Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Schwarzenegger: Unions are "special interest groups", corporations aren't.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 07:39 AM
Original message
Schwarzenegger: Unions are "special interest groups", corporations aren't.
Edited on Sat Sep-27-03 07:41 AM by Democat
Moyer: You've also said that your opponents are taking special interest money, and you called it tribal money, union money -- but you've taken money from developers, real estate people, high-tech companies in California, not that you would sit down and personally negotiate with them, but they are subject to some state regulation.

Schwarzenegger: I am the only one that has certain guidelines. None of the other candidates have these guidelines. I am the one that says: Here are the different groups I won't take money from -- which is the unions, the Indian gaming.

http://www.nbc4.tv/politics/2515296/detail.html

Any union member who votes for Arnold gets what they deserve if he wins and them screws them over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is he a member of SAG?
Just asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yes he has to be
What an idiot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebel_with_a_cause Donating Member (933 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Arnie and the Chimp et al have inspired some terrific slogans:
"Grow Your Own Dope, Plant A Republickin"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oracle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. Just vote NO on the recall..
Edited on Sat Sep-27-03 12:09 PM by Oracle
so we can put an end to this bullshit Rove via Arnold attempt to take over California!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. this is the key: vote NO on the recall
and this circus will be over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oracle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yes, exactlly, get everyone you know out to vote NO any other idea's...
Edited on Sat Sep-27-03 12:35 PM by Oracle
on getting out the NO vote, will be more than welcome on here on DU.

This in today's SF Chronicle...

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2003/09/27/MN245421.DTL

and

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2003/09/27/MN34095.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. Of course that hypocritical teutonic douchebag is a member
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romberry Donating Member (632 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. Translated into plain language..
..what Ahnuld is saying is that he won't take money from special interest groups that represent working class people and minorities but he will take money from special interest groups that represent big money corporations and investors who often don't have the best interests of working class people and minorities in their business plan. After all, the only thing that matters is profits.

That about cover it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. nicely done, the rupugs dismiss concerns of people for concerns of $
it is such a distorntion of adma smith's ideas in his "The Wealth of Nations" that smith from the grave ought to haunt such distortions.

smith knew right well that wealth producing of companies was a sub-set of scociety in general. he would be shocked to see that people use his ideas to insist that wealth alone was all that these economic entities was about.

the import of government is to do justice for its citizens, this is not met merely by allowing economic entities to creat wealth, yet it is all that free market types think.

i list part of an a essay by william pfatt of the international herald tribune from a few years back for brain food.

"The normal and proper aim of the corporate community is to make money for its managers and for the owners of business all the better if its members also contribute to the general prosperity. However, business acts on the prevailing business philosophy, which claims that corporate self-interest eventually produces the general interest. This comfortable belief rests on misinterpretation of the theory of market rationality proposed by Adam Smith.

"He would have found the market primitivism of the current day unrecognizable. He saw the necessity for public intervention to create or sustain the public interest, and took for granted the existence of a government responsible to the community as a whole, providing the structure within which the economy functions.

"Classical political thought says that the purpose of government is to do justice for its citizens. Part of this obligation is to foster conditions in which wealth is produced. The obligation is not met by substituting the wealth-producer for the government.

"Business looks after the interests of businessmen and corporation stockholders. Stark and selfish self-interest obviously is not what motivates most American businessmen and -women, but it is the doctrine of the contemporary corporation and of the modern American business school."

"It does not automatically serve the general interest, as any 18th century rationalist would acknowledge - or any 21st century realist."

William Pfatt

'bout sums it up don't it?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. Ahnold has the brains...
... of a parsnip.

If the people of California can't figure that out, they're gonna have to live with a vegetable in governor's mansion in Sacramento.

Oh, wait, they've done it before--they elected Reagan, too....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sick of Bullshit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. The problem, though, is that 80% of the voters could vote against Parsnip
Edited on Sat Sep-27-03 11:49 AM by Sick of Bullshit
and he could still get in! That's the damn GOP strategy. That's why they're pushing this damn recall so hard, and why they want all Repubs with a brain to get out of the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pobeka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. I never thought you'd stoop that low
Insulting vegetables like that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Ah, Mr. Scrupulous
"I won't take money from Indian casinos or unions."

Of course, he has a campaign advisor who has some shady connections with Las Vegas casinos, and as a union member himself, well, maybe it's time to find out how well Ah-nuld "acts" while dodging klieg lights that just happen to fall down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NormanConquest Donating Member (346 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. "I hate minorities and the working class"
He's managed to tell the truth about Republican values, at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enraged American Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
9. I respect Schwarzenegger (in a way)
When was the last time you saw a Repig flat-out say that he was against unions and worker's compensation? Because I can't remember. Scwarzenegger doesn't try to BS his way out of questions about the workers; he makes it clear that he's pro-business and capitalist. Bush still goes to speak to unions to kiss their ass with total insincerity.

Schwarzenegger is the type of Republican who would have been not that bad (still a repig) if there weren't 9/11 and the fascist garbage rising. He's not a puppet of the Jews or the Christians; he's pro-business; he doesn't pretend to be for the worker.

The problem is that if he wins he'll be able to manipulate his state's vote in favor of Bush. If it weren't for that I wouldn't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. he's a total hypocrite
since he's a union member himself. fuck this giant chimp...we don't need anymore crazy republican actors in politics. remember what happened with the last one :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. Arnold, you'r a hypocrite. I'll never again watch any of your movies.
Someone should redo "Predator", with a different cast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. Arnie knows where he can go
And he doesn't need to say "I'll be back" before he goes there because the thinking people of this country know better and do not want him back.

Corporations are far more a special interest group because they do not represent the people. Unions do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah
But it's our job to make sure that they know what Arnold's real positions are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-27-03 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. Oddly enough...this was posted in Late
I won't take money from -- which is the unions, the Indian gaming.

But will apparantly take money and support from!!!
Schwarzenegger adviser linked to card clubs, Nevada casinos
Rivals cry foul amid actor's attacks on Indian gaming



"A top political adviser to Arnold Schwarzenegger serves on the board of directors of a company that owns two Nevada casinos and has interests in two Southern California card clubs that compete with casinos run by California Indian tribes."

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/09/27/MN76440.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC