Roe v Wade - Democratic Underground

mykpart

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-19-05 11:16 PM
Original message

Roe v Wade

If Roe vs Wade were to be overturned, would this then make the "morning after" pill illegal? And IUDs? And invitro fertilization (which involves the destruction of fertilized embryos, and sometimes aborting some of the fetuses because of multiple births)?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Mr_Spock

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-19-05 11:19 PM
Response to Original message

1. I dunno, but I triple dare the Republican morons to push abortion ban

They'll be out of power for 50 years if they do that - bring it on freeptards.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Hippo_Tron

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-19-05 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #1

5. Particularly the morning after pill

Banning abortion is one thing. Trying to ban the morning after pill makes them look ridiculous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

kestrel91316

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-19-05 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #1

6. I don't know about that, BUT ...............

if they follow through with a push to ban contraception they will be out of power for generations. Those that live to tell about it, that is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Mr_Spock

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-19-05 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #6

8. These people know the dangers of what they are doing

I think it's just a threat to distract and cause infighting within our party. They KNOW the Republican party cannot exist without their non-questioning wives in the background. They WILL NOT support an abortion ban (or contraception). They are idiots, but not morons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ScreamingMeemie

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-19-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message

2. I am betting anything that doesn't represent harming a penis will

be affected.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

mykpart

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-19-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #2

3. If that's so, surely there are Republicans who

have conceived by invitro. They won't want to lose that right. Will they?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

MuseRider

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-19-05 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #2

4. Well put

and you are exactly correct.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

renaissanceguy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-19-05 11:38 PM
Response to Original message

7. It means MUCH more than reproductive issues.

RvW is essentially a matter of privacy: Do we want the government making personal decisions for us, or can we look to our own judgment?

You take away RvW, you take away people's personal rights to their own non-traditional families, their sexual practices, their family decisions. The body becomes a puppet of the U.S. government, as controlled by the repugs.

http://www.cafepress.com/liberalissues.21326737

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

mykpart

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-19-05 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #7

10. Well put!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DanCa

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Jul-19-05 11:44 PM
Response to Original message

9. The only place a man has say so is before the act

Than its up to the woman case closed. It takes two to make a baby.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Sat May 04th 2024, 08:59 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.