Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was WMD ever mentioned????? hmmmmm.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:31 PM
Original message
Was WMD ever mentioned????? hmmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. was Afghanistan ever mentioned?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. WMD? What's that?
I thought we invaded Iraq because Saddam was so evil he needed to be removed?


:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. after listening tonight, we invaded Iraq because of 9/11
but "they" won't defeat us. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Hey, girl! How ya' doin?
And BTW, the resident of the WH is the supreme POS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. good and agree with the POS statement
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RareLubbockDem Donating Member (299 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent points EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. yes regarding Lybia only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. White Male Divorced?
This isn't a dating ad, dude.

This is a speech about WAR and other MANLY shit.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Russert said bush redefined the mission
was originally wmd now its defeat terrorists
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. definition: after being caught in lie after lie, he comes up with another
lame ass reason to go to Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. pelosi kicking some ass now on nbc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. No, but "Go West Minister Devils!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. No, no mention of WMD
Even the media psychophants mentioned that he might invite criticism for invoking 9/11 as a reason for the war in Iraq.

David Guergen is trying to convince us that we heard something important. But, I'm shocked. Paula Zahn interrupted him and said 'but we've heard all of that before, David'. Now, he's admitting that connecting Iraq to 9/11 will get him in trouble.

They lie with impunity ~ Paula is insisting 'But, David, you know that he is opening himself up to criticism, because there is NO connection between 9/11 and Iraq'. She's doing great!! But David Guergen is saying he thinks, even though WE (they are smarter than us, remember) meaning journalists, know the truth, this playing of the 9/11 card will work for him!!!

I think we have to email David Guergen and let him know that Paula seems to have learned, that we are as smart as he is and NO, the 9/11 card will not only not work, it is INFURIATING!!! And all the more so, because Guergen is applauding the lie!

Paula Zahn really tried this time. I think she knows, we will not be fooled ~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. From Think Progress No WMD mention
Bush Iraq Speech: By The Numbers
References to gSeptember 11: 5

References to gweapons of mass destructionh: 0

References to gfreedomh: 21

References to gexit strategyh: 0

References to gSaddam Husseinh: 2

References to gOsama Bin Ladenh: 2

References to ga mistakeh: 1 (setting a timetable for withdrawal)

References to gmissionh: 11

References to gmission accomplishedh: 0

http://thinkprogress.org/2005/06/28/bush-iraq-speech-by-the-numbers/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ailsagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
15. Here is what was mentioned and how many times...
References to "September 11?: 5

References to "weapons of mass destruction": 0

References to "freedom": 21

References to "exit strategy": 0

References to "Saddam Hussein": 2

References to "Osama Bin Laden": 2

References to "a mistake": 1 (setting a timetable for withdrawal)

References to "mission": 11

References to "mission accomplished": 0

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/6/28/212422/545

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. No WMD, but Plenty of 9/11
By my count (speech started at 8:00 pm)

9/11 Reference #1 at 8:02 p.m.
9/11 Reference #2 at 8:04 p.m.
9/11 Reference #3 at 8:09 p.m.
9/11 Reference #4 at 8:24 p.m.


BTW - Suprisingly, Bush referred to Osama Bin Laden by name...

Osama Reference #1 at 8:07 p.m.
Osama Reference #2 at 8:09 p.m.

1st spontaneous applause did not occur until 8:25 p.m.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wideopen Donating Member (563 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. I kept count of everything
not even one mention. Figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. Now why did you go and bring that up?
They want you to think 9/11 not WMD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC