Plamegate as a RICO violation? Legal minds check in here!

geek tragedy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 01:26 PM
Original message

Plamegate as a RICO violation? Legal minds check in here!

Edited on Wed Jul-20-05 01:28 PM by geek tragedy

I see an enterprise, I see a pattern of racketeering violations involving obstruction of justice and criminal investigations, I see a conspiracy.

Whaddya think? My inner numerologist sees the term "1962(c)" figuring prominently in Rove and Libby's future.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Kagemusha

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message

1. RICO implies an organization that is not the government

What you're looking at is federal felony conspiracy rather than RICO. However, the conspiracy law was not intended to be used where another perfectly good felony would work instead.

A lot depends on who knew what and what their intent was. That needs evidence and testimony and proof.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

geek tragedy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1

2. The government can be an enterprise under the RICO statute.

Edited on Wed Jul-20-05 01:37 PM by geek tragedy

There's extensive case law on bribery, bid-rigging, etc etc. The theory being that Karl Rove, LIbby, etc etc tried to divert some part of the executive branch to use for their own criminal purposes.

Btw, don't forget about the Niger forgeries as being part of a criminal conspiracy!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

marions ghost

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message

3. People keep bringing up RICO...

but I have an impression that RICO isn't really very effective and seldom gets used in prosecutions. Are there any legal heads out there who can corroborate this? Fact is, I have an impression it's just a kind of law that makes people think they are protected against this kind of thing, but in truth, it doesn't work. I'd like for somebody to tell me I'm wrong, as we desperately need such a law that has some teeth in it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

geek tragedy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #3

4. RICO is a devastating tool to use against criminal organizations. Federal

prosecutors LOVE it. The big hook is that co-conspirators are liable for each other's criminal acts, even if they lack specific knowledge of those acts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

marions ghost

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #4

5. so is this being used effectively

in white collar crime cases?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

geek tragedy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #5

6. Oh hell yes. It's used to combat money laundering with great frequency.

Mail and wire fraud, as well as forgery, are all racketeering offenses and predicates under the Act.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

marions ghost

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #6

7. what's the precedent

for the govt being 'an enterprise" under RICO?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

geek tragedy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #7

8. City government, governor's offices, military, etc etc.

Edited on Wed Jul-20-05 02:16 PM by geek tragedy

Bribery is a classic example of a RICO offense in that context-bribing a mayor to divert construction contracts for instance.

The important thing to remember is that RICO is an extremely elastic statute/charge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

marions ghost

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #8

9. OK thanks for the explanation

I wonder if it's ever been used against the Federal Govt then...or would this be something new.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

geek tragedy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #9

11. It's not used against the government--its used against the people

who are corrupting the government. The government itself would be considered a legitimate enterprise.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

marions ghost

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #11

17. oh interesting--

so I see why you are asking the question...has it ever been done before at the federal level do u know?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

geek tragedy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #17

18. If I'm not mistaken, a division of the US army or Navy in Europe

was named by as a legitimate enterprise in a RICO case.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

NewJeffCT

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #5

10. Years back, a local town in CT tried to charge anti-choice types w/ RICO

I don't remember what happened - damn this old age - but, it was West Hartford, CT, a reliably liberal town. The state or town wanted to try to anti-choice types under RICO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

geek tragedy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #10

12. I believe SCOTUS threw out the charges. eom

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

marions ghost

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #10

13. Right I know (vaguely)

that RICO has been mentioned in such cases, but how often has it been used to win? Seems I mostly hear about it's being used as a threat or it's decided that it's not applicable somehow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

geek tragedy

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #13

14. Defendant's will very often plead guilty rather than face a RICO verdict

Very easy to go away for decades.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Patty Diana

(555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #3

16. John Dean has said that Wilson can sue Bush and win___

John Dean knows the law____check Findlaw archives, that's where it was published

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Patty Diana

(555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jul-20-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message

15. At Findlaw John Dean published an article advising Wilson to

sue BushCo privately. I'm sure it's still there somewhere__I haven't got all my bush files on my larger computer yet to search.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Sat May 04th 2024, 02:20 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.