenarios using actual mock ups of vehicles and buildings. What does this have to do with WMD's and imminent threats again? And why was it 15 of the 19 9/11 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia, not Iraq? In fact, none of them did?

14. maybe the same thing this freeper hides under his bed so mum won't know her 35 year old son looks at them.
15. get your news from anywhere but Rush?
16. where are those WMD's again?
17. It's a good thing the US found those missing WMD's post-war!! er..wait.
18. Not sure, but it's obvious by now that they did abandon it.
19. get your news from anywhere but Rush?
20. It can't happen. We invaded Iraq. We're winning the war on terror!
21. Couldn't help but bring a Clinton into it could ya? Can we say OBSESSED?
22. see 21.
23. I see you get your math from Rush also

Bonus: OJ did it.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. #3, I have photographic proof!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. My answers
1. Since George W. Bush is evil, and thought by some to be far more dangerous than Saddam Hussein, could you please list the instances you are aware of where George W. Bush has ordered the murder, torture and rape of American citizens, like yourself, who oppose his presidency.
Not really, but who knows what will happen in 30 years when someone releases the mountain of paperwork they've deemed Classified.


2. Could you list any sites of mass graves of American citizens ordered to be killed by the Bush administration?

Yeah, it's called the World Trade Center.

3. Further, could you please list the instances you are aware of when George W. Bush has ordered the murder of members of his own family.

No, there's still a few states left to ruin. Give it time.

4. Do you feel that Saddam Hussein possessed no weapons he was specifically forbidden to have by the UN; for example, the Scud missiles he fired into Kuwait during the first two weeks of the war?

This is a lie. No scud missile was ever fired into Kuwait. In fact, no scud missiles have been found in iraq. BTW, the missile that was fired into Kuwait hit an empty parking deck and had no chemical or biological contents.

5. How do you think Saddam was able to fire weapons that he didn't have?

Like I said, lie.

6. Are inspectors inspectors, or are inspectors detectives?

I don't know. But they didn't find anything. And neither have we.

7. How many more months would you have given Saddam Hussein to comply with the 17 UN resolutions, passed over 12 years?

As long as it took to actually find something like chemicals or biological weapons.

8. If you owned an apartment building, for how many months would you allow a tenant to defy you to kick him out for not paying the rent he owes?

Eh?

9. If the UN, and the previous administration, were convinced Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, and used that as a basis for their actions against Iraq, how do those reasons evaporate when applied by the Bush administration?

Clinton blew them all up in 98.

10. If the Bush administration, led by the evil GWB, lied about weapons of mass destruction in order to go to war, why haven't we found any WMD secretly planted by the Bush administration?

Because GWB is a moron. But give it time.

11. If you feel it would be too difficult to plant WMD in Iraq, because there are too many people watching, such that no one can do anything sneaky in Iraq, then why can't we find Saddam?

Because GWB is a moron.

12. Do you disagree with the statement..."The weapons of mass destruction used in the 9/11 attacks were box-cutters"?

Uh, I guess so. But none of the hijackers on 9/11 were Iraqis.

13. Do you think finding an airplane fuselage in a terrorist training camp in northern Iraq means terrorists were practicing hijackings? If not, for what purpose do you think they were using the airplane?

Actually, that was an Iranian terrorist group. If you knew anything about Iraq you would know that Saddam controlled squat in the north.

14. Knowing what little you may know about spy satellites, what do you think Iraq was hiding using the tunnel-digging equipment they bought from the French some 5 years ago?

Saddam Hussein. DUH!!!!!

15. Why do you think Iraq had a 'Higher Committee for Monitoring the Inspection Teams' headed by Hussein's Vice-President, and son, Qusay?

Did you expect them to just let a team of international inspectors go running around there country with no supervision?

16. The fact that Iraq trained experts to foil UN weapons inspectors is documented not just by U.S. intelligence organizations, but by those of many other countries. Why do you think Iraq needed to use these tactics, if George W. Bush is lying?

Where are the WMD?

17. In 1995, Iraq admitted it had biological weapons. They declared they had, for example, 8500 liters of anthrax. Where did they all go? If Iraq destroyed them, why would there be any need for more UN resolutions after that?

Clinton destroyed them in 98.

18. When do you think Iraq abandoned their existing Weapons of Mass Destruction program? What do you think was their motivation for abandoning it- the 17th time the UN said 'pretty please', or the fact that it was spending too much money that could used for social programs to improve the lives of Iraqi citizens?

I thought Bush said they had reconstituted a nuclear program. Get your reasoning straight!

19. Do you think the bio-weapons lab vehicles found in Iraq were being used as lunch wagons, or as mobile auto detail trucks?

Actually, they were sold to the Iraqis by the Brits and were for weather balloons. The Brits admit this.

20. If a terrorist organization attacked America tomorrow by spraying anthrax over a large city, would you blame George W. Bush for not doing enough?

Yes

21. Would Hillary?

Yes

22. How many minutes after the attack do you think it would take for Hillary to appear on CNN?

I would give it a day.

23. If an illegal U.S. president declares an illegal war, wouldn't the two cancel each other out?

OMG, did you just give yourself away?

Bonus Question: Do you think O.J. killed Ron and Nicole, or was he the victim of a massive conspiracy to plant evidence by many separate divisions of the LAPD?

Probably killed her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. Regarding # 23 - Guess that Belgium looked at the $$ that
Bush was holding back, and said "Never mind."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. Answer
Look asshole, it's simple. George W. Bush sold this war to congress and the American people based upon the threat of imminent danger from saddam hussein using weapons of mass destruction. Those charges have now been shown to be completely without merit. It is also pretty clear that this administration knew this all along. As a citizen of this country I am pissed off that my government would lie to me about starting a fucking war.

How about you take your questions and stick em where the sun doesn't shine you stupid schmuck since you clearly don't give a shit about the principles that this country was founded upon and only wish to further the agenda of a group of people who wish to destroy those principles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. Please help me!
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 10:18 AM by Padraig18
My head just exploded! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. Answer to #1:
Those acts were ordered by his Attorney General, John Ashcroft.

Answer to #2:
The place in Minnesota containing the site of the crash of the small plane carrying Members of Paul Wellstone's family and his campaign staff.

Answer to #3:
Jeb Bush, if he didn't come through on the Florida re-count cover-up in November 2000! :eyes:

Answer to #14:
Maybe all that oil-drilling equipment Iraq purchased from Halliburton seven years ago! :eyes:

Answer to #15:
Because they were spying on the inspectors the same way John Ashcroft abused the authority of the Patriot Act to spy on American citizens!

Answer to #20:
Yes, and I already have.

Answer to #21:
Yes, she would, because yes, she would have!

Answer to #23:
No; two wrongs do not make a right.

Answer to Bonus one:
It ALWAYS boils down to "Hillary, the Fags and those Nigras" to you right-wingers, doesn't it? :mad:

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. Some Answers (and a big waste of time. I need a life.)
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 10:53 AM by HFishbine
1. Since George W. Bush is evil, and thought by some to be far more dangerous than Saddam Hussein, could you please list the instances you are aware of where George W. Bush has ordered the murder, torture and rape of American citizens, like yourself, who oppose his presidency.

I wish I could. But with due process thrown out the window and with the secrecy surrounding this adminstration I can't be sure.

2. Could you list any sites of mass graves of American citizens ordered to be killed by the Bush administration?

See #1.

3. Further, could you please list the instances you are aware of when George W. Bush has ordered the murder of members of his own family.

None. He reserves for them a compassion he doesn't extend to other American familes.

4. Do you feel that Saddam Hussein possessed no weapons he was specifically forbidden to have by the UN; for example, the Scud missiles he fired into Kuwait during the first two weeks of the war?

I'm keeping an open mind. Can you show me proof that he had any? As for the "scuds" fired at Kuwait. Please try to keep up. That notion has been retracted: http://www.fair.org/activism/scuds.html

5. How do you think Saddam was able to fire weapons that he didn't have?

Because, a lie planted in the minds of those who want to beleive is as good as reality for some.

6. Are inspectors inspectors, or are inspectors detectives?

Yes.

7. How many more months would you have given Saddam Hussein to comply with the 17 UN resolutions, passed over 12 years?

By all verifiable accounts (which of course excludes Bush, Powell, Rumsfeld, et al), he was in near compliance, and those areas where he wasn't complying did not justify an attack.

8. If you owned an apartment building, for how many months would you allow a tenant to defy you to kick him out for not paying the rent he owes?

If you did not own an apartment building, but saw the potential to occupy it and start collecting rent, would you take it over at gun point?


9. If the UN, and the previous administration, were convinced Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, and used that as a basis for their actions against Iraq, how do those reasons evaporate when applied by the Bush administration?

If those reasons were dismissed then as a distraction from a blow job, how do they suddenly become substantive when the action escalates from a limited air campaign with no loss of American life to an all out invasion resulting in the loss of life for American troops?

10. If the Bush administration, led by the evil GWB, lied about weapons of mass destruction in order to go to war, why haven't we found any WMD secretly planted by the Bush administration?

GWB may be evil, but he's not an idiot. (Well, at least his puppetmasters aren't.)


11. If you feel it would be too difficult to plant WMD in Iraq, because there are too many people watching, such that no one can do anything sneaky in Iraq, then why can't we find Saddam?

Agreed. The opportunity does exist to plant wfake WMDs in Iraq.

12. Do you disagree with the statement..."The weapons of mass destruction used in the 9/11 attacks were box-cutters"?

Yes.

13. Do you think finding an airplane fuselage in a terrorist training camp in northern Iraq means terrorists were practicing hijackings? If not, for what purpose do you think they were using the airplane?

Do you mean the Kurdish controled area of Iraq overwhich Hussein had no control?

14. Knowing what little you may know about spy satellites, what do you think Iraq was hiding using the tunnel-digging equipment they bought from the French some 5 years ago?

Ummm. Tunnels? What do you think he was hiding? WMDs?


15. Why do you think Iraq had a 'Higher Committee for Monitoring the Inspection Teams' headed by Hussein's Vice-President, and son, Qusay?

To monitor the activities of inspection teams?

16. The fact that Iraq trained experts to foil UN weapons inspectors is documented not just by U.S. intelligence organizations, but by those of many other countries. Why do you think Iraq needed to use these tactics, if George W. Bush is lying?

Dr Blix said in February that the UN had conducted more than 400 inspections, all without notice, covering more than 300 sites. "We note that access to sites has so far been without problems."

17. In 1995, Iraq admitted it had biological weapons. They declared they had, for example, 8500 liters of anthrax. Where did they all go? If Iraq destroyed them, why would there be any need for more UN resolutions after that?

That admission, from an Iraqi defctor, also included the assertation that the agents were destroyed. If you beleive part of the claim, why suspect the rest?


18. When do you think Iraq abandoned their existing Weapons of Mass Destruction program? What do you think was their motivation for abandoning it- the 17th time the UN said 'pretty please', or the fact that it was spending too much money that could used for social programs to improve the lives of Iraqi citizens?

Because sanctions and international pressure where working.

19. Do you think the bio-weapons lab vehicles found in Iraq were being used as lunch wagons, or as mobile auto detail trucks?

This discovery has already been so thoroughly debunked that its continued assertion cast doubt upon all credibility.

20. If a terrorist organization attacked America tomorrow by spraying anthrax over a large city, would you blame George W. Bush for not doing enough?

No. I'd suspect he was trying to increase his election chances.

21. Would Hillary?

Would Hillary what?

22. How many minutes after the attack do you think it would take for Hillary to appear on CNN?

Not sure. But with Bush's demonstrated propensity to run and hide, I wouldn't be surprised if someone with some balls appeared before he did.

23. If an illegal U.S. president declares an illegal war, wouldn't the two cancel each other out?

If an idiot falls in the forest, would anybody care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Very good! <applause, applause>
This one was my favorite:

8. If you owned an apartment building, for how many months would you allow a tenant to defy you to kick him out for not paying the rent he owes?

If you did not own an apartment building, but saw the potential to occupy it and start collecting rent, would you take it over at gun point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Great answers.. should have read yours before posting mine...
Edited on Wed Sep-24-03 11:52 AM by gully
;) I'm laughing out loud...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
13. Answers...
1. Since George W. Bush is evil, and thought by some to be far more dangerous than Saddam Hussein, could you please list the instances you are aware of where George W. Bush has ordered the murder, torture and rape of American citizens, like yourself, who oppose his presidency.

Paul Wellstone...JFK Junior?

2. Could you list any sites of mass graves of American citizens ordered to be killed by the Bush administration?

Check our various military cemetary's.

3. Further, could you please list the instances you are aware of when George W. Bush has ordered the murder of members of his own family.

Well, by Right Wing standards he ordered his girlfriend to abort their love child in the 1970's.

4. Do you feel that Saddam Hussein possessed no weapons he was specifically forbidden to have by the UN; for example, the Scud missiles he fired into Kuwait during the first two weeks of the war?

I believe Hans Blix and Scott Ritter-the weapons inspectors

5. How do you think Saddam was able to fire weapons that he didn't have?

Uhm, were talking the 1980's here ... idiot ? :eyes:


6. Are inspectors inspectors, or are inspectors detectives?

huh?

7. How many more months would you have given Saddam Hussein to comply with the 17 UN resolutions, passed over 12 years?

This is up to the UN, as they are UN resolutions. And, little fact, SADDAM WAS COMPLYING. Inspectors were in the country doing there job before Bush and co. kicked them out. Those pesky facts.

8. If you owned an apartment building, for how many months would you allow a tenant to defy you to kick him out for not paying the rent he owes?

Is this in reference to the Supreme court Selection of George W? Hopefully he'll be evicted in 2004.

9. If the UN, and the previous administration, were convinced Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, and used that as a basis for their actions against Iraq, how do those reasons evaporate when applied by the Bush administration?

They were convinced that they were 'destroyed' get it! 90-95% disarmed mmmk?

10. If the Bush administration, led by the evil GWB, lied about weapons of mass destruction in order to go to war, why haven't we found any WMD secretly planted by the Bush administration?

Good question, I heard they tried to pull it off, but it failed.

11. If you feel it would be too difficult to plant WMD in Iraq, because there are too many people watching, such that no one can do anything sneaky in Iraq, then why can't we find Saddam?

He's already underground k?

12. Do you disagree with the statement..."The weapons of mass destruction used in the 9/11 attacks were box-cutters"?

Yes, yes I do.

Do you disagree with the statement that the Bush administration was warned about 911 and Bushie boy vacationed instead of acting?

13. Do you think finding an airplane fuselage in a terrorist training camp in northern Iraq means terrorists were practicing hijackings? If not, for what purpose do you think they were using the airplane?

uhm, to fly perhaps? However, I am not convinced the 'terrorist' training camps were as such.

14. Knowing what little you may know about spy satellites, what do you think Iraq was hiding using the tunnel-digging equipment they bought from the French some 5 years ago?

Is this one of the 'real' pieces of evidence, or fabricated ones? However, If I were to venture a guess, I'd say they made the underground tunnels Saddam lives in today.

15. Why do you think Iraq had a 'Higher Committee for Monitoring the Inspection Teams' headed by Hussein's Vice-President, and son, Qusay?

Because the US had planted CIA agents as inspectors previously.

16. The fact that Iraq trained experts to foil UN weapons inspectors is documented not just by U.S. intelligence organizations, but by those of many other countries. Why do you think Iraq needed to use these tactics, if George W. Bush is lying?

WMD evidence was 'documented' too? However, would you send your son/daughter to die based on this 'evidence'?

17. In 1995, Iraq admitted it had biological weapons. They declared they had, for example, 8500 liters of anthrax. Where did they all go? If Iraq destroyed them, why would there be any need for more UN resolutions after that?

Well Bubba, The UN inspector Hans Blix addressed this and many other issues. He said, just because we can't account for them does not mean they exist. Let me also ask why Saddam didn't use the weapons of mass destruction if he had them?


18. When do you think Iraq abandoned their existing Weapons of Mass Destruction program? What do you think was their motivation for abandoning it- the 17th time the UN said 'pretty please', or the fact that it was spending too much money that could used for social programs to improve the lives of Iraqi citizens?

In the 1990's under the Clinton Administration, remember. Dont suppose you do?

19. Do you think the bio-weapons lab vehicles found in Iraq were being used as lunch wagons, or as mobile auto detail trucks?

I think they were used for satelite systems as has been reported even by Faux news.

20. If a terrorist organization attacked America tomorrow by spraying anthrax over a large city, would you blame George W. Bush for not doing enough?

YUP! Our billions spent in Iraq could have been used to actually protect American citizens, not kill our children in a useless war and the children of Iraq to boot.

21. Would Hillary?

I sure as hell hope so.

22. How many minutes after the attack do you think it would take for Hillary to appear on CNN?

:eyes: pathetic Hilary facination.

23. If an illegal U.S. president declares an illegal war, wouldn't the two cancel each other out?

Unfortunately, the illegal president still controls our tax dollars so no.

Bonus Question: Do you think O.J. killed Ron and Nicole, or was he the victim of a massive conspiracy to plant evidence by many separate divisions of the LAPD?

Yep, OJ killed Nicole, but his $$ bought his freedom. Funny how that works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-03 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. Regarding # 1 - It's not a question of Evil, it's a question of
LEVEL OF EVIL.

On an individual basis, yes, Saddam is more evil than Bush.

But we see that, until proven otherwise, Bush is the only one of the two to have used weapons of mass destruction on the other. Remember MOAB? Last time Saddam used WMDs on his own people, Reagan & Bush I looked the other way, and Bush II kept working with Iraq up until two months before Saddam invaded Kuwait.

And, if you want to talk about working with the evil one, then Cheney worked with Iraq clear up through most of 1998.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC