Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Double Standards Rule the Roose in the Wake of the London Bombings

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 06:58 PM
Original message
Double Standards Rule the Roose in the Wake of the London Bombings
From the new World Media Watch up now at http://www.zianet.com/insightanalytical
Tomorrow at Buzzflash.com

1//The News International, Pakistan Sunday July 10, 2005-- Jamadi Us Sani 02, 1426 A.H.

http://www.jang.com.pk/thenews/jul2005-daily/10-07-2005/world/w4.htm



DOUBLE STANDARDS RULE THE ROOST IN THE WAKE OF THE LONDON BOMBINGS

By Kaleem Omar



KARACHI: At 5.49 pm (British Summer Time) on Thursday, July 7, only nine hours after four bomb blasts in London killed at least 50 people and injured 700 others, the United Nations Security Council passed a resolution condemning the London attacks and expressing "outrage and indignation" at the "appalling terrorist attacks against the people of the United Kingdom that cost human life and caused injuries and immense human suffering."



All such attacks are to be condemned in the strongest possible terms, of course. But how is it that the UN Security Council has not to this day passed a resolution condemning the US bombing of Afghanistan in 2001 or the US bombing of Iraq in 2003, which killed thousands of innocent Afghan and Iraqi civilians, including women and children?



Were the lives of the 50 people killed in the London bomb blasts more valuable than the lives of the estimated 15,000 civilians killed in Afghanistan and the estimated 100,000 civilians killed in Iraq by US bombing and missile strikes?



The answer, of course, is, no, they were not. All lives are equally valuable, whether they are those of people in the UK, Afghanistan, Iraq or anywhere else. So why has the UN Security Council never passed a resolution expressing outrage and indignation at the appalling US attacks against the people of Afghanistan and Iraq?

MORE



Note: this reads like an editorial but was found in the News section of the publication...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Simple answer: The US sits on the Security Council
Any condemnation against the US over Iraq or Afghanistan is invariably going to be killed by a US veto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. They were talking about this on Majority Report the other day.
Very good point that needs to be expressed more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. As this imbalance of justice build up
Terror attack on US and UK just don't have our sympathy no more.
Its so sad to hear so many people in our country saying "They deserve it"
It is a lose lose suituation... a greater evil begets and make smaller evil all right.
It is inevitable that an attack on US will occur again.
It would be very sad to see people on the street celebrating when this happen. But that will be how it is, a reality of the world we live in today.
A great evil has been commited in the name of the US and UK people and until and unless that is properly address this world going into a shit house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC