Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you want to ban video games?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:21 PM
Original message
Do you want to ban video games?
I don't want to ban video games. I hope you don't want to ban video games. I don't know anybody who wants to ban video games. I've heard of people who want to ban video games, generally they're the same people who want to also ban Harry Potter novels, sex education, and the Homosexual Agenda.

So why are Hillary Clinton and Joe Li...

So why are Hillary Clinton and other democrats who still have a shred of respectibility left pandering to these book burning nutjobs?

And please stop with "it's about responsible advertising, a good rating system, it leads to violence blah blah blah..."

Bullshit. Video game producers are responsible advertisers, and if you can't understand the rating system you're to stupid to be supervising kids anyway. This whole issue is about censorship. Period. Claiming otherwise is like saying the flag burning amendment is about outdoor burning bans for environmental protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hell no!
Shit, I'd sooner go out any BUY San Andreas than support a politician pulling stupid shit like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. You have some sort of news story link?
so we can see Sen. Clinton's remarks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Sorry. Per LBN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4morewars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Uh, it's pretty much common knowledge.
I'm sure one could easily find plenty of links with google.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Well, three things --
First, it's not necessarily common knowledge to everyone just because it's common knowledge to New Yorkers, gaming junkies, Clinton watchers, etc.

Second, I think people should source their stuff on DU whenever possible

Third, I'm extremely lazy and I don't want to have to look anything up :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4morewars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
36. LOL
Right on all three counts, the third one I'm taking your word on !

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/14/nyregion/14hillary.html?oref=login&pagewanted=print

WASHINGTON, July 13 - Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton is calling on federal regulators to investigate the latest version of Grand Theft Auto, a popular video game series that allows players to go on simulated crime sprees.

In a letter she is sending Thursday to the Federal Trade Commission, Mrs. Clinton expressed concern over reports that anyone who used a free code downloaded over the Internet could unlock sexually graphic images hidden inside the game, called Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas.

Mrs. Clinton asked the commission to determine "the source of this content," especially since the game can fall into the hands of young people. The game industry's self-policing unit, the Entertainment Software Rating Board, is investigating whether the maker of the game violated the industry rule requiring "full disclosure of pertinent content."

Mrs. Clinton also asked the commission to look into whether the industry erred in giving the game a rating of M, or mature, for players 17 years and older. National electronics store chains sell M-rated games but tend to avoid adult-only titles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeekMonkey Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hell no! Banning them would just drive them underground
just like banning drugs has

just like banning guns will

banning is NEVER the answer because the govt cannot provide 100% certainty that the ban is 100% enforced
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. they can take my video game when they pry it from my cold dead
hands...... and feet, 12 feet of heavy chain, 15 pounds of cement, 2 tubes of super glue, well you get the picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is foolishness
What the hell is Hillary doing on this? I am a mother of a teenager who plays Grand Theft Auto (hell, I bought it for him.) He hasn't done anything but have fun playing this imaginary game.

What the hell is up with Hillary? I'm not sending money to her if she does dumb, feel-good things like this. (What is this supposed to accomplish anyway?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I think she thinks she's playing towards the center.
When in fact she's pandering to the other party's extreme.

What I don't get is how she thinks it's going to pay off. It obviously never worked for Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Unfortunately, not all teens are like your son.
I don't have a problem with YOU BUYING IT FOR HIM. My problem is if any age can buy it themselves. REstrict the sales to 18+. If a parent feels there is no problem with their kid playin them, let them buy the games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyForKucinich Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. 18+ will do nothing to stop kids from playing the games.
Most kids have friends who older than them. Heck most kids have siblings who are older than them. Both were the case for me. Thus, things like alcohol, cigarrettes, Adult magazines were accessible to me many years before 18...if I so desired them.

I've killed billions of things in vidoegames. From Ghouls and Ghosts to Koopa Troopas to Police officers to Lions, Tigers and Bears...OH MY!

Violence in videogames has no affect on people who are already good people. If you are a violent person to begin with...some of the things in videogames may alter your mood, like watching a movie gets people hyped on the particular subject or listening to a rap song with a certain mood to it gets the listener to feel that mood...in that sense it videogames can reinforce what you already believe...or if you're playing a game and you find it fun but you don't agree with the real world issues...it's just that...a game.

Videogames are art. And they should not be censored. My favorite videogames is called Xenogears...it almost didn't get released stateside because it's based on the Gnosis mixed with sci-fi elements and God is a weapon and the real god is the Wave Existence. Yes, religious right Christians probably don't want their kids playing this game...however it truly is an amazing story with themes all over the place. This game goes against everything I believe in, in terms of there being a god or not...I'm an agnostic. I still hold my agnostic beliefs but thank the game for its many vibrant characters, it's amazing plot, awesome soundtrack and it's many themes that I and the world can relate to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. The Game Already Has The Equivalent Of An NC17...
rating for movies. If a kid gets hold of it, it's not the publishers fault.

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. more like a rated R.
Plus the content is similar to what's in a rated R movie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. ESRB Rating Of M:
http://www.esrb.org/esrbratings_guide.asp#symbols


<SNIP>

MATURE

Titles rated M (Mature) have content that may be suitable for persons ages 17 and older. Titles in this category may contain intense violence, blood and gore, sexual content, and/or strong language.

</SNIP>

You will probably point to the word "may" as the stickler here, but all the ESRB ratings have this problem. Maybe they should tighten up the ratings a bit. I wouldn't have a problem with that.

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Right, while the NC-17 equivalent for the ESRB would be AO.
Which would be essentially pornography. As far as I've known there's never been a mass market videogame with an AO rating.

I haven't got a problem with the ratings. GTA is the equivalent of an R rated film.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. I Would Think AO Translates To X.
Actually it looks like they could use another category. I bet tons of Japanese game (if released in the US) would get an AO rating. Especially the Hentai <sp?> based ones. I don't quite get that stuff though.

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Yes, NC-17 and X are equivalent.
The MPA got rid of the X rating several years ago and replaced it with "NC-17" to try and remove the stigma attached to the "X" rating. Adults were avoiding "X" rated films simply due to the stigma, and it had in effect become a form of censorship, which was never the intention of the rating system. They've been fiddling around with the system since NC-17 has developed the same stigma since its development.

Japanese pornography games are like pornographic DVDs. They're not subject to the ratings boards since they're not released to the same mass market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. I Think You Actually Have That A Bit Backward.
I don't think that X was ever an actual rating. It was a title that porn producers gave themselves because they could not get their movies rated by the MPAA the NC17 rating was created to bridge the gap between R and the fictitious X. Also adult games are heavily marketed in Japan. Here are a couple of links for you perusal.

http://www.g4tv.com/xplay/features/45356/Cant_Get_a_Girl_Try_a_Dating_Sim.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPAA_film_rating_system

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. I can't say that I want to ban them, but I sure think they should be
regulated as to who can buy them! You buy what you want, but it's wrong for someone 12-18 to be playing Grant Theft Auto for hours every day. They don't all have a mature enough brain to realize you never do that kind of stuff, just to see if you can.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Breaking News: 12 year olds aren't fucking retarded.
Obviously you must think they are stupid. But scientists have learned over the last couple of years that even children can distinguish between fiction and and reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. I didn't say they were stupid, and I didn't say ALL either.
I've seen events happen near where I live, where teens do some very dumb things, and when they get in serious trouble and are asked WHY, their response is always, becaue I just wanted to see what would happen, or because I wanted to see if I could.

Sometimes it's stealing a car, sometimes it's burgulary, or shoplifting.

A friend of mine had a 1970 Barracuda. Not a show car, but fully restored and a nice car. Three kids decided to take it for a joy ride. They were ages 12, 13, & 15. Guess what? They totaled it! Lost control going too fast around a curve. When they were asked WHY, they said, we decided to see if we could! We do really great with the racing games!

I don't mean to insinuate that all teens would do those kind of things, but if only a few do, that's a few too many.

Let the parent make the decision. If they think it's OK for their kid to have the gams, let 'em buy it for them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. What you're getting at is...
children don't understand the difference between fantasy and reality, and if they play violent videogames they'll get a gun and shoot their friend and think they'll come back to life. That's the argument. Same with Harry Potter and witchcraft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. No, you're wrong. I'm positive they know the difference between
fantasy and reality, but they don't have the maturity to decide the "I'm going to try that" idea is just plain stupid! Didn't you ever do anything really dumb when you were young, and now think back and say, Oh Gees, what the hell was I thinking? I have! I was lucky! None of the stupid things I did ever got me or anyone else into real trouble, but some of them sure could have!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. Sorry but the video games made me do it is just a smokescreen
Like no cars were ever stolen and kids never went joyriding before video games? Oh pleeze.

I had a copy of the keys to my mom's car when I was 14...

Maybe it was pong that made me do it... Yeah that's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. I mean it's not like...
you see cars going around curves too fast in movies or anything.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. I made this point in that GTA LBN thread regard the "Hot Coffee" mod
I'd like to make it here:

What we're talking about with the whole "Hot Coffee" thing goes much further than simple content in the game. The mod that enables the scene is a user-created downloadable patch; the content is otherwise locked out during normal play. Further, the mod is much more difficult to apply on the console version than it is on the PC version, and it is the console version that most of the younger set plays. By and large, adults play the PC version more than the console version.

Modding introduces an unpredictable element into the whole concept of gaming: user created content. I mentioned a scenario that could involve the upcoming Elder Scrolls IV- Oblivion game from Bethesda for the PC:

Questing Hero must rescue Damsel in Distress, after which he has sex with her. The modder creating this content writes the plot in such a way that the sex act itself is an integral part of the plot. The damsel's God appears and grants the player some new ability.

Yes, it sounds farfetched, but the beauty of modding is that a scene like that could be written into a user mod and be fairly convincing given the level of realism in current and upcoming games. It is this that the fundy set is really after: stripping the ability of the user to create objectionable content not created by the publisher, possibly by making modding itself as illegal as they can.

Is that a stratch? Perhaps, but at this point, I would put nothing past this bunch. Even the possibility that a user can create something like this is just something they cannot stand to allow.

Don't think they won't try to do something like this. They already want a $90M investigation/study into media and "young minds". Trust me, they would love to add modding to the DMCA as an illegal act if they think they can get away with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. It's like banning etch-a-sketch.
because you're shocked to learn that junior mod it to produce large, albeit squarish, breasts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Exactly.
Although the process is signifigantly more involved, of course. Try making a Half-Life 2 map sometime. Sheesh.

And don't get me started on how hard id's Radiant editor is to use. YUCK!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Oh, I don't know.
You ever seen those expert etch-a-sketch artists? They're quite good and heavily involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. Political Grandstanding
Videogames are not the problem in this world. People who complain about videogames ruining society are the problem.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darwins Finch Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. Pandering
This is such a quick and easy topic for politicos on both side of the aisle to use to bring in the heartland moms and technophobic older folks (not that all older folk are technophobic).

Personally, I think these parents should worry less about their kids unlocking porn in a video game, and worry more about unlocking porn from their dad's sock drawer. Or worse, unlocking the gun cabinet...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kraklen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Well, obviously...
I just can't imagine why they think it's going to work to pander to the other party's extremists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darwins Finch Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Easy
Edited on Thu Jul-14-05 01:46 PM by Darwins Finch
If they appeal to both sides, then EVERYONE will vote for them!

:eyes:

EDIT - Full disclosure here: I write video games as a hobby, so my cynicism should be viewed for what it is - the aberrant thought process of a sadist, deviant, and seducer of the innocent. Please report me to Congress. It's for my own good, really. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. No way, no how! I just finished beating Super Mario Bros. 3 after not
playing it for almost 10 years!

Actually video games have been excellent for my youngest son. He was born with borderline CP and has had small motor problems. When tested the testors couldn't believe how high he scored with hand eye reflex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baclava Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. Forget about having parents do any parenting...
Let's have the Government ban stuff instead....that'll work.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. Speaking for myself
I am perfectly capable of playing any game my daughter gets and seeing if I approve. They're just games. She used to play Doom with me when she was five or six. I think GTO is hilarious, and if people can't figure out that it's just a game, they're idiots. As long as they're advertised appropriately, just like movie previews, I have no problem at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
24. Schumer was all over this last month
He needs to STFU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
30. I do want to ban some games
And that is what I do in my house with my 11 year-old son. In fact, I just came back from the video store where I banned my son from playing some "Let's Beat the Shit out of Somebody or Blow Some Shit Up" game. And I don't even have a tough time with the ratings policy as it is. It's all pretty clear. The government - that is a different issue- keep out of it. Hillary is just getting ready for a run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyForKucinich Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. If Hillary is running on this
She'll be lucky to crack 50 million votes nationwide in the General Election.

I sure the hell won't be voting for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. She isn't running on this, obviously,
but she sure as hell is running for the middle ( and, I think, misreading it). She is my senator, and I'm very disappointed in her of late. That, of course, is all relative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InfoMinister Donating Member (546 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
32. Say Goodbye To The Youth Vote If You Go After Games
The Democrats need to stay out of it. Throughout history we have continuously seen how going after entertainment is a really bad idea. Considering how many young intelligent people are playing videogames as a hobby it seems like a really bad idea to take on that cause. The only thing that needs to happen is that the retailers need to make people show their IDs when they attempt to buy a game with an M rating or above. Then again they don't even do that for R rated movies and some R rated movies have sex scenes that are just as bad or worse than the "Hot Coffee" mod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
35. Isn't this something that parents should be taking care of at a home level
First I have to admit I love video games, I grew up on them and still play them.

My daughter is 18, but when she was younger I did try and guide what she watched and what games she played. I also kept a close eye on the children she played with, and if I though their parents weren't doing their job at home I didn't let her hang out at that kids house. They would come over to our place and I knew what they were watching, listening to and playing.

I didn't need nor want someone to make these choices for my child, that was my job as far as I could tell.

This is just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InfoMinister Donating Member (546 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
45. Videogamers Angry About This
Like I said earlier if Clinton actually follows through with this she's going to have some negative effects on the youth vote. I feel it's the parent's responsibility and not the responsibility of the government to parent our kids. Also, it shows favortism to other markets such as Hollywood movies by only going after videogames. What about R rated movies that anybody can purchase?

Check out some comments on these videogame boards.

http://forums.gamespot.com/gamespot/show_messages.php?board=314159266&topic=22200853&page=0


http://boards.ign.com/Grand_Theft_Auto/b5257/92989256/?13
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
46. Certainly not. And these Senators shouldn't be wasting time on nonsense.
With all that's going on in this administration this is the crap they worry about? It's sickening and they are too busy trying to score political points to realize the sex shit isn't even a part of the real game, it's an add on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC