Roberts was not a thoughtful decision........

springhill

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 01:10 PM
Original message

Roberts was not a thoughtful decision........

He's been waiting in the wings for this appointment since he became a judge just two short years ago. Just as with everything, they know exactly who they want and they leave nothing to chance. Hmmm...he worked on the Gore vs. Bush decision, then in 2003 he was nominated by Bush for a judgeship, and then just two years later he's a Supreme Court Judge nominee. Yep, I'm sure this appointment took a lot of deliberating.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

dogday

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 01:11 PM
Response to Original message

1. this was a thank you payback

to one of the slimy attorneys that made it possible for shrub to become President.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

gman16

(139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message

2. Roberts

was an attempt at a diversion.
They much rather have us debating Roberts than talking about violations of National Security and Treason.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

whistle

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 01:13 PM
Response to Original message

3. Bush and thoughtful decision never go together

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Canuckistanian

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 01:13 PM
Response to Original message

4. So, he was being "groomed" for 5 years

I wonder if they keep a 'stable' of these partisan hacks and keep dangling plum appointments in front of them if they do the right things.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Lecky

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message

5. Bwahaha!

Since when has Bush been thoughtful?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

laureloak

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message

6. It was a quick grab to divert the attention away from

THE BIG LIE that is unfolding.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

springhill

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #6

7. What I was trying to say........

which I guess I didn't to a very good job of doing, was to say that there was no deliberation on who should be the next Supreme Court Justice. They knew who they were going to nominate when they decided two years ago to make him a judge. That is why we also know that he has the same ideology as those currently running our country; which is to say we are in big trouble.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Sat May 04th 2024, 03:35 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.