Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why isn't Novak going to jail?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 07:55 AM
Original message
Why isn't Novak going to jail?
I don't get it - why the others and not him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. So do I. Keep the sexual euphemisms for x-rated forums, please.
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
greekspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. Let us just see what happens before the statute of limitations runs out
For the crimes he has apparently committed, there is surely a healthy statute of limitations. Sure the Borg is in power, but as Star Trek fans know, even the Borg can be defeated. Someday, a party that is not the Republican party, will be after him like white on rice. It may be a while, and I am not even sure any more what that party will be called. But his day will come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MemphisTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I don't think there is a statute of limitations on treason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. He lied multiple times.
Then refused to disclose source. He could be held in contempt or perjury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Novak isn't concealing anything
It's been suggested by smarter people than I that he gave up the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Then how come we don't know the source, and why isn't the source
being convicted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Simple.
Those who have paid attention know the sources. The sources can't be convicted because they haven't been indicted yet; the grand jury needs to complete its investigation, and Miller & Cooper have taken actions that stretched it out for 11 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. Rumor has it that he cut a deal and sung to the GJ
The GJ proceedings which US Atty Pat Fitzgerald is conducting are sealed. If they bring in a true bill, then at trial it should come out if Novak did sing and was granted some sort of immunity for his testimony before the GJ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. Because he knows things that Bush Co. dont want released..
That is my best guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. Simple.
He didn't break the law. Miller and Cooper have. How is that difficult to understand?

Writing the infamous article broke no laws. Refusing to cooperate with a federal grand jury breaks a law. Our system of justice has consequences for breaking laws. That is not so complicated that it should be cause for confusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Let's Go One Step Further
The reason Miller and Cooper's testimony is important is because of things Novak has said. They can either corraborate or refute...thus making Fitzgerald's job a lot easier. Without it, he has to go with a lot of he said/she said.

From what I was reading, Fitzgerald already has indictments ready to present, but wants to exhaust all avenues on these reporters as their testimony could drastically affect how this case is prosecuted. I don't know how he'll play this now...push for the indictments now or see what other options he has, but I suspect this case will start moving off center in the weeks/months ahead now.

Regarding Novak, the people who should be exerting the pressure are his own peers...the people who he's betraying by refusing to come clean about his source and letting two other journalists he told take the heat. This is not "protecting sources"...this is covering one's ass.

Remember, whomever this leaker was, it had to be someone with some very high access of power...and that is a small number of people. These reporters aren't protecting some unknown, who upon coming forward, could put their life or livelihood in peril.

Cheers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. One thing .....
Miller and Cooper's testimony will not reflect on Novak's .... it has to do with John Hannah's testimony. It will have to do with if the mid-level officials are attempting to fall on their swords to protect two high level officials named Bolton and Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. Because he is old and rich and has influential friends in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lowell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'd like to see him making license plates
right next to Bush, Rove and Rummy. His loose lips caused deaths in the intelligence community. They all belong in prison where they can do the least harm to society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
15. He's not a leftie or moderate. He's pro-* all the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lateo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. I heard that he turned into a song bird...
and sang for the authorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patty Diana Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-29-05 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
18. because he's a bush whoremonger fascist repuke_that's why
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC